Optimizing the Combination of Acoustic and Electric Hearing in the Implanted Ear

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine an optimal approach to program combined acoustic plus electric (A+E) hearing devices in the same ear to maximize speech-recognition performance. Design: Ten participants with at least 1 year of experience using Nucleus Hybrid (short electrode) A+E devices were evaluated across three different fitting conditions that varied in the frequency ranges assigned to the acoustically and electrically presented portions of the spectrum. Real-ear measurements were used to optimize the acoustic component for each participant, and the acoustic stimulation was then held constant across conditions. The lower boundary of the electric frequency range was systematically varied to create three conditions with respect to the upper boundary of the acoustic spectrum: Meet, Overlap, and Gap programming. Consonant recognition in quiet and speech recognition in competing-talker babble were evaluated after participants were given the opportunity to adapt by using the experimental programs in their typical everyday listening situations. Participants provided subjective ratings and evaluations for each fitting condition. Results: There were no significant differences in performance between conditions (Meet, Overlap, Gap) for consonant recognition in quiet. A significant decrement in performance was measured for the Overlap fitting condition for speech recognition in babble. Subjective ratings indicated a significant preference for the Meet fitting regimen. Conclusions: Participants using the Hybrid ipsilateral A+E device generally performed better when the acoustic and electric spectra were programmed to meet at a single frequency region, as opposed to a gap or overlap. Although there is no particular advantage for the Meet fitting strategy for recognition of consonants in quiet, the advantage becomes evident for speech recognition in competing-talker babble and in patient preferences.

[1]  Anna Piotrowska,et al.  [New method of partial deafness treatment]. , 2003, Otolaryngologia polska = The Polish otolaryngology.

[2]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Hearing Conservation Surgery Using the Hybrid-L Electrode , 2009, Audiology and Neurotology.

[3]  Richard S Tyler,et al.  Benefits of localization and speech perception with multiple noise sources in listeners with a short-electrode cochlear implant. , 2010, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[4]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Unintelligible Low-Frequency Sound Enhances Simulated Cochlear-Implant Speech Recognition in Noise , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Preservation of Hearing in Cochlear Implant Surgery: Advantages of Combined Electrical and Acoustical Speech Processing , 2005, The Laryngoscope.

[6]  Michael K. Qin,et al.  Effects of introducing unprocessed low-frequency information on the reception of envelope-vocoder processed speech. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Richard Lippmann,et al.  Accurate consonant perception without mid-frequency speech energy , 1996, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..

[8]  Ilona Anderson,et al.  The Influence of Different Speech Processor and Hearing Aid Settings on Speech Perception Outcomes in Electric Acoustic Stimulation Patients , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[9]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Qian-Jie Fu,et al.  Perceptual learning following changes in the frequency-to-electrode assignment with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  C W Turner,et al.  Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Jerrica Kettel,et al.  Two Ears and Two (or More?) Devices: A Pediatric Case Study of Bilateral Profound Hearing Loss , 2009, Trends in amplification.

[13]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Combining acoustic and electrical speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus hybrid implant , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[14]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: How and why , 2005, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[15]  G Keidser,et al.  NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[16]  Michael F Dorman,et al.  Combining acoustic and electric stimulation in the service of speech recognition , 2010, International journal of audiology.

[17]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Integration of acoustic and electrical hearing. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[18]  Christopher Turner,et al.  Accuracy of Cochlear Implant Recipients on Pitch Perception, Melody Recognition, and Speech Reception in Noise , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[19]  C. Turner,et al.  High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Bruce J. Gantz,et al.  Acoustic plus Electric Speech Processing: Preliminary Results of a Multicenter Clinical Trial of the Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid Implant , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[21]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Impact of Hair Cell Preservation in Cochlear Implantation: Combined Electric and Acoustic Hearing , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[22]  Hugh J. McDermott,et al.  Comparison of two frequency-to-electrode maps for acoustic-electric stimulation , 2009, International journal of audiology.

[23]  U. Baumann,et al.  Pitch Matching Psychometrics in Electric Acoustic Stimulation , 2011, Ear and hearing.

[24]  Belinda A Henry,et al.  Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation of the Auditory System: Results of a Clinical Study , 2005, Audiology and Neurotology.

[26]  Bruce J. Gantz,et al.  Combined acoustic and electric hearing: Preserving residual acoustic hearing , 2008, Hearing Research.

[27]  J. Galvin,et al.  Perceptual Learning and Auditory Training in Cochlear Implant Recipients , 2007, Trends in amplification.

[28]  D Byrne,et al.  Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Combining acoustic and electrical hearing. , 2003, The Laryngoscope.

[30]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Cochlear Implant Speech Processor Frequency Allocations May Influence Pitch Perception , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[31]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[32]  Jan Kiefer,et al.  Conservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implantation , 2004, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[33]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Residual Hearing Conservation and Electroacoustic Stimulation with the Nucleus 24 Contour Advance Cochlear Implant , 2006, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[34]  C von Ilberg,et al.  Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. New technology for severe hearing loss. , 1999, ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties.

[35]  Jacob Oleson,et al.  Music Perception with Cochlear Implants and Residual Hearing , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[36]  Ilona Anderson,et al.  Electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a multi-centre investigation , 2008, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[37]  Philipos C. Loizou,et al.  Acoustic Simulations of Combined Electric and Acoustic Hearing (EAS) , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[38]  Ilona Anderson,et al.  Combined electric acoustic stimulation with the PULSARCI100 implant system using the FLEXEAS electrode array , 2011, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[39]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Temporal Bone Results and Hearing Preservation with a New Straight Electrode , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[40]  A. Faulkner,et al.  Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: implications for cochlear implants. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.