A Terrain‐Based Site‐Conditions Map of California with Implications for the Contiguous United States

Abstract We present an approach based on geomorphometry to predict material properties and characterize site conditions using the V S 30 parameter (time‐averaged shear‐wave velocity to a depth of 30 m). Our framework consists of an automated terrain classification scheme based on taxonomic criteria (slope gradient, local convexity, and surface texture) that systematically identifies 16 terrain types from 1‐km spatial resolution (30 arcsec) Shuttle Radar Topography Mission digital elevation models (SRTMDEMs). Using 853 V S 30 values from California, we apply a simulation‐based statistical method to determine the mean V S 30 for each terrain type in California. We then compare the V S 30 values with models based on individual proxies, such as mapped surface geology and topographic slope, and show that our systematic terrain‐based approach consistently performs better than semiempirical estimates based on individual proxies. To further evaluate our model, we apply our California‐based estimates to terrains of the contiguous United States. Comparisons of our estimates with 325 V S 30 measurements outside of California, as well as estimates based on the topographic slope model, indicate our method to be statistically robust and more accurate. Our approach thus provides an objective and robust method for extending estimates of V S 30 for regions where in situ measurements are sparse or not readily available.

[1]  C. Wills.  Differences in Shear-Wave Velocity due to Measurement Methods: A Cautionary Note , 1998 .

[2]  D. Bindi,et al.  The 6 April 2009 Mw 6.3 L'Aquila (Central Italy) Earthquake: Strong-motion Observations , 2009 .

[3]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Hill shading and the reflectance map , 1981, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[4]  Charles S. Mueller,et al.  Documentation for initial seismic hazard maps for Haiti , 2010 .

[5]  Holger Gärtner,et al.  Principles of semantic modeling of landform structures , 2001 .

[6]  J. Phillips.  The perfect landscape , 2007, Landscape Evolution.

[7]  Masashi Matsuoka,et al.  Regression analysis of Vs30 using topographic attributes from a 50-m DEM , 2010 .

[8]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Should average shear-wave velocity in the top 30 m of soil be used to describe seismic amplification? , 2010 .

[9]  W. B. Joyner,et al.  Equations for Estimating Horizontal Response Spectra and Peak Acceleration from Western North American Earthquakes: A Summary of Recent Work , 1997 .

[10]  Roger D. Borcherdt,et al.  Estimates of Site-Dependent Response Spectra for Design (Methodology and Justification) , 1994 .

[11]  Margaret Hellweg,et al.  Directional topographic site response at Tarzana observed in aftershocks of the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake: Implications for mainshock motions , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[12]  T. Hengl,et al.  Chapter 1 Geomorphometry: A Brief Guide , 2009 .

[13]  I. Evans,et al.  Elementary forms for land surface segmentation: The theoretical basis of terrain analysis and geomorphological mapping , 2008 .

[14]  Robert W. Graves,et al.  The SCEC Southern California Reference Three-Dimensional Seismic Velocity Model Version 2 , 2000 .

[15]  Takahiko Furuya,et al.  Landform analysis of slope movements using DEM in Higashikubiki area, Japan , 2001 .

[16]  R. Borcherdt.  Effects of local geology on ground motion near San Francisco Bay , 1970 .

[17]  Edward H. Field,et al.  A Modified Ground-Motion Attenuation Relationship for Southern California that Accounts for Detailed Site Classification and a Basin-Depth Effect , 2000 .

[18]  William A. Bryant,et al.  A Site-Conditions Map for California Based on Geology and Shear-Wave Velocity , 2000 .

[19]  C. Cramer,et al.  Seismic ground-motion hazard mapping incorporating site effects for Los Angeles, Orange, and Ventura counties, California: A geographical information system application , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[20]  Susan E. Hough,et al.  Site Characterization Using Integrated Imaging Analysis Methods on Satellite Data of the Islamabad, Pakistan, Region , 2008 .

[21]  H. Bolton Seed,et al.  Site-dependent spectra for earthquake-resistant design , 1976, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[22]  David M. Boore,et al.  DETERMINING SUBSURFACE SHEAR-WAVE VELOCITIES: A REVIEW , 2006 .

[23]  P. Maechling,et al.  Strong shaking in Los Angeles expected from southern San Andreas earthquake , 2006 .

[24]  Steven M. Day,et al.  Control of strong motion by the upper 30 meters , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[25]  M. A. Oliver,et al.  Semi‐variograms for modelling the spatial pattern of landform and soil properties , 1986 .

[26]  Keiiti Aki,et al.  Local Site Effects on Strong Ground Motion , 1988 .

[27]  Preliminary results for a semi-automated quantification of site effects using geomorphometry and ASTER satellite data for Mozambique, Pakistan and Turkey , 2008 .

[28]  Greg Hancock,et al.  Spatial organization of soil depths using a landform evolution model , 2003 .

[29]  David A. Seal,et al.  The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission , 2007 .

[30]  J. Harden.  Soil development on stable landforms and implications for landscape studies , 1990 .

