Safe fall: Humanoid robot fall direction change through intelligent stepping and inertia shaping

Although fall is a rare event in the life of a humanoid robot, we must be prepared for it because its consequences are serious. In this paper we present a fall strategy which rapidly modifies the robot's fall direction in order to avoid hitting a person or an object in the vicinity. Our approach is based on the key observation that during “toppling” the rotational motion of a robot necessarily occurs at the leading edge or the leading corner of its support base polygon. To modify the fall direction the robot needs to change the position and orientation of this edge or corner vis-a-vis the prohibited direction. We achieve it through intelligent stepping as soon as a fall is detected. We compute the optimal stepping location which results in the safest fall. Additional improvement to the fall controller is achieved through inertia shaping techniques aimed at controlling the centroidal inertia of the robot. We demonstrate our results through the simulation of an Asimo-like humanoid robot. To our knowledge, this is the first implementation of a controller that attempts to change the fall direction of a humanoid robot.

[1]  Pierre-Brice Wieber On the stability of walking systems , 2002 .

[2]  Olivier Michel,et al.  Cyberbotics Ltd. Webots™: Professional Mobile Robot Simulation , 2004, ArXiv.

[3]  Shuuji Kajita,et al.  Falling motion control of a humanoid robot trained by virtual supplementary tests , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[4]  Olivier Michel,et al.  Cyberbotics Ltd. Webots™: Professional Mobile Robot Simulation , 2004 .

[5]  Sergey V. Drakunov,et al.  Capture Point: A Step toward Humanoid Push Recovery , 2006, 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[6]  Sung-Hee Lee,et al.  Reaction Mass Pendulum (RMP): An explicit model for centroidal angular momentum of humanoid robots , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Kazuhito Yokoi,et al.  UKEMI: falling motion control to minimize damage to biped humanoid robot , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[8]  Shuuji Kajita,et al.  Towards an Optimal Falling Motion for a Humanoid Robot , 2006, 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[9]  Peter I. Corke,et al.  Nonlinear control of the Reaction Wheel Pendulum , 2001, Autom..

[10]  Yasuo Kuniyoshi,et al.  Real-time selection and generation of fall damage reduction actions for humanoid robots , 2008, Humanoids 2008 - 8th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[11]  Kazuhito Yokoi,et al.  The first human-size humanoid that can fall over safely and stand-up again , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[12]  Shuuji Kajita,et al.  Safe knee landing of a human-size humanoid robot while falling forward , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[13]  Yasuo Kuniyoshi,et al.  Falling motion control for humanoid robots while walking , 2007, 2007 7th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[14]  M. Spong,et al.  Nonlinear Control of the Inertia Wheel Pendulum , 1999 .

[15]  Shuuji Kajita,et al.  An optimal planning of falling motions of a humanoid robot , 2007, 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[16]  S. Robinovitch,et al.  Wrist impact velocities are smaller in forward falls than backward falls from standing. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation , 1994 .

[18]  David E. Orin,et al.  Efficient Dynamic Computer Simulation of Robotic Mechanisms , 1982 .