The American Heart Association's recommendations for expanding the applications of existing and future clinical registries: a policy statement from the American Heart Association.

Clinical registries play an important role in measuring healthcare delivery and supporting quality improvement for individuals with cardiovascular disease and stroke. Well-designed clinical registry programs provide important mechanisms to monitor patterns of care, evaluate healthcare effectiveness and safety, and improve clinical outcomes. The use of clinical registries is likely to grow given the increasing focus on measuring and improving healthcare delivery and patient outcomes by stakeholders in both the private and public sectors. The American Heart Association (AHA) has a longstanding commitment to promoting the innovative and effective use of clinical registries. The importance of clinical registries was highlighted recently in an AHA Scientific Statement on “Essential Features of a Surveillance System to Support the Prevention and Management of Heart Disease and Stroke” in the United States.1 This policy statement expands on the previous scientific statement by providing recommendations to policy makers and the healthcare community for expansion of the applications of existing and future clinical registries. The term “clinical registry” is defined here as an observational database of a clinical condition, procedure, therapy, or population in which there are often no registry-mandated approaches to therapy and relatively few inclusion or exclusion criteria. The focus of clinical registries is to capture data that reflect “real-world” clinical practice in large patient populations. The data from clinical registries do not replace the need for traditional randomized controlled trials. Rather, registries and trials are complementary approaches, each with unique advantages and imperfections.2 Such clinical registries do not solely contain claims or administrative data yet may be linked to such data sources. There are at least 3 classifications of clinical registries based on the patient population, including procedure/therapy/encounter-based, disease-based, and population-based registries. Registries also can be classified from a functional perspective, such as whether the registry is used to conduct clinical research, …

[1]  W. Baine,et al.  The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality , 2006, Italian Journal of Public Health.

[2]  Modern age until.  Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act , 2011 .

[3]  N. Dreyer,et al.  Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide , 2010 .

[4]  C. O'connor,et al.  Clinical Effectiveness of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Heart Failure , 2010, Circulation. Heart failure.

[5]  Yulei He,et al.  Missing data analysis using multiple imputation: getting to the heart of the matter. , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[6]  Health information technology: initial set of standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for electronic health record technology. Final rule. , 2010, Federal register.

[7]  Sowmya R. Rao,et al.  Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  H. Bueno,et al.  Patient Registries of Acute Coronary Syndrome: Assessing or Biasing the Clinical Real World Data? , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[9]  C. Cannon,et al.  Trends in the Use of Evidence-Based Treatments for Coronary Artery Disease Among Women and the Elderly: Findings From the Get With the Guidelines Quality-Improvement Program , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[10]  C. Yancy,et al.  Use of aldosterone antagonists in heart failure. , 2009, JAMA.

[11]  Adrian F Hernandez,et al.  Representativeness of a National Heart Failure Quality-of-Care Registry: Comparison of OPTIMIZE-HF and Non–OPTIMIZE-HF Medicare Patients , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[12]  David Shahian,et al.  Regulatory and ethical considerations for linking clinical and administrative databases. , 2009, American heart journal.

[13]  Adrian F Hernandez,et al.  Linking inpatient clinical registry data to Medicare claims data using indirect identifiers. , 2009, American heart journal.

[14]  L. Bardram,et al.  Validation of data and indicators in the Danish Cholecystectomy Database. , 2009, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[15]  Denys T. Lau,et al.  Health information technology and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: some of the challenges ahead. , 2009, Clinical therapeutics.

[16]  Eric L Eisenstein,et al.  Clinical effectiveness of coronary stents in elderly persons: results from 262,700 Medicare patients in the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  Lawrence O Gostin,et al.  Reforming the HIPAA Privacy Rule: safeguarding privacy and promoting research. , 2009, JAMA.

[18]  Laura A. Levit,et al.  Beyond the HIPAA Privacy Rule: Enhancing Privacy, Improving Health Through Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press , 2009 .

