Gathering and Applying Guidelines for Mobile Robot Design for Urban Search and Rescue Application

Robotics technology can assist Urban Search and Rescue (USAR) by allowing to explore environments inaccessible or unsafe for a human team [1]. This creates the need to develop a better understanding of the USAR procedures and specific requirements in order to guide the design of the robotics technology which will be accepted by USAR professionals. The current paper explores the specific requirements for the assistive technology, and extracts design guidelines for development of the robotic technology to be used during USAR operations. Design guidelines are derived from both literature review and from a qualitative study performed with Vancouver Heavy Urban Search and Rescue Task Force (HUSAR), focusing on usage scenarios and specific requirements for communication, control and user experience. The study revealed that the most crucial factors for the design of the robot are speed, robustness, reliability, weight, affordability, and adaptability to different environments and tasks, as well as ability to provide a two-way audio/video communication. For the interface, the most important characteristics are its learnability, immersiveness, and ability to afford a high sense of spatial presence. We further discuss how the above requirements were implemented though a case-study of the development of the “TeleSpider” (a hexapod tele-operated walking robot), and assess its effectiveness during the field testing at the Vancouver HUSAR warehouse. Failing to meet a number of the discussed requirements will likely result in the technology to be rejected by the USAR team, and never being used during actual deployments as has happened with a number of existing technologies.

[1]  Ronald L. Boring,et al.  "I call shotgun!": an evaluation of mixed-initiative control for novice users of a search and rescue robot , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37583).

[2]  E. Brener,et al.  Crystallization stability during capillary shaping: II. Capillary stability for arbitrary small perturbations , 1980 .

[3]  George Pallis,et al.  Factors that affect rescue time in urban search and rescue (USAR) operations , 2014, Natural Hazards.

[4]  Robert Bogue,et al.  Industrial Robot : An International Journal Search and rescue and disaster relief robots : has their time finally come ? , 2016 .

[5]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Moonlight in Miami: a field study of human-robot interaction in the context of an urban search and rescue disaster response training exercise , 2004 .

[6]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Human-robot interactions during the robot-assisted urban search and rescue response at the World Trade Center , 2003, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[7]  John Anderson,et al.  Agent-Based Support for Balancing teleoperation and Autonomy in Urban Search and Rescue , 2006, Int. J. Robotics Autom..

[8]  Ronald S. Fearing,et al.  RoACH: An autonomous 2.4g crawling hexapod robot , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[9]  Pedro U. Lima,et al.  Search and Rescue Robots: The Civil Protection Teams of the Future , 2012, 2012 Third International Conference on Emerging Security Technologies.

[10]  Koichi Osuka,et al.  USAR competitions for physically situated robots , 2002, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[11]  Kazuya Yoshida,et al.  Emergency response to the nuclear accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plants using mobile rescue robots , 2013, J. Field Robotics.

[12]  Goldie Nejat,et al.  Robotic Urban Search and Rescue: A Survey from the Control Perspective , 2013, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[13]  Adam Jacoff,et al.  Advancing the State of Urban Search and Rescue Robotics Through the RoboCupRescue Robot League Competition , 2012, FSR.

[14]  Paolo Fiorini,et al.  Search and Rescue Robotics , 2008, Springer Handbook of Robotics.

[15]  Jessie Y. C. Chen,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction , 2011, Hum. Factors.

[16]  Sharul Sham Dol,et al.  A Review on Marine Search and Rescue Operations Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2015 .

[17]  Mohiuddin Ahmed,et al.  Walking Hexapod Robot in Disaster Recovery: Developing Algorithm for Terrain Negotiation and Navigation , 2010 .

[18]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Evaluation of human-robot interaction awareness in search and rescue , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[19]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Disaster Robotics , 2014, Springer Handbook of Robotics, 2nd Ed..

[20]  Holly A. Yanco,et al.  Improved interfaces for human-robot interaction in urban search and rescue , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37583).

[21]  Frank E. Schneider,et al.  ELROB and EURATHLON: Improving search & rescue robotics through real-world robot competitions , 2015, 2015 10th International Workshop on Robot Motion and Control (RoMoCo).

[22]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Biologically-inspired locomotion of a 2g hexapod robot , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.