Exploiting Co-Occurrence of Low Frequent Terms in Patents

This paper investigates the role of co-occurrence of low frequent terms in patent classification. A comparison is made between indexing, weighting single term features and multi-term features based on low frequent terms. Three datasets are used for experimentation. An increase of almost 21 percent in classification accuracy is observed through experimentation when multi-term features based on low frequent terms in patents are considered as compared to when all word types are considered.

[1]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[2]  Xiangji Huang,et al.  TREC-CHEM: large scale chemical information retrieval evaluation at TREC , 2009, SIGF.

[3]  Abdul Rauf Baig,et al.  Ramp: High Performance Frequent Itemset Mining with Efficient Bit-Vector Projection Technique , 2006, PAKDD.

[4]  Jian Pei,et al.  Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation , 2000, SIGMOD 2000.

[5]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  Text Categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with Many Relevant Features , 1998, ECML.

[6]  Jae Dong Yang,et al.  Experiment with a Hierarchical Text Categorization Method on WIPO Patent Collections , 2005 .

[7]  A. Törcsvári,et al.  Automated categorization in the international patent classification , 2003, SIGF.

[8]  Yiming Yang,et al.  An Evaluation of Statistical Approaches to Text Categorization , 1999, Information Retrieval.

[9]  Gerhard Heyer,et al.  Significance of Low Frequent Terms in Patent Classification using IPC Hierarchy , 2011, IICS.

[10]  Gerard Salton,et al.  A vector space model for automatic indexing , 1975, CACM.

[11]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[12]  Tomasz Imielinski,et al.  Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases , 1993, SIGMOD Conference.

[13]  Jan Komorowski,et al.  Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery , 2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[14]  Fabrizio Sebastiani,et al.  Machine learning in automated text categorization , 2001, CSUR.

[15]  Yiming Yang,et al.  A re-examination of text categorization methods , 1999, SIGIR '99.

[16]  George Karypis,et al.  Centroid-Based Document Classification: Analysis and Experimental Results , 2000, PKDD.

[17]  Gerard Salton,et al.  Term-Weighting Approaches in Automatic Text Retrieval , 1988, Inf. Process. Manag..

[18]  Piotr Indyk,et al.  Enhanced hypertext categorization using hyperlinks , 1998, SIGMOD '98.

[19]  A. Zanasi.  Text Mining and its Applications to Intelligence, CRM and Knowledge Management , 2007 .

[20]  Céline Rouveirol,et al.  Machine Learning: ECML-98 , 1998, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[21]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Hierarchical classification of Web content , 2000, SIGIR '00.

[22]  David D. Lewis,et al.  Naive (Bayes) at Forty: The Independence Assumption in Information Retrieval , 1998, ECML.

[23]  Michelangelo Ceci,et al.  Classifying web documents in a hierarchy of categories: a comprehensive study , 2007, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[24]  Leah S. Larkey,et al.  A patent search and classification system , 1999, DL '99.