The N2 in go/no-go tasks reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition

The functional significance of the N2 in go/no-go tasks was investigated by comparing electrophysiological data obtained from two tasks: a go/no-go task involving both response inhibition as well as response conflict monitoring, and a go/GO task associated with conflict monitoring only. No response was required to no-go stimuli, and a response with maximal force to GO stimuli. The relative frequency of the go stimuli (80% vs. 50%) was varied. The N2 peaked on both no-go and GO trials, with larger amplitudes for both signals when presented in a context of frequent (80%) go signals. These results support the idea that the N2 reflects conflict monitoring not response inhibition.

[1]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[2]  J. Ford,et al.  ERPs to response production and inhibition. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Error processing and the rostral anterior cingulate: an event-related fMRI study. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[4]  B. Kopp,et al.  N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. , 2004, Psychological review.

[6]  M. M. van den Berg-Lenssen,et al.  Correction of ocular artifacts in EEGs using an autoregressive model to describe the EEG; a pilot study. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Stimulus modality, perceptual overlap, and the go/no-go N2. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[8]  M. Posner,et al.  Localization of a Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1994 .

[9]  K. J. Bruin,et al.  Response priming in a go/nogo task: do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition? , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[10]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a Go/Nogo task , 1993, Biological Psychology.

[11]  D. Meyer,et al.  A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1993 .

[12]  Patrick Rabbitt,et al.  Processing a Display Even after you Make a Response to it. How Perceptual Errors can be Corrected , 1981, Cognitive