A chemo-mechanical free-energy-based approach to model durotaxis and extracellular stiffness-dependent contraction and polarization of cells

We propose a chemo-mechanical model based on stress-dependent recruitment of myosin motors to describe how the contractility, polarization and strain in cells vary with the stiffness of their surroundings and their shape. A contractility tensor, which depends on the distribution of myosin motors, is introduced to describe the chemical free energy of the cell due to myosin recruitment. We explicitly include the contributions to the free energy that arise from mechanosensitive signalling pathways (such as the SFX, Rho-Rock and MLCK pathways) through chemo-mechanical coupling parameters. Taking the variations of the total free energy, which consists of the chemical and mechanical components, in accordance with the second law of thermodynamics provides equations for the temporal evolution of the active stress and the contractility tensor. Following this approach, we are able to recover the well-known Hill relation for active stresses, based on the fundamental principles of irreversible thermodynamics rather than phenomenology. We have numerically implemented our free energy-based approach to model spatial distribution of strain and contractility in (i) cells supported by flexible microposts, (ii) cells on two-dimensional substrates, and (iii) cells in three-dimensional matrices. We demonstrate how the polarization of the cells and the orientation of stress fibres can be deduced from the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the contractility tensor. Our calculations suggest that the chemical free energy of the cell decreases with the stiffness of the extracellular environment as the cytoskeleton polarizes in response to stress-dependent recruitment of molecular motors. The mechanical energy, which includes the strain energy and motor potential energy, however, increases with stiffness, but the overall energy is lower for cells in stiffer environments. This provides a thermodynamic basis for durotaxis, whereby cells preferentially migrate towards stiffer regions of the extracellular environment. Our models also explain, from an energetic perspective, why the shape of the cells can change in response to stiffness of the surroundings. The effect of the stiffness of the nucleus on its shape and the orientation of the stress fibres is also studied for all the above geometries. Along with making testable predictions, we have estimated the magnitudes of the chemo-mechanical coupling parameters for myofibroblasts based on data reported in the literature.

[1]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Direct comparisons of the morphology, migration, cell adhesions, and actin cytoskeleton of fibroblasts in four different three-dimensional extracellular matrices. , 2011, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[2]  D. Discher,et al.  Optimal matrix rigidity for stress fiber polarization in stem cells. , 2010, Nature physics.

[3]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[4]  B. Hinz,et al.  A new lock-step mechanism of matrix remodelling based on subcellular contractile events , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[5]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  The mechanical integrin cycle , 2009, Journal of Cell Science.

[6]  S. Ramaswamy,et al.  Hydrodynamics of soft active matter , 2013 .

[7]  Pascal Silberzan,et al.  Is the mechanical activity of epithelial cells controlled by deformations or forces? , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[8]  Marion Ghibaudo,et al.  Rigidity-driven growth and migration of epithelial cells on microstructured anisotropic substrates , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Force Sensing by Mechanical Extension of the Src Family Kinase Substrate p130Cas , 2006, Cell.

[10]  R. Burgkart,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of the cell nucleus. , 2000, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[11]  Tai-De Li,et al.  Mechanics and contraction dynamics of single platelets and implications for clot stiffening. , 2011, Nature materials.

[12]  D. Discher,et al.  Crawling from soft to stiff matrix polarizes the cytoskeleton and phosphoregulates myosin-II heavy chain , 2012, The Journal of cell biology.

[13]  J. Lammerding,et al.  Cellular mechanosensing: getting to the nucleus of it all. , 2014, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[14]  Marion Ghibaudo,et al.  Traction forces and rigidity sensing regulate cell functions , 2008 .

[15]  Thomas,et al.  Structure Myosin-II and Polymerization Filaments of Acanthamoeba , 2022 .

[16]  J. Morgan,et al.  Fibroblast elongation and dendritic extensions in constrained versus unconstrained microtissues. , 2009, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[17]  H. Mellor,et al.  Actin stress fibres , 2007, Journal of Cell Science.

[18]  J. Lammerding,et al.  Nuclear Mechanics and Mechanotransduction in Health and Disease , 2013, Current Biology.

[19]  K. Kaibuchi,et al.  Rho-Kinase–Mediated Contraction of Isolated Stress Fibers , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[20]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[21]  D. Ingber,et al.  Ultra-rapid activation of TRPV4 ion channels by mechanical forces applied to cell surface beta1 integrins. , 2010, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[22]  Takeo Matsumoto,et al.  Apical and Basal Stress Fibers have Different Roles in Mechanical Regulation of the Nucleus in Smooth Muscle Cells Cultured on a Substrate , 2013 .

[23]  Anthony G. Evans,et al.  A bio-chemo-mechanical model for cell contractility , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Sylvain Gabriele,et al.  Spatial coordination between cell and nuclear shape within micropatterned endothelial cells , 2012, Nature Communications.

[25]  R T Tranquillo,et al.  A finite element solution for the anisotropic biphasic theory of tissue-equivalent mechanics: the effect of contact guidance on isometric cell traction measurement. , 1997, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[26]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Single-cell response to stiffness exhibits muscle-like behavior , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Christopher S. Chen,et al.  Necking and failure of constrained 3D microtissues induced by cellular tension , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  O. Schmitt The heat of shortening and the dynamic constants of muscle , 2017 .

[29]  Toshio Yanagida,et al.  Sub-piconewton force fluctuations of actomyosin in vitro , 1991, Nature.

[30]  Frank Jülicher,et al.  Active gel physics , 2015, Nature Physics.

[31]  Thomas D. Pollard,et al.  Understanding cytokinesis: lessons from fission yeast , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[32]  R. McMeeking,et al.  The effect of remodelling and contractility of the actin cytoskeleton on the shear resistance of single cells: a computational and experimental investigation , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[33]  H. Frierson,et al.  Src and caveolin-1 reciprocally regulate metastasis via a common downstream signaling pathway in bladder cancer. , 2011, Cancer research.

[34]  G I Zahalak,et al.  A cell-based constitutive relation for bio-artificial tissues. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[35]  Pekka Lappalainen,et al.  Stress fibers are generated by two distinct actin assembly mechanisms in motile cells , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[36]  R T Tranquillo,et al.  An anisotropic biphasic theory of tissue-equivalent mechanics: the interplay among cell traction, fibrillar network deformation, fibril alignment, and cell contact guidance. , 1997, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[37]  Wesley R. Legant,et al.  Microfabricated tissue gauges to measure and manipulate forces from 3D microtissues , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Jan Lammerding,et al.  Broken nuclei--lamins, nuclear mechanics, and disease. , 2014, Trends in cell biology.

[39]  Anthony P. Napolitano,et al.  Rods, tori, and honeycombs: the directed self‐assembly of microtissues with prescribed microscale geometries , 2007, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[40]  K. Burridge,et al.  Focal adhesions, contractility, and signaling. , 1996, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[41]  Thomas Boudou,et al.  A Microfabricated Platform to Measure and Manipulate the Mechanics of Engineered Cardiac Microtissues , 2012 .

[42]  D. P. Nickerson,et al.  A model of cardiac cellular electromechanics , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.