Failure Analysis of the Tripping Operation and its Impact on Well Control

As the cost of drilling and completion of offshore well is soaring, efforts are required for better well planning. Safety is to be given the highest priority over all other aspects of well planning. Among different element of drilling, well control is one of the most critical components for the safety of the operation, employees and the environment. Primary well control is ensured by keeping the hydrostatic pressure of the mud above the pore pressure across an open hole section. A loss of well control implies an influx of formation fluid into the wellbore which can culminate to a blowout if uncontrollable. Among the factors that contribute to a blowout are: stuck pipe, casing failure, swabbing, cementing, equipment failure and drilling into other well. Swabbing often occurs during tripping out of an open hole. In this study, investigations of the effects of tripping operation on primary well control are conducted. Failure scenarios of tripping operations in conventional overbalanced drilling and managed pressure drilling are studied using fault tree analysis. These scenarios are subsequently mapped into Bayesian Networks to overcome fault tree modelling limitations such s dependability assessment and common cause failure. The analysis of the BN models identified RCD failure, BHP reduction due to insufficient mud density and lost circulation, DAPC integrated control system, DAPC choke manifold, DAPC back pressure pump, and human error as critical elements in the loss of well control through tripping out operation.

[1]  Skalle Pal Pressure control during oil well drilling , 2014 .

[2]  Hilbert J. Kappen,et al.  Bayesian Networks for Expert Systems: Theory and Practical Applications , 2010, Interactive Collaborative Information Systems.

[3]  Brian Grayson,et al.  Closed Loop Circulating Systems Enhance Well Control and Efficiency With Precise Wellbore Monitoring and Management Capabilities , 2012 .

[4]  Keith K. Millheim,et al.  Applied Drilling Engineering , 1986 .

[5]  Luigi Portinale,et al.  Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping fault trees into Bayesian networks , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Koen van de Merwe,et al.  Human Reliability Analysis in Major Accident Risk Analyses in the Norwegian Petroleum Industry , 2012 .

[7]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Quantitative risk analysis of offshore drilling operations: A Bayesian approach , 2013 .

[8]  David Izon,et al.  Absence of fatalities in blowouts encouraging in MMS study of OCS incidents 1992-2006 , 2007 .

[9]  Stephen Butt,et al.  Safety and risk analysis of managed pressure drilling operation using Bayesian network , 2015 .

[10]  Nima Khakzad,et al.  Dynamic safety risk analysis of offshore drilling , 2014 .

[11]  E. P. Danenberger,et al.  Outer Continental Shelf Drilling Blowouts, 1971-1991 , 1993 .

[12]  Nima Khakzad,et al.  Risk-based safety analysis of well integrity operations , 2016 .

[13]  Bill Rehm,et al.  CHAPTER TWO – Situational Problems in MPD , 2008 .

[14]  Juan Carlos Beltran,et al.  Managed Pressure Drilling Brings Added Value to Production Casings Cementing Operations Increasing Success Rates and Quality in HPHT Fractured Narrow Window Wells , 2010 .

[15]  Paul Fredericks,et al.  CHAPTER THREE – Constant Bottom-Hole Pressure with Pressure as a Primary Control , 2008 .

[16]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into Bayesian network , 2013 .

[17]  Daniel A. Crowl,et al.  Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications , 2001 .