It has been argued that many students view science as a collection of facts and terms to be memorized. Robert Yager (1983) analyzed secondary level science textbooks to determine vocabulary load and found that the amount of new vocabulary terms presented in such textbooks is higher than that recommended for junior high and high school foreign language courses. Three textbooks analyzed in that study were re-evaluated, taking into account limitations expressed in the earlier study. The new study also included analysis of an earth science textbook; the first study did not. The re-analysis produced a noticeable reduction in vocabulary load estimates with only one book, Modern Chemistry, still measuring above the recommended level for foreign language courses. It is argued that the amount of vocabulary load presented is still too high and may contribute to the problem of science avoidance by secondary students.
[1]
David M. Memory,et al.
Multiple Textbooks at Different Readability Levels in the Science Classroom
,
1991
.
[2]
Comments on “The importance of terminology in teaching K– 12 science”
,
1984
.
[3]
M. Linn,et al.
How do students' views of science influence knowledge integration?
,
1991
.
[4]
Jill D. Wright.
The Effect of Reduced Readability Text Materials on Comprehension and Biology Achievement.
,
1982
.
[5]
Robert E. Yager,et al.
The importance of terminology in teaching K-12 science
,
1983
.
[6]
Robert E. Yager,et al.
What Research Says to the Science Teacher
,
1978
.
[7]
T. Kuhn,et al.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.
,
1964
.
[8]
Donna Ogle.
K-W-L: A Teaching Model That Develops Active Reading of Expository Text.
,
1986
.