Team Flow Is a Unique Brain State Associated with Enhanced Information Integration and Interbrain Synchrony

Team flow occurs when a group of people reaches high task engagement while sharing a common goal as in sports teams and music bands. While team flow is a superior enjoyable experience to individuals experiencing flow or regular socialization, the neural basis for such superiority is still unclear. Here, we addressed this question utilizing a music rhythm task and electroencephalogram hyper-scanning. Experimental manipulations held the motor task constant while disrupted the hedonic musical correspondence to blocking flow or occluded the partner’s body and task feedback to block social interaction. The manipulations’ effectiveness was confirmed using psychometric ratings and an objective measure for the depth of flow experience through the inhibition of the auditory-evoked potential to a task-irrelevant stimulus. Spectral power analysis revealed higher beta/gamma power specific to team flow at the left temporal cortex. Causal interaction analysis revealed that the left temporal cortex receives information from areas encoding individual flow or socialization. The left temporal cortex was also significantly involved in integrated information at both the intra- and inter-brains levels. Moreover, team flow resulted in enhanced global inter-brain integrated information and neural synchrony. Thus, our report presents neural evidence that team flow results in a distinct brain state and suggests a neurocognitive mechanism by which the brain creates this unique experience. Data Availability All data and analysis codes used in the preparation of this article are available at https://osf.io/3b4hp.

[1]  E. Hart,et al.  Combined flow in musical jam sessions: A pilot qualitative study , 2015 .

[2]  Mark R. Wilson,et al.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of the flow state. , 2017, Progress in brain research.

[3]  E. Redcay,et al.  Using second-person neuroscience to elucidate the mechanisms of social interaction , 2019, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  René Weber,et al.  Neural contributions to flow experience during video game playing. , 2012, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[5]  Tomas Knapen,et al.  Interregional alpha-band synchrony supports temporal cross-modal integration , 2014, NeuroImage.

[6]  Ikuya Sato Optimal experience: Bosozoku : flow in Japanese motorcycle gangs , 1988 .

[7]  R. B. Reilly,et al.  FASTER: Fully Automated Statistical Thresholding for EEG artifact Rejection , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[8]  Y. Yamaguchi,et al.  Inter-brain synchronization during coordination of speech rhythm in human-to-human social interaction , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[9]  Larissa Albantakis,et al.  From the Phenomenology to the Mechanisms of Consciousness: Integrated Information Theory 3.0 , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[10]  C. J. Walker Experiencing flow: Is doing it together better than doing it alone? , 2010 .

[11]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Brain-to-Brain Synchrony Tracks Real-World Dynamic Group Interactions in the Classroom , 2017, Current Biology.

[12]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Applications of Flow in Human Development and Education , 2014 .

[13]  M. Kaminski,et al.  Determination of information flow direction among brain structures by a modified directed transfer function (dDTF) method , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  N. Hao,et al.  Cooperation Makes a Group be More Creative. , 2018, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  P. Welch The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms , 1967 .

[16]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Toward a Neural Basis for Social Behavior , 2013, Neuron.

[17]  Luiz A. Baccalá,et al.  Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[18]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. , 1988 .

[19]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Cortical functional network organization from autoregressive modeling of local field potential oscillations , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[20]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB, SIFT, NFT, BCILAB, and ERICA: New Tools for Advanced EEG Processing , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[21]  Georg Grön,et al.  Neural signatures of experimentally induced flow experiences identified in a typical fMRI block design with BOLD imaging. , 2016, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[22]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Brain regions with mirror properties: A meta-analysis of 125 human fMRI studies , 2012, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[23]  Claus Lamm,et al.  Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain , 2011, NeuroImage.

[24]  Jon R. Katzenbach,et al.  The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization , 1992 .

[25]  Fredrik Ullén,et al.  Flow Experience : Empirical Research and Applications , 2016 .

[26]  J. Geweke,et al.  Measurement of Linear Dependence and Feedback between Multiple Time Series , 1982 .

[27]  Bruce Fischl,et al.  Within-subject template estimation for unbiased longitudinal image analysis , 2012, NeuroImage.

