MR Imaging Radiomics Signatures for Predicting the Risk of Breast Cancer Recurrence as Given by Research Versions of MammaPrint, Oncotype DX, and PAM50 Gene Assays.

Purpose To investigate relationships between computer-extracted breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging phenotypes with multigene assays of MammaPrint, Oncotype DX, and PAM50 to assess the role of radiomics in evaluating the risk of breast cancer recurrence. Materials and Methods Analysis was conducted on an institutional review board-approved retrospective data set of 84 deidentified, multi-institutional breast MR examinations from the National Cancer Institute Cancer Imaging Archive, along with clinical, histopathologic, and genomic data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. The data set of biopsy-proven invasive breast cancers included 74 (88%) ductal, eight (10%) lobular, and two (2%) mixed cancers. Of these, 73 (87%) were estrogen receptor positive, 67 (80%) were progesterone receptor positive, and 19 (23%) were human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive. For each case, computerized radiomics of the MR images yielded computer-extracted tumor phenotypes of size, shape, margin morphology, enhancement texture, and kinetic assessment. Regression and receiver operating characteristic analysis were conducted to assess the predictive ability of the MR radiomics features relative to the multigene assay classifications. Results Multiple linear regression analyses demonstrated significant associations (R2 = 0.25-0.32, r = 0.5-0.56, P < .0001) between radiomics signatures and multigene assay recurrence scores. Important radiomics features included tumor size and enhancement texture, which indicated tumor heterogeneity. Use of radiomics in the task of distinguishing between good and poor prognosis yielded area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.88 (standard error, 0.05), 0.76 (standard error, 0.06), 0.68 (standard error, 0.08), and 0.55 (standard error, 0.09) for MammaPrint, Oncotype DX, PAM50 risk of relapse based on subtype, and PAM50 risk of relapse based on subtype and proliferation, respectively, with all but the latter showing statistical difference from chance. Conclusion Quantitative breast MR imaging radiomics shows promise for image-based phenotyping in assessing the risk of breast cancer recurrence. © RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

[1]  M. Cronin,et al.  A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Li Lan,et al.  Pilot study demonstrating potential association between breast cancer image-based risk phenotypes and genomic biomarkers. , 2014, Medical physics.

[3]  M. Cronin,et al.  Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  Maryellen Giger,et al.  Computerized three-class classification of MRI-based prognostic markers for breast cancer , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Yudong D. He,et al.  Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer , 2002, Nature.

[6]  A. Nobel,et al.  Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Stephen M. Moore,et al.  The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[8]  Eun-Kyung Kim,et al.  Triple-negative invasive breast cancer on dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with other breast cancer subtypes , 2012, European Radiology.

[9]  Li Lan,et al.  Computerized assessment of breast lesion malignancy using DCE-MRI robustness study on two independent clinical datasets from two manufacturers. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[10]  Lihua Li,et al.  A computerized global MR image feature analysis scheme to assist diagnosis of breast cancer: a preliminary assessment. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[11]  Lorenzo L. Pesce,et al.  Reliable and computationally efficient maximum-likelihood estimation of "proper" binormal ROC curves. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[12]  A. Madabhushi,et al.  Computerized image analysis for identifying triple-negative breast cancers and differentiating them from other molecular subtypes of breast cancer on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: a feasibility study. , 2014, Radiology.

[13]  C. Perou,et al.  PAM 50 assay and the three-gene model for identifying the major and clinically relevant molecular subtypes of breast cancer , 2012 .

[14]  M. Cronin,et al.  Analytical validation of the Oncotype DX genomic diagnostic test for recurrence prognosis and therapeutic response prediction in node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. , 2007, Clinical chemistry.

[15]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis: Draper/Applied Regression Analysis , 1998 .

[16]  Maryellen L. Giger,et al.  A Fuzzy C-Means (FCM)-Based Approach for Computerized Segmentation of Breast Lesions in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Images1 , 2006 .

[17]  M. Giger,et al.  Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance images , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  Maryellen L Giger,et al.  Update on the potential of computer-aided diagnosis for breast cancer. , 2010, Future oncology.

[19]  Daniel L. Rubin,et al.  The National Cancer Informatics Program (NCIP) Annotation and Image Markup (AIM) Foundation Model , 2014, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[20]  M. Giger,et al.  A fuzzy c-means (FCM)-based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[21]  Wei Tse Yang,et al.  Identification of Intrinsic Imaging Phenotypes for Breast Cancer Tumors: Preliminary Associations with Gene Expression Profiles , 2015 .

[22]  M. Giger,et al.  Breast image analysis for risk assessment, detection, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer. , 2013, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[23]  Zhimin Huo,et al.  Computerized analysis of digitized mammograms of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. , 2002, Radiology.

[24]  A. Nobel,et al.  Concordance among Gene-Expression – Based Predictors for Breast Cancer , 2011 .

[25]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2013 .

[26]  C. Metz,et al.  "Proper" Binormal ROC Curves: Theory and Maximum-Likelihood Estimation. , 1999, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[27]  B. Weber,et al.  Recent advances in breast cancer biology , 1998, Current opinion in oncology.

[28]  Yufeng Liu,et al.  Building prognostic models for breast cancer patients using clinical variables and hundreds of gene expression signatures , 2011, BMC Medical Genomics.

[29]  M. Giger,et al.  Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI. , 2006, Medical physics.

[30]  M. Giger,et al.  Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM. , 2008, Medical physics.

[31]  M L Giger,et al.  Computerized analysis of breast lesions in three dimensions using dynamic magnetic-resonance imaging. , 1998, Medical physics.

[32]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[33]  Richard F. Gunst,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1999, Technometrics.

[34]  C. Fan,et al.  PAM50 assay and the three-gene model for identifying the major and clinically relevant molecular subtypes of breast cancer , 2012, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[35]  B. Weber,et al.  Recent advances in breast cancer biology. , 1995 .

[36]  Yong-jie Lu,et al.  Experimental pathology and breast cancer genetics: new technologies. , 1998, Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer.

[37]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized interpretation of breast MRI: investigation of enhancement-variance dynamics. , 2004, Medical physics.

[38]  Hui Li,et al.  Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2mutation status: a cross-sectional study , 2014, Breast Cancer Research.

[39]  Ahmed Bilal Ashraf,et al.  Identification of intrinsic imaging phenotypes for breast cancer tumors: preliminary associations with gene expression profiles. , 2014, Radiology.

[40]  M. Giger,et al.  Cancerous breast lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: computerized characterization for image-based prognostic markers. , 2010, Radiology.

[41]  Maciej A Mazurowski,et al.  Radiogenomic analysis of breast cancer: luminal B molecular subtype is associated with enhancement dynamics at MR imaging. , 2014, Radiology.

[42]  Maryellen L. Giger,et al.  Computerized Analysis of Mammographic Parenchymal Patterns on a Large Clinical Dataset of Full-Field Digital Mammograms: Robustness Study with Two High-Risk Datasets , 2012, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[43]  Van,et al.  A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[44]  C E Metz,et al.  The "proper" binormal model: parametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimation with degenerate data. , 1997, Academic radiology.

[45]  T. Eberlein A Multigene Assay to Predict Recurrence of Tamoxifen-Treated, Node-Negative Breast Cancer , 2006 .

[46]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumors , 2012, Nature.