Governing by Numbers: Why Calculative Practices Matter

Sociologists are busy rediscovering the economy (Callon, 1998; Fligstein, 1990; Granovetter, 1985). The roles of networks that connect and form agents figure large in this revival of interest in the market as a social institution (Callon, 1998: 8). Until recently, however, little attention has been devoted in the sociological literature to the calculative practices that make the economy visible and measurable qua economy (Callon, 1998; Hopwood and Miller, 1994; Miller, 1998). In particular, the emergence and roles of the calculative practices of accounting have been overlooked or marginalized in the sociological literature. This paper calls for greater attention to these practices, and argues that it is important to examine their emergence, and the ways in which new calculative practices alter the capacities of agents, organizations, and the connections among them. It also examines how they alter the power relations that they shape and are embedded within, and how particular calculative practices enable new ways of acting upon and influencing the actions of individuals. Calculative practices, in other words, should be analyzed as "technologies of government" (Rose and Miller, 1992: 183) as the mechanisms through which programs of government are articulated and made operable. Rather than focusing on the ways in which the economy is shaped by economics, attention is directed at the ways in which accounting shapes social and economic relations.

[1]  Neil Fligstein,et al.  FROM THE TRANSFORMATION OF CORPORATE CONTROL , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[2]  Jonathon E. Mote,et al.  The laws of the markets , 2000 .

[3]  P. Miller The Margins of Accounting , 1998 .

[4]  A. Lafond,et al.  Trust in Numbers , 1995 .

[5]  Peter Miller,et al.  The Factory as Laboratory , 1994, Science in Context.

[6]  W. Bodmer Principles of Scientific Management , 1993, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[7]  N. Rose,et al.  Political power beyond the State: problematics of government. 1992. , 1992, The British journal of sociology.

[8]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  M. Dalton,et al.  Men Who Manage: Fusions of Feeling and Theory in Administration. , 1960 .

[10]  C. Barnard The Functions of the Executive , 1939 .

[11]  E. M. H. Lloyd,et al.  Experiments in state control : at the War Office and the Ministry of Food , 1925 .

[12]  W. Whyte Money and motivation , 2007 .

[13]  A. Hirschman The Passions and the Interests , 1997 .

[14]  Peter Miller,et al.  Accounting as social and institutional practice , 1996 .

[15]  F. Gilbreth,et al.  Motion study : a method for increasing the efficiency of the workman; And, Efficiency as a basis for operation and wages , 1993 .

[16]  Peter Miller,et al.  ACCOUNTING INNOVATION BEYOND THE ENTERPRISE: PROBLEMATIZING INVESTMENT DECISIONS AND PROGRAMMING... , 1991 .

[17]  A. Hopwood,et al.  The archeology of accounting systems , 1987 .

[18]  Anne Loft,et al.  Towards a critical understanding of accounting: The case of cost accounting in the U.K., 1914–1925☆ , 1986 .

[19]  Friedrich Engels,et al.  Capital : a critical analysis of capitalist production. , 1946 .