[28]  F. Varela,et al.  Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[29]  G. Tononi An information integration theory of consciousness , 2004, BMC Neuroscience.

[30]  P. Allen,et al.  A systematic review of multisensory cognitive–affective integration in schizophrenia , 2015, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[31]  Peter E. Clayson,et al.  How does noise affect amplitude and latency measurement of event-related potentials (ERPs)? A methodological critique and simulation study. , 2013, Psychophysiology.

[32]  Line Garnero,et al.  Inter-Brain Synchronization during Social Interaction , 2010, PloS one.

[33]  J. Price,et al.  The organization of networks within the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex of rats, monkeys and humans. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  Guillaume Dumas,et al.  Brain-to-brain coupling during handholding is associated with pain reduction , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  J. Katzenbach,et al.  The discipline of teams. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[36]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  The dynamics of error processing in the human brain as reflected by high-gamma activity in noninvasive and intracranial EEG , 2017, NeuroImage.

[37]  R. Burkard Human Auditory Evoked Potentials , 2010 .

[38]  Clemens Brunner,et al.  Eeglab – an Open Source Matlab Toolbox for Electrophysiological Research , 2013, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[39]  Viktor Müller,et al.  Intra- and interbrain synchronization and network properties when playing guitar in duets , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[40]  Rebecca Saxe,et al.  fMRI item analysis in a theory of mind task , 2011, NeuroImage.

[41]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature , 2010, NeuroImage.

[42]  Christiane Waller,et al.  Neural correlates of experimentally induced flow experiences , 2014, NeuroImage.

[43]  M. Yartsev,et al.  Correlated Neural Activity across the Brains of Socially Interacting Bats , 2019, Cell.

[44]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Interpersonal body and neural synchronization as a marker of implicit social interaction , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[45]  Daniel P. Kennedy,et al.  The social brain in psychiatric and neurological disorders , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A systematic framework for functional connectivity measures , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[47]  M. Tervaniemi,et al.  Naturalistic music and dance: Cortical phase synchrony in musicians and dancers , 2018, PloS one.

[48]  K. Pelphrey,et al.  An integrative neural model of social perception, action observation, and theory of mind , 2015, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[49]  J. Keller,et al.  Dorsal Raphe Nucleus Down-Regulates Medial Prefrontal Cortex during Experience of Flow , 2016, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[50]  W. Singer,et al.  Neural Synchrony in Brain Disorders: Relevance for Cognitive Dysfunctions and Pathophysiology , 2006, Neuron.

[51]  R. Hari,et al.  Centrality of Social Interaction in Human Brain Function , 2015, Neuron.

[52]  Marisa Salanova,et al.  Flowing Together: A Longitudinal Study of Collective Efficacy and Collective Flow Among Workgroups , 2014, The Journal of psychology.

[53]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Brainstorm: A User-Friendly Application for MEG/EEG Analysis , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[54]  Stefan Debener,et al.  Source-Modeling Auditory Processes of EEG Data Using EEGLAB and Brainstorm , 2018, Front. Neurosci..

[55]  Théodore Papadopoulo,et al.  OpenMEEG: opensource software for quasistatic bioelectromagnetics , 2010, Biomedical engineering online.

[56]  Larissa Albantakis,et al.  PyPhi: A toolbox for integrated information theory , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[57]  Fabian Pels,et al.  Group flow: A scoping review of definitions, theoretical approaches, measures and findings , 2018, PloS one.

[58]  David Engel,et al.  Integrated information as a metric for group interaction , 2017, PloS one.

[59]  R. Spencer Group Genius: The Creative Power of Collaboration , 2008 .

[60]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Analyzing Neural Time Series Data: Theory and Practice , 2014 .

[61]  Michael Eickenberg,et al.  Machine learning for neuroimaging with scikit-learn , 2014, Front. Neuroinform..

[62]  T W Picton,et al.  Human auditory evoked potentials. II. Effects of attention. , 1974, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[63]  Shu-Chen Li,et al.  Brains swinging in concert: cortical phase synchronization while playing guitar , 2009, BMC Neuroscience.