Acceptability of the Talking Touchscreen for Health Literacy Assessment

Self-administration of a multimedia health literacy measure in clinic settings is a novel concept. Demonstrated ease of use and acceptability will help predicate the future value of this strategy. We previously demonstrated the acceptability of a “Talking Touchscreen” for health status assessment. For this study, we adapted the touchscreen for self-administration of a new health literacy measure. Primary care patients (n = 610) in clinics for underserved populations completed health status and health literacy questions on the Talking Touchscreen and participated in an interview. Participants were 51% women, 10% age 60+, 67% African American, 18% without a high school education, and 14% without any prior computer experience. The majority (93%) had no difficulty using the touchscreen, including those who were computer-naïve (87%). Most rated the screen design as very good or excellent (72%), including computer-naïve patients (71%) and older patients (75%). Acceptability of the touchscreen did not differ by health literacy level. The Talking Touchscreen was easy to use and acceptable for self-administration of a new health literacy measure. Self-administration should reduce staff burden and costs, interview bias, and feelings of embarrassment by those with lower literacy. Tools like the Talking Touchscreen may increase exposure of underserved populations to new technologies.

[1]  Mark A. Kutner,et al.  The Health Literacy of America's Adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. NCES 2006-483. , 2006 .

[2]  James Butler,et al.  Speaking of Health: Assessing Health Communication, Strategies for Diverse Populations , 2005 .

[3]  E. Hahn,et al.  Bilingual health literacy assessment using the Talking Touchscreen/la Pantalla Parlanchina: Development and pilot testing. , 2009, Patient education and counseling.

[4]  Ben Gerber,et al.  eHealth Technology and Internet Resources: Barriers for Vulnerable Populations , 2004, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[5]  Mark V. Williams,et al.  Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults , 2016 .

[6]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  Information technology comes to medicine. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  L. Suggs A 10-Year Retrospective of Research in New Technologies for Health Communication , 2006, Journal of health communication.

[8]  Matthew W Kreuter,et al.  Use of Computer Kiosks for Breast Cancer Education in Five Community Settings , 2006, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[9]  David Cella,et al.  The talking touchscreen: A new approach to outcomes assessment in low literacy , 2004, Psycho-oncology.

[10]  B. Weiss,et al.  The impact of literacy on health-related quality of life measurement and outcomes in cancer outpatients , 2007, Quality of Life Research.

[11]  David A. Kindig,et al.  Health literacy : a prescription to end confusion , 2004 .

[12]  Quality of life assessment for low literacy Latinos: a new multimedia program for self-administration. , 2003, The Journal of oncology management : the official journal of the American College of Oncology Administrators.

[13]  D. Cella,et al.  Literacy-Fair Measurement of Health-Related Quality of Life Will Facilitate Comparative Effectiveness Research in Spanish-Speaking Cancer Outpatients , 2010, Medical care.

[14]  E. J. Mayeaux,et al.  Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. , 1993, Family medicine.

[15]  Improvement,et al.  Adult literacy in America : a first look at the results of the National Adult Literacy Survey , 1993 .