Computation and Evaluation of Medial Surfaces for Shape Representation of Abdominal Organs

Medial representations are powerful tools for describing and parameterizing the volumetric shape of anatomical structures. Existing methods show excellent results when applied to 2D objects, but their quality drops across dimensions. This paper contributes to the computation of medial manifolds in two aspects. First, we provide a standard scheme for the computation of medial manifolds that avoid degenerated medial axis segments; second, we introduce an energy based method which performs independently of the dimension. We evaluate quantitatively the performance of our method with respect to existing approaches, by applying them to synthetic shapes of known medial geometry. Finally, we show results on shape representation of multiple abdominal organs, exploring the use of medial manifolds for the representation of multi-organ relations.

[1]  Martin Styner,et al.  Comparison and Evaluation of Methods for Liver Segmentation From CT Datasets , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Christopher J. Taylor,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2009 , 2009, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[3]  Sunghee Choi,et al.  The power crust, unions of balls, and the medial axis transform , 2001, Comput. Geom..

[4]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Multi-organ Segmentation from Multi-phase Abdominal CT via 4D Graphs Using Enhancement, Shape and Location Optimization , 2010, MICCAI.

[6]  Kaleem Siddiqi,et al.  Divergence-Based Medial Surfaces , 2000, ECCV.

[7]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Non-linear Bayesian Image Modelling , 2000, ECCV.

[8]  Sukmoon Chang.  Extracting Skeletons from Distance Maps , 2007 .

[9]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2010, 13th International Conference, Beijing, China, September 20-24, 2010, Proceedings, Part III , 2010, MICCAI.

[10]  Hongen Liao,et al.  Medical Imaging and Augmented Reality , 2004 .

[11]  Rangasami L. Kashyap,et al.  Building Skeleton Models via 3-D Medial Surface/Axis Thinning Algorithms , 1994, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[12]  J. Bigun,et al.  Optimal Orientation Detection of Linear Symmetry , 1987, ICCV 1987.

[13]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Anatomical variability of organs via principal factor analysis from the construction of an abdominal probabilistic atlas , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[14]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Ridges and valleys on digital images , 1983, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[15]  Chris Pudney,et al.  Distance-Ordered Homotopic Thinning: A Skeletonization Algorithm for 3D Digital Images , 1998, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[16]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Organ Pose Distribution Model and an MAP Framework for Automated Abdominal Multi-organ Localization , 2010, MIAR.

[17]  Aly A. Farag,et al.  Robust skeletonization using the fast marching method , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2005.

[18]  Kaleem Siddiqi,et al.  Flux driven automatic centerline extraction , 2005, Medical Image Anal..

[19]  Kaleem Siddiqi,et al.  Hamilton-Jacobi Skeletons , 2002, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[20]  Alexandru Telea,et al.  An Augmented Fast Marching Method for Computing Skeletons and Centerlines , 2002, VisSym.

[21]  Ronald M. Summers,et al.  Statistical Location Model for Abdominal Organ Localization , 2009, MICCAI.

[22]  Paul A. Yushkevich,et al.  Continuous Medial Representation for Anatomical Structures , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  Joan Serrat,et al.  Evaluation of Methods for Ridge and Valley Detection , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..