Comparison of Taiwan Science Students' Outcomes With Inquiry-Group Versus Traditional Instruction

The authors examined the comparative efficiency of inquiry-group instruction and traditional teaching methods on junior high school students' achievement and attitudes toward earth science in Taiwan. A nonequivalent control group quasi-experimental design involving 16 intact classes was used. Treatment group students (n = 319) received an inquiry-group instruction; control group students (n = 293) received a traditional approach. Data collection instruments included the Earth Science Achievement Test and the Attitudes Toward Earth Science Inventory (S. L. Mao & C. Y. Chang, 1997). A multivariate analysis of covariance suggested that (a) students in the experimental group had significantly higher achievement scores than did students in the control group and that (b) there were statistically significant differences in favor of the inquiry-group instruction on student attitudes toward the subject matter.

[1]  H. Seymour Fowler,et al.  Effects of traditional and discovery instructional approaches on learning outcomes for learners of different intellectual development: A study of chemistry students in Zambia , 1987 .

[2]  Leopold E. Klopfer,et al.  The role of inquiry in science education: Analysis and recommendations , 1981 .

[3]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning on students' achievement in science class , 1982 .

[4]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Cooperative Learning in Middle and Secondary Schools. , 1996 .

[5]  Susan R. Seymour,et al.  Operative Computer Learning with Cooperative Task and Reward Structures , 1994 .

[6]  William C. Kyle,et al.  An Implementation Study: An Analysis of Elementary Students' and Teachers' Attitudes toward Science in Process-Approach vs. Traditional Science Classes. , 1988 .

[7]  E. T. Henkel,et al.  Undergraduate physics instruction and critical thinking ability. The effects of instruction in physics upon the critical thinking ability of undergraduate students , 1967 .

[8]  M. Oliver.  The Efficiency of Three Methods of Teaching High School Biology , 1965 .

[9]  Ömer Geban,et al.  The Effect of the Inquiry Teaching Method on Biochemistry and Science Process Skill Achievements. , 1994 .

[10]  D. Campbell,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH , 2012 .

[11]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[12]  James R. Okey,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effects of various science teaching strategies on achievement , 1983 .

[13]  Peter Akinsola Okebukola,et al.  Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic science laboratory interaction patterns - effects on students' achievement and acquisition of practical skills , 1984 .

[14]  Victor J. Mayer,et al.  Using the earth system for integrating the science curriculum , 1995 .

[15]  J. Renner,et al.  A study of the inquiry-discovery method of laboratory instruction , 1970 .

[16]  Roger T. Johnson,et al.  The relationship between cooperation and inquiry in science classrooms , 1976 .

[17]  What Makes for a Good Beginning? Improvising in an Elementary Mathematics Teacher Inquiry Group. , 1997 .

[18]  William C. Orr.  Retention as a Variable in Comparing Programmed and Conventional Instructional Methods , 1968 .

[19]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[20]  John E. Penick,et al.  The influence of classroom climate on science process and content achievement of community college students , 1983 .

[21]  Reuven Lazarowitz,et al.  Learning science in a cooperative setting: Academic achievement and affective outcomes , 1994 .

[22]  Daniel P. Shepardson,et al.  A Comparison of Concrete and Formal Science Instruction upon Science Achievement and Reasoning Ability of Sixth Grade Students. , 1987 .

[23]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  The effect of levels of cooperation within physical science laboratory groups on physical science achievement , 1994 .

[24]  Eugene L. Chiappetta,et al.  The effects of a problem solving strategy on the achievement of earth science students , 1981 .

[25]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  The effect of early teaching and training experience on physics achievement, attitude toward science and science teaching, and process skill proficiency , 1977 .

[26]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[27]  Chun-Yen Chang,et al.  The use of a problem-solving-based instructional model in initiating change in students' achievement and alternative frameworks , 1999 .

[28]  William C. Kyle,et al.  The effects of new science curricula on student performance , 1983 .

[29]  Donald A. Hall,et al.  A comparison of a biological sciences curriculum study (BSCS) laboratory and a traditional laboratory on student achievement at two private liberal arts colleges , 1990 .

[30]  Ron Good,et al.  Effects of cooperative grouping on stoichiometric problem solving in high school chemistry , 1990 .

[31]  Jacqueline K. Peck,et al.  So much success… from a first-grade database project! , 1997 .

[32]  B. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1966 .

[33]  Lawrence W. Sherman,et al.  A comparative study of cooperative and competitive achievement in two secondary biology classrooms: The group investigation model versus an individually competitive goal structure , 1989 .

[34]  Ömer Geban,et al.  Effects of Computer Simulations and Problem-Solving Approaches on High School Students , 1992 .

[35]  Ömer Geban,et al.  Effect of instruction supplied with the investigative‐oriented laboratory approach on achievement in a science course , 1996 .

[36]  Paul J. Germann,et al.  Directed‐inquiry approach to learning science process skills: treatment effects and aptitude‐treatment interactions , 1989 .