[31]  Anderson,et al.  Development of mountainous topography in the Basin Ranges, USA , 1999 .

[32]  W. B. Joyner,et al.  The effect of Quaternary alluvium on strong ground motion in the Coyote Lake, California, earthquake of 1979 , 1981 .

[33]  Francisco J. Sánchez-Sesma,et al.  Diffraction of elastic SH waves by wedges , 1985 .

[34]  D. Boore,et al.  CAN SITE RESPONSE BE PREDICTED? , 2004 .

[35]  P. J. Clark,et al.  Distance to Nearest Neighbor as a Measure of Spatial Relationships in Populations , 1954 .

[36]  Glenn J. Rix,et al.  Ground Motion Amplification of Soils in the Upper Mississippi Embayment , 2005 .

[37]  Fumio Yamazaki,et al.  Relationship between geomorphological land classification and site amplification ratio based on JMA strong motion records , 1999 .

[38]  D. Komatitsch,et al.  Effects of Realistic Surface Topography on Seismic Ground Motion in the Yangminshan Region of Taiwan Based Upon the Spectral-Element Method and LiDAR DTM , 2009 .

[39]  W. Graf.  Geomorphic Systems of North America , 1988 .

[40]  Raymond B. Seed,et al.  New Site Coefficients and Site Classification System Used in Recent Building Seismic Code Provisions , 2000 .

[41]  Mario Ordaz,et al.  On the origin of long coda observed in the lake-bed strong-motion records of Mexico City , 1993, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[42]  Nick Gregor,et al.  NGA Project Strong-Motion Database , 2008 .

[43]  National Site Classification Map for Australia , 2005 .

[44]  D. Wald,et al.  Review Article Topographic Slope as a Proxy for Seismic Site Conditions and Amplification , 2007 .

[45]  John R. Jensen,et al.  Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective , 1986 .

[46]  Steven E. Franklin,et al.  Geomorphometric processing of digital elevation models , 1987 .

[47]  W. B. Joyner,et al.  ESTIMATION OF RESPONSE SPECTRA AND PEAK ACCELERATIONS FROM WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN EARTHQUAKES: AN INTERIM REPORT PART 2 , 1993 .

[48]  T. Holzer,et al.  Shear-Wave Velocity of Surficial Geologic Sediments in Northern California: Statistical Distributions and Depth Dependence , 2005 .

[49]  E. Hammond,et al.  ANALYSIS OF PROPERTIES IN LAND FORM GEOGRAPHY: AN APPLICATION TO BROAD-SCALE LAND FORM MAPPING , 1964 .

[50]  C. Wills,et al.  Developing a map of geologically defined site-condition categories for California , 2006 .

[51]  Roger D. Borcherdt,et al.  On the characteristics of local geology and their influence on ground motions generated by the Loma Prieta earthquake in the San Francisco Bay region, California , 1992 .

[52]  R. J. Pike,et al.  Automated classifications of topography from DEMs by an unsupervised nested-means algorithm and a three-part geometric signature , 2007 .

[53]  E. Hammond,et al.  Small-Scale Continental Landform Maps , 1954 .

[54]  R. D. Borcherdt,et al.  Sediment-induced amplification and the collapse of the Nimitz Freeway , 1990, Nature.

[55]  Paul M. Davis,et al.  Localized Amplification of Seismic Waves and Correlation with Damae due to the Northridge Earthquake: Evidence for Focusing in Santa Monica , 1996 .

[56]  E. Kausel,et al.  Effects of Local Soil Conditions on the Topographic Aggravation of Seismic Motion: Parametric Investigation and Recorded Field Evidence from the 1999 Athens Earthquake , 2005 .

[57]  Luca Malagnini,et al.  Characteristics of the strong ground motions from the 6 April 2009 L’Aquila earthquake, Italy , 2010 .

[58]  David Carver,et al.  Nonlinear and Linear Site Response and Basin Effects in Seattle for the M 6.8 Nisqually, Washington, Earthquake , 2002 .

[59]  Morton W. Scripter.  NESTED-MEANS MAP CLASSES FOR STATISTICAL MAPS , 1970 .

[60]  L. Baise,et al.  A geostatistical approach to mapping site response spectral amplifications , 2010 .

[61]  Scott D. Elrick,et al.  Predictions of shear-wave velocities in southern California using surface geology , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[62]  Walter J. Silva,et al.  Shear-Wave Velocity Characteristics of Geologic Units in California , 1998 .

[63]  Susan E. Hough,et al.  Localized damage caused by topographic amplification during the 2010 M 7.0 Haiti earthquake , 2010 .

[64]  T. Fumal,et al.  Correlations between seismic wave velocities and physical properties of near-surface geologic materials in the southern San Francisco Bay region, California , 1978 .

[65]  Mark A. Fonstad,et al.  Preface: Complexity (and simplicity) in landscapes , 2007 .

[66]  Robb E.S. Moss,et al.  Quantifying Measurement Uncertainty of Thirty-Meter Shear-Wave Velocity , 2008 .