Forecasting household response in database marketing: A latent trait approach

Database marketers often select households for individual marketing contacts using information on past purchase behavior. One of the most common methods, known as RFM variables approach, ranks households according to three criteria: the recency of the latest purchase event, the long-run frequency of purchases, and the cumulative dollar expenditure. We argue that RFM variables approach is an indirect measure of the latent purchase propensity of the customer. In addition, the use of RFM information in targeting households creates major statistical problems (selection bias and RFM endogeneity) that complicate the calibration of forecasting models. Using a latent trait approach to capture a household's propensity to purchase a product, we construct a methodology that not only measures directly the latent propensity value of the customer, but also avoids the statistical limitations of the RFM variables approach. The result is a general household response forecasting and scoring approach that can be used on any database of customer transactions. We apply our methodology to a database from a charitable organization and show that the forecasting accuracy of the new methodology improves upon the traditional RFM variables approach.

[1]  Gary J. Russell,et al.  A Probabilistic Choice Model for Market Segmentation and Elasticity Structure , 1989 .

[2]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  On the Use of Structural Equation Models in Experimental Designs , 1989 .

[3]  Wagner A. Kamakura,et al.  Measuring Consumer Attitudes toward the Marketplace with Tailored Interviews , 1989 .

[4]  Jack Schmid,et al.  Desktop Database Marketing , 1998 .

[5]  Dennis L. Hoffman,et al.  An econometric analysis of the bank credit scoring problem , 1989 .

[6]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  The Value of Purchase History Data in Target Marketing , 1996 .

[7]  Jagdip Singh,et al.  Adaptive Designs for Likert-Type Data: An Approach for Implementing Marketing Surveys , 1990 .

[8]  Susana V. Mondschein,et al.  Mailing Decisions in the Catalog Sales Industry , 1996 .

[9]  J. R. Bult,et al.  Optimal Selection for Direct Mail , 1995 .

[10]  M. R. Novick,et al.  Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. , 1971 .

[11]  D. W.,et al.  Customer lifetime value: Marketing models and applications , 1998 .

[12]  Philip Hans Franses,et al.  Modeling charity donations: target selection, response time and gift size , 2000 .

[13]  J. Geweke,et al.  Contemporary Bayesian Econometrics and Statistics , 2005 .

[14]  Abel P. Jeuland,et al.  Brand Choice Inertia as One Aspect of the Notion of Brand Loyalty , 1979 .

[15]  Rajendra K. Srivastava,et al.  Coupon Attractiveness and Coupon Proneness: A Framework for Modeling Coupon Redemption , 1997 .

[16]  J. Heckman Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[17]  Adrian F. M. Smith,et al.  Sampling-Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities , 1990 .

[18]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Marketing models of consumer heterogeneity , 1998 .

[19]  John K Kruschke,et al.  Bayesian data analysis. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[20]  Pradeep K. Chintagunta,et al.  A model of inertia and variety-seeking with marketing variables , 1998 .

[21]  R. Srivastava,et al.  Applying Latent Trait Analysis in the Evaluation of Prospects For Cross-Selling of Financial Services , 1991 .

[22]  David Shepard Associates The New Direct Marketing: How to Implement A Profit-Driven Database Marketing Strategy , 1990 .

[23]  R. Winer A Framework for Customer Relationship Management , 2001 .

[24]  I. W. Molenaar,et al.  Rasch models: foundations, recent developments and applications , 1995 .

[25]  J. MacKinnon,et al.  Estimation and inference in econometrics , 1994 .

[26]  J. Powell,et al.  c ○ 2004 The Review of Economic Studies Limited Endogeneity in Semiparametric Binary Response Models , 2001 .

[27]  Füsun F. Gönül,et al.  Optimal Mailing of Catalogs: a New Methodology Using Estimable Structural Dynamic Programming Models , 1998 .

[28]  Hoon Kim,et al.  Monte Carlo Statistical Methods , 2000, Technometrics.