[19]  G. Fonarow,et al.  Clinical effectiveness of beta-blockers in heart failure: findings from the OPTIMIZE-HF (Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure) Registry. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  Li Liang,et al.  Get With the Guidelines–Stroke Is Associated With Sustained Improvement in Care for Patients Hospitalized With Acute Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack , 2009, Circulation.

[21]  A. Rabinstein.  Get With the Guidelines–Stroke Is Associated With Sustained Improvement in Care for Patients Hospitalized With Acute Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack , 2009 .

[22]  Grinding to a halt: the effects of the increasing regulatory burden on research and quality improvement efforts. , 2009, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[23]  Jürgen Stausberg,et al.  Foundations of a Metadata Repository for Databases of Registers and Trials , 2009, MIE.

[24]  Frederick A. Masoudi,et al.  Evaluating the Evidence: Is There a Rigid Hierarchy? , 2008, Circulation.

[25]  K. Alexander,et al.  Medical records and quality of care in acute coronary syndromes: results from CRUSADE. , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.

[26]  C. O'connor,et al.  Heart Failure Care in the Outpatient Cardiology Practice Setting: Findings From IMPROVE HF , 2008, Circulation. Heart failure.

[27]  M. Reeves,et al.  Inter-rater reliability of data elements from a prototype of the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry , 2008, BMC neurology.

[28]  B. Kuehn.  DHHS halts quality improvement study: policy may hamper tests of methods to improve care. , 2008, JAMA.

[29]  M. A. Baily,et al.  Harming through protection? , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  E. Emanuel,et al.  Quality-improvement research and informed consent. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  E. Haley.  Registries , 1959, Neurology.

[32]  R. Ness.  Influence of the HIPAA Privacy Rule on health research. , 2007, JAMA.

[33]  Johannes B Reitsma,et al.  Probabilistic record linkage is a valid and transparent tool to combine databases without a patient identification number. , 2007, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[34]  C. O'connor,et al.  Influence of a performance-improvement initiative on quality of care for patients hospitalized with heart failure: results of the Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure (OPTIMIZE-HF). , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[35]  Charles W. Given,et al.  Medicaid, Medicare, and the Michigan Tumor Registry: A Linkage Strategy , 2007, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[36]  Vincent Dor,et al.  Pioneers in cardiology: Vincent Dor, MD. Interview by Mark Nicholls. , 2007 .

[37]  Theodore Speroff,et al.  The Ethics of Using Quality Improvement Methods in Health Care , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[38]  F. Ahmed,et al.  Case completeness and data accuracy in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Program of Cancer Registries , 2007, Cancer.

[39]  S. Normand,et al.  Comparison of Clinical and Administrative Data Sources for Hospital Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Report Cards , 2007, Circulation.

[40]  W. Rosamond,et al.  Documentation of stroke onset time: challenges and recommendations. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[41]  T. Giordano,et al.  The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) privacy rule: implications for clinical research. , 2006, Annual review of medicine.

[42]  S de Lusignan,et al.  Quality and variability of osteoporosis data in general practice computer records: implications for disease registers. , 2005, Public health.

[43]  Brahmajee K Nallamothu,et al.  Potential impact of the HIPAA privacy rule on data collection in a registry of patients with acute coronary syndrome. , 2005, Archives of internal medicine.

[44]  M. Mack,et al.  Are unaudited records from an outcomes registry database accurate? , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[45]  Jack V Tu,et al.  Impracticability of informed consent in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[46]  R. Califf,et al.  Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA): must there be a trade-off between privacy and quality of health care, or can we advance both? , 2003, Circulation.

[47]  L. Grande,et al.  Quality control of the European Liver Transplant Registry: results of audit visits to the contributing centers , 2003, Transplantation.

[48]  J. H. van der Meulen,et al.  Assessing the quality of the data in a transplant registry: the European Liver Transplant Registry. , 2003, Transplantation.

[49]  J. Karlawish,et al.  Determining when quality improvement initiatives should be considered research: proposed criteria and potential implications. , 2000, JAMA.

[50]  L A Lillard,et al.  Linking Medicare and National Survey Data , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[51]  G. R. Solier.  U.S. NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS , 1967 .