Further characterization of human fetal osteoblastic hFOB 1.19 and hFOB/ERα cells: Bone formation in vivo and karyotype analysis using multicolor fluorescent in situ hybridization

We have previously generated an immortalized human fetal osteoblastic cell line (hFOB) using stably transfected temperature sensitive SV40 T‐antigen (Harris et al. [ 1995a ] J. Bone. Miner. Res. 10:178–1860). To characterize these cells for phenotypic/genotypic attributes desired for a good cell model system, we performed karyotype analysis by multicolor fluorescent in situ hybridization (M‐FISH), their ability to form bone in vivo without developing cell transformation, and finally their ability to form extracellular matrix formation in vitro. The karyotype analysis of hFOB cells revealed structural or numeric anomalies involving 1–2 chromosomes. In contrast, the human osteosarcoma MG63 cells displayed multiple, and often complex, numeric, and structural abnormalities. Subcutaneous injection of hFOB cells in the presence of Matrigel into nude mice resulted in bone formation after 2–3 weeks. Electron microscopic analysis of the extracellular matrix deposited by hFOB cells in culture revealed a parallel array of lightly banded fibrils typical of the fibrillar collagens such as type I and III. These results demonstrate that the hFOB cell line has minimal chromosome abnormalities, exhibit the matrix synthetic properties of differentiated osteoblasts, and are immortalized but non‐transformed cell line. These hFOB cells thus appear to be an excellent model system for the study of osteoblast biology in vitro. J. Cell. Biochem. 87: 9–15, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  P. Hauschka,et al.  Caveolae in Human and Murine Osteoblasts , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[2]  T. Danciu,et al.  Caveolin‐Enriched Membrane Signaling Complexes in Human and Murine Osteoblasts , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[3]  John A. Robinson,et al.  Direct Action of Naturally Occurring Estrogen Metabolites on Human Osteoblastic Cells , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[4]  D. Lacey,et al.  Estrogen stimulates gene expression and protein production of osteoprotegerin in human osteoblastic cells. , 1999, Endocrinology.

[5]  M. Law,et al.  Utility of multicolor fluorescent in situ hybridization in clinical cytogenetics , 1999, Genetics in Medicine.

[6]  B. Riggs,et al.  Bone morphogenetic protein-6 production in human osteoblastic cell lines. Selective regulation by estrogen. , 1998, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[7]  J. A. Robinson,et al.  Estrogen Regulation of Human Osteoblastic Cell Proliferation and Differentiation* , 2022 .

[8]  D. Ward,et al.  Karyotyping human chromosomes by combinatorial multi-fluor FISH , 1996, Nature Genetics.

[9]  B. Riggs,et al.  Estrogen inhibits interleukin‐6 production and gene expression in a human osteoblastic cell line with high levels of estrogen receptors , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[10]  B. Riggs,et al.  Estrogen response in the hFOB 1.19 human fetal osteoblastic cell line stably transfected with the human estrogen receptor gene , 1995, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[11]  T. Spelsberg,et al.  Development and characterization of a conditionally immortalized human fetal osteoblastic cell line , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[12]  M. Gowen,et al.  Are MG-63 and HOS TE85 human osteosarcoma cell lines representative models of the osteoblastic phenotype? , 1994, Bone.

[13]  G S Stein,et al.  Molecular mechanisms mediating proliferation/differentiation interrelationships during progressive development of the osteoblast phenotype. , 1993, Endocrine reviews.

[14]  G. Stein,et al.  Progressive changes in the protein composition of the nuclear matrix during rat osteoblast differentiation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  G. Stein,et al.  Factors that promote progressive development of the osteoblast phenotype in cultured fetal rat calvaria cells , 1990, Journal of cellular physiology.

[16]  G. Rodan,et al.  Tissue specificity and developmental expression of rat osteopontin. , 1987, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[17]  J B Lian,et al.  Expression of differentiated function by mineralizing cultures of chicken osteoblasts. , 1987, Developmental biology.

[18]  T. Orfeo,et al.  One hundred and twenty-seven cultured human tumor cell lines producing tumors in nude mice. , 1977, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  C. Bradt,et al.  Cultivation in vitro of cells derived from a human osteosarcoma , 1971, Cancer.

[20]  J. Pontén,et al.  Two established in vitro cell lines from human mesenchymal tumours , 1967, International journal of cancer.

[21]  P. Robey,et al.  Human bone cells in vitro. , 1985, Calcified tissue international.

[22]  A. Billiau,et al.  In vitro cultivation of human tumor tissues. II. Morphological and virological characterization of three cell lines. , 1978, Oncology.

[23]  A. Billiau,et al.  In vitro cultivation of human tumor tissues. , 1975, Oncology.

[24]  MARTIN C. Raff Nude mice , 1974, Nature.