The structure and function of spontaneous analogising in domain-based problem solving

Laboratory-based studies of problem solving suggest that transfer of solution principles from an analogue to a target arises only minimally without the presence of directive hints. Recently, however, real-world studies indicate that experts frequently and spontaneously use analogies in domain-based problem solving. There is also some evidence that in certain circumstances domain novices can draw analogies designed to illustrate arguments. It is less clear, however, whether domain novices can invoke analogies in the sophisticated manner of experts to enable them to progress problem solving. In the current study groups of novices and experts tackled large-scale management problems. Spontaneous analogising was observed in both conditions, with no marked differences between expertise levels in the frequency, structure, or function of analogising. On average four analogies were generated by groups per hour, with significantly more relational mappings between analogue and target being produced than superficial object-and-attribute mappings. Analogising served two different purposes: problem solving (dominated by relational mappings), and illustration (which for novices was dominated by object-and-attribute mappings). Overall, our novices showed a sophistication in domain-based analogical reasoning that is usually only observed with experts, in addition to a sensitivity to the pragmatics of analogy use.

[1]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Pragmatics in Analogical Mapping , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  Wolfgang Bibel,et al.  The Representation of Knowledge , 1989 .

[3]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  The Role of Analogy in Teaching Middle-School Mathematics , 2019, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

[4]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge , 1978 .

[5]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy , 1983, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  D. Gentner,et al.  Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. , 1997 .

[7]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought , 1994 .

[8]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING , 1988 .

[9]  A. Newell.  Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[10]  B. Ross,et al.  Content Effects in Problem Categorization and Problem Solving , 1996 .

[11]  Michael S. Schadewald,et al.  The use of analogy in legal argument: problem similarity, precedent, and expertise , 1993 .

[12]  T. E. Lange,et al.  Below the Surface: Analogical Similarity and Retrieval Competition in Reminding , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  K. VanLehn.  Problem solving and cognitive skill acquisition , 1989 .

[14]  “Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge” , 1979 .

[15]  K. Dunbar,et al.  How analogies are generated: The roles of structural and superficial similarity , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[16]  C. Schunn,et al.  Priming, analogy, and awareness in complex reasoning , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[17]  K. Dunbar,et al.  The in vivo/in vitro approach to cognition: the case of analogy , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. , 1989 .

[20]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  The Pragmatics of Analogical Transfer , 1985 .

[21]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Analogy Use in Eighth-Grade Mathematics Classrooms , 2004 .

[22]  J. L. Smith,et al.  Semi-Structured Interviewing and Qualitative Analysis , 1995 .

[23]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Analogical problem solving , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[25]  Avron Barr,et al.  Representation of Knowledge , 1980 .

[26]  Mark T. Keane.  On Retrieving Analogues When Solving Problems , 1987 .

[27]  John Clement,et al.  Observed Methods for Generating Analogies in Scientific Problem Solving , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[28]  G. Halford.  Analogical Reasoning and Conceptual Complexity in Cognitive Development , 1992 .

[29]  Geoff Easton,et al.  LEARNING FROM CASE STUDIES , 1992 .

[30]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Dynamic Memory Revisited , 1999 .

[31]  Ken Plummer,et al.  Life Story Research , 1995 .

[32]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Learning and Memory: An Integrated Approach , 1994 .

[33]  John H. Holland,et al.  Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery , 1987, IEEE Expert.

[34]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[35]  T. Poze.  Analogical connections: the essence of creativity , 1983 .

[36]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  MAC/FAC: A Model of Similarity-Based Retrieval , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[37]  Gary Klein,et al.  Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions , 2017 .

[38]  L. Anolli,et al.  Accessing Source Information in Analogical Problem-Solving , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[39]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice , 1976 .

[40]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The use of diagrams in analogical problem solving , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[41]  J. Sweller.  Transfer Effects in a Problem Solving Context , 1980 .

[42]  Brian Falkenhainer,et al.  The Structure-Mapping Engine: Algorithm and Examples , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[43]  D. Gentner,et al.  Avoiding Missed Opportunities in Managerial Life: Analogical Training More Powerful Than Individual Case Training , 2000 .

[44]  K. Dunbar.  The analogical paradox: Why analogy is so easy in naturalistic settings yet so difficult in the psychological laboratory. , 2001 .

[45]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Analog Wetrieval by Constraint Satisfaction , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[46]  L. R. Novick.  Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[47]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  Spontaneous analogising in engineering design: a comparative analysis of experts and novices , 2004 .

[48]  K. Dunbar,et al.  Analogy use in naturalistic settings: The influence of audience, emotion, and goals , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[49]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  The Roles of Similarity in Transfer: Separating Retrievability From Inferential Soundness , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[50]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Component Processes in Analogical Reasoning. , 1977 .