Distribution of SARS-CoV-2 PCR Cycle Threshold Values Provide Practical Insight Into Overall and Target-Specific Sensitivity Among Symptomatic Patients

Abstract Objectives We examined the distribution of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) cycle threshold (CT) values obtained from symptomatic patients being evaluated for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to determine the proportion of specimens containing a viral load near the assay limit of detection (LoD) to gain practical insight to the risk of false-negative results. We also examined the relationship between CT value and patient age to determine any age-dependent difference in viral load or test sensitivity. Methods We collected CT values obtained from the cobas severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) assay corresponding to 1,213 combined nasopharyngeal-oropharyngeal specimens obtained from symptomatic individuals that were reported as positive or presumptive positive for SARS-CoV-2. CT values were stratified by SARS-CoV target and patient age group. Results In total, 93.3% to 98.4% of specimens demonstrated CT values greater than 3× the assay LoD, at which point false-negative results would not be expected. The mean of CT values between age groups was statistically equivalent with the exception of patients in age group 80 to 89 years, which demonstrated slightly lower CTs. Conclusions Based on the distribution of observed CT values, including the small proportion of specimens with values near the assay LoD, there is a low risk of false-negative RT-PCR results in combined nasopharyngeal-oropharyngeal specimens obtained from symptomatic individuals.

[1]  P. Vollmar,et al.  Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019 , 2020, Nature.

[2]  A. Harrington,et al.  Comparison of Abbott ID Now and Abbott m2000 Methods for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from Nasopharyngeal and Nasal Swabs from Symptomatic Patients , 2020, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[3]  Lowell Ling,et al.  Viral dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 across a spectrum of disease severity in COVID-19 , 2020, Journal of Infection.

[4]  Bingliang Zeng,et al.  Diagnosis of the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): rRT-PCR or CT? , 2020, European Journal of Radiology.

[5]  Comparison of Commercially Available and Laboratory-Developed Assays for In Vitro Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Laboratories , 2020, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[6]  Deborah Schron,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of Three Sample-to-Answer Platforms for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[7]  Eileen M. Burd,et al.  Validation of Laboratory-Developed Molecular Assays for Infectious Diseases , 2010, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[8]  M. Loda,et al.  Comparison of Two High-Throughput Reverse Transcription-PCR Systems for the Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 , 2020, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[9]  Comparison of Four Molecular In Vitro Diagnostic Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Nasopharyngeal Specimens , 2020, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[10]  R. Lu,et al.  Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens. , 2020, JAMA.

[11]  A. Kamimoto,et al.  Saliva-based PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 detection. , 2020, Journal of oral science.

[12]  A M Caliendo,et al.  Interlaboratory Comparison of Cytomegalovirus Viral Load Assays , 2009, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[13]  J. A. Mays,et al.  Detection of SARS-CoV-2 by bronchoscopy after negative nasopharyngeal testing: Stay vigilant for COVID-19 , 2020, Respiratory Medicine Case Reports.

[14]  D. Vojta,et al.  Patient-collected tongue, nasal, and mid-turbinate swabs compared to health care worker-collected nasopharyngeal swabs for COVID-19 testing , 2020, The New England Journal of Medicine.

[15]  B. Pritt,et al.  Precision across the Analytical Measuring Range of a Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assay for Cytomegalovirus Detection among Three Clinical Laboratories , 2011, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[16]  L. Kucirka,et al.  Variation in False-Negative Rate of Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction–Based SARS-CoV-2 Tests by Time Since Exposure , 2020, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[17]  Q. Tao,et al.  Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases , 2020, Radiology.

[18]  C. Schmotzer,et al.  Comparison of Abbott ID Now, DiaSorin Simplexa, and CDC FDA Emergency Use Authorization Methods for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from Nasopharyngeal and Nasal Swabs from Individuals Diagnosed with COVID-19 , 2020, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.