RECREATIONAL FISHING AND MARINE FISH POPULATIONS IN CALIFORNIA

We present and review information regarding recreational angling and exploited marine fish populations in California. A comparison of rockfish assemblages among three differently fished areas (one open to all fishing, another open only to recreational fishing, and a de facto marine protected area) revealed large differences in fish density, size structure, and species composition. The area open to all fishing harbored the highest density of rockfishes (7,212 fish/ha), although the size structure and species composition were dominated by small fishes. The area open only to recreational fishing had the lowest rockfish density (423 fish/ha) and a size structure also dominated by small fishes. The de facto protected area possessed high fish density (5,635 fish/ha), but here the size structure and species composition shifted toward larger fishes compared with the two fished areas. Two species federally listed as overfished, cowcod and bocaccio, had 32-fold and 408-fold higher densities, respectively, in the de facto reserve than observed inside the recreational fishing area, and 8-fold and 18-fold higher densities, respectively, than observed in the area open to all fishing. For 17 nearshore fish species, we compared landings by recreational anglers and commercial harvesters and found that, for 16 species, recreational angling was the primary source of fishing mortality. We illustrate the potential damaging effects of mortality associated with catch-and-release programs on long-lived fish populations. Based on this information, we recommend that legislators and natural resource managers reject the assumption that recreational fishing is a low or no impact activity until specific studies can demonstrate otherwise.

[1]  R. Cowen.  Large scale pattern of recruitment by the labrid, semicossyphus pulcher: causes and implications , 1985 .

[2]  R. Sluka,et al.  The influence of spear fishing on species composition and size of groupers on patch reefs in the upper Florida keys , 1998 .

[3]  Jm Hoenig,et al.  Empirical use of longevity data to estimate mortality rates , 1983 .

[4]  J. Pinnegar,et al.  Trophic cascades in benthic marine ecosystems: lessons for fisheries and protected-area management , 2000, Environmental Conservation.

[5]  M. Love.  Probably More Than You Want to Know About the Fishes of the Pacific Coast , 1991 .

[6]  Fish Bulletin 176. The Marine Recreational Fishery In Northern and Central California : A Historical Comparison (1958–86), Status of Stocks (1980–86), and Effects of Changes In The California Current , 1995 .

[7]  C. Buxton,et al.  The biology of the white musselcracker Sparodon durbanensis (Pisces: Sparidae) on the Eastern Cape coast, South Africa , 1991 .

[8]  Maurice I. Muoneke,et al.  Hooking mortality: A review for recreational fisheries , 1994 .

[9]  B. Bennett.  The fishery for white steenbras Lithognathus lithognathus off the Cape coast, South Africa, with some considerations for its management , 1993 .

[10]  B. Leaman.  Reproductive styles and life history variables relative to exploitation and management of Sebastes stocks , 1991 .

[11]  I. Ernst,et al.  Hooking mortality of two species of shallow-water reef fish caught by recreational angling methods , 1997 .

[12]  G. Boehlert.  Biodiversity and the Sustainability of Marine Fisheries , 1996 .

[13]  J. Caselle,et al.  Declines in nearshore rockfish recruitment and populations in the southern California Bight as measured by impingement rates in coastal electrical power generating stations , 1998 .

[14]  P. Dayton,et al.  Reversal of the Burden of Proof in Fisheries Management , 1998, Science.

[15]  M. Love.  Aspects of the Life History of the Olive Rockfish, Sebastes serranoides , 1978 .

[16]  R. R. Wilson,et al.  Potential survival of released groupers caught deeper than 40 m based on shipboard and in-situ observations, and tag-recapture data , 1996 .

[17]  Simon Jennings,et al.  Conservation benefits of marine reserves for fish populations , 2000 .

[18]  C. Walters,et al.  Uncertainty, resource exploitation, and conservation: lessons from history. , 1993, Science.

[19]  H. G. Mosek,et al.  ABUNDANCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF ROCKFISH (SEBASTES) LARVAE IN THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BIGHT IN RELATION TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND FISHERY EXPLOITATION , 2000 .

[20]  J. Estes,et al.  KELP FOREST FISH POPULATIONS IN MARINE RESERVES AND ADJACENT EXPLOITED AREAS OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA , 2000 .

[21]  Robert J. Hofman,et al.  Environmental effects of marine fishing , 1995 .

[22]  M. L. Renaud,et al.  Field Experiments on Survival Rates of Caged and Released Red Snapper , 1994 .

[23]  G. H. Clark,et al.  A Method of Collecting Statistics of Marine Sport Catches in California , 1933 .

[24]  M. Yoklavich,et al.  Habitat associations of deep-water rockfi shes in a submarine canyon: an example of a natural refuge , 2000 .

[25]  B. Wise,et al.  A tagging study on tailor (Pomatomus saltatrix) in Western Australian waters: their movement, exploitation, growth and mortality , 1999 .

[26]  J. Hutchings.  Collapse and recovery of marine fishes , 2000, Nature.

[27]  A. Hollowed,et al.  Pacific Basin climate variability and patterns of Northeast Pacific marine fish production , 2001 .

[28]  D. Pollard,et al.  Some effects of marine reserve protection on the population structure of two spearfishing target-fish species, Dicentrarchus labrax (Moronidae) and Sparus aurata (Sparidae), in shallow inshore waters, along a rocky coast in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea , 2001 .