Organisational Narratives of Applied Knowledge in Technology-Based Organisations

This paper presents the conclusions of four case studies in technology-based (TB) organisations. These companies have a strong international presence and also represent success-stories of Portuguese innovation, covering the 1980s through to the 2000s. Using a qualitative approach, the authors pinpoint the critical success factors that made these companies a reference in terms of innovation. These cases were chosen as they all recount the successful application of sustainable innovation in social processes to organisations. The research question was: What are the key factors that drive innovation processes in successful Portuguese technology-based organisations? Results show that the lessons learned from narratives of innovation play an instrumental role in the comprehension of social interaction complexities. Furthermore, the study identifies several management practices that highlight the significance of the players involved in innovation. The findings show that a passion for knowledge and its productive applications are key differentiating factors.

[1]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[2]  Jorge F. S. Gomes,et al.  Critical success factors for cross‐functional teamwork in new product development , 2000 .

[3]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[4]  Raghu Garud,et al.  The Role of Narratives in Sustaining Organizational Innovation , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[5]  George Kuk,et al.  The team climate inventory (TCI) - four or five factors? Testing the structure of TCI in samples of low and high complexity jobs , 1997 .

[6]  Harri Jalonen The Uncertainty of Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2011 .

[7]  Dennis Duchon,et al.  Perceptions of an innovative climate: examining the role of divisional affiliation, work group interaction, and leader/subordinate exchange , 1992 .

[8]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Resource-based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms , 1996 .

[9]  S. Scott,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE , 1994 .

[10]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Organizational Identity, Image, and Adaptive Instability , 2000 .

[11]  R. Chun Innovation and Reputation: An Ethical Character Perspective , 2006 .

[12]  Polly S. Rizova,et al.  The Meaning of Success: Network Position and the Social Construction of Project Outcomes in an R&D Lab , 2004 .

[13]  J. Dickson,et al.  R&D Work Climate and Innovation in Semiconductors , 1983 .

[14]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Methods for Studying Innovation Development in the Minnesota Innovation Research Program , 1990 .

[15]  James M. Utterback,et al.  The Effects of Communication on Technological Innovation , 1984 .

[16]  A. Neely,et al.  Networking and Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Evidence , 2004 .

[17]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Knowledge for Theory and Practice , 2006 .