Connectivity and Performance of Science-based Firms

This paper addresses whether or not there is a relationship between a young science-based firm’s patterns of connections and the associated resource flows, and its performance. Hypotheses derived from the literature are tested in relation to three performance indicators: inventiveness, innovativeness and employment. Analyzing a set of firms in Sweden, Ohio and Massachusetts, working with biocompatible materials and related products, the results indicate that firm performance is significantly influenced by the firms’ pattern of connectivity. In particular, technology-related connections proved important, where a high diversity in types of sources for technological input, a large number of technological relations and a high amount of technology transfer from the parent organization were related to better performance for this specific group of firms.

[1]  Knut Senneseth,et al.  A Panel Study of Firm Growth among SMEs in Networks , 2001 .

[2]  Luigi Orsenigo,et al.  The emergence of biotechnology , 1989 .

[3]  Erik Stam,et al.  The Evolution and Nature of Young Firm Networks: a longitudinal Perspective , 2003 .

[4]  R. Watson,et al.  Firm Growth and Supply Chain Partnerships: An Empirical Analysis of U.K. SME Subcontractors , 2005 .

[5]  L. D. Propris.  Innovation And Inter-Firm Co-Operation: The Case Of The West Midlands , 2000 .

[6]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[7]  Sergio Bruno,et al.  The behaviour of the innovative firm: Relations to the environment , 1990 .

[8]  W. Hulsink,et al.  Networks in Entrepreneurship: The Case of High-technology Firms , 2001 .

[9]  Keith Dickson,et al.  "There are two sides to every story": Innovation and collaboration within networks of large and small firms , 1991 .

[10]  Maureen McKelvey.  Coevolution in Commercial Genetic Engineering , 1997 .

[11]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[12]  Rik Donckels,et al.  Networks and small business growth: An explanatory model , 1995 .

[13]  A. Saxenian.  The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley , 1991 .

[14]  W. Mitchell,et al.  SURVIVAL OF BUSINESSES USING COLLABORATIVE RELATIONSHIPS TO COMMERCIALIZE COMPLEX GOODS , 1996 .

[15]  Maureen McKelvey,et al.  The economic dynamics of modern biotechnology , 2004 .

[16]  C. Debresson,et al.  Networks of innovators:A review and introduction to the issue , 1991 .

[17]  B. Kogut,et al.  Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry , 1994 .

[18]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Organizational Growth: Linking Founding Team, Strategy, Environment, and Growth among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures, 1978-1988. , 1990 .

[19]  Åsa Lindholm,et al.  The Economics of Technology-Related Ownership Changes : A Study of Innovativeness and Growth through Acquisitions and Spin-offs , 1994 .

[20]  A. Markusen.  Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of Industrial Districts* , 1996 .

[21]  W. Powell,et al.  Networks and Economic life , 2003 .

[22]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Entrepreneurs in high technology : lessons from MIT and beyond , 1991 .

[23]  Gunnar Eliasson,et al.  The Nature and Importance of Economic Competence , 1994 .

[24]  Matthias Almus,et al.  Growth of New Technology-Based Firms: Which Factors Matter? , 1999 .

[25]  Robert J. Bennett,et al.  SME Growth: The Relationship with Business Advice and External Collaboration , 2000 .

[26]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance. , 1994 .

[27]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[28]  B. Carlsson,et al.  On the nature, function and composition of technological systems , 1991 .

[29]  Michael J. Enright,et al.  Regional clusters and firm strategy , 1999 .

[30]  Strategy and Performance Factors Behind Rapid Growth in Canadian Biotechnology Firms , 2000 .

[31]  Roy Rothwell,et al.  External networking and innovation in small and medium-sized manufacturing firms in Europe , 1991 .

[32]  Philip Cooke,et al.  The new wave of regional innovation networks: Analysis, characteristics and strategy , 1996 .

[33]  Rosa Grimaldi,et al.  Exploring the Networking Characteristics of New Venture Founding Teams: A Stdy of Italian Academic Spin-off , 2003 .

[34]  Bo Carlsson,et al.  Technological systems and economic performance : the case of factory automation , 1995 .

[35]  B. Kogut,et al.  Localization of Knowledge and the Mobility of Engineers in Regional Networks , 1999 .

[36]  Massimo Riccaboni,et al.  Technological Regimes and the Growth of Networks: An Empirical Analysis , 2001 .

[37]  G. Willard,et al.  Incubators and performance: A comparison of high- and low-growth high-tech firms , 1989 .

[38]  J. Segers.  Strategic partnering between new technology based firms and large established firms in the biotechnology and micro-electronics industries in Belgium , 1993 .

[39]  E. Autio,et al.  The Network Embeddedness of New, Technology-Based Firms: Developing A Systemic Evolution Model , 1998 .

[40]  E. Autio,et al.  Knowledge relatedness and post-spin-off growth , 2004 .

[41]  Amy K. Glasmeier,et al.  Technological discontinuities and flexible production networks: The case of Switzerland and the world watch industry * , 1991 .

[42]  J. Florin.  Is venture capital worth it? Effects on firm performance and founder returns , 2005 .

[43]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[44]  G. Pisano.  The governance of innovation: Vertical integration and collaborative arrangements in the biotechnology industry☆ , 1991 .

[45]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups , 2004 .

[46]  Gerald E. Lowther.  There are two sides to every story , 1993 .

[47]  B. Tether.  Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis , 2002 .

[48]  J. Brüderl,et al.  Network Support and the Success of Newly Founded Business , 1998 .

[49]  Toby E. Stuart.  Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates i , 2000 .

[50]  Massimo Riccaboni,et al.  Technological change and network dynamics: Lessons from the pharmaceutical industry , 2001 .

[51]  Amalya L. Oliver,et al.  Social Networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms , 1994 .

[52]  Jérôme Doutriaux,et al.  Emerging high-tech firms: How durable are their comparative start-up advantages?☆ , 1992 .

[53]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  Technology and industrial innovation in Sweden: A study of technology-based firms formed between 1965 and 1980 , 1993 .

[54]  M. Rogers.  Networks, Firm Size and Innovation , 2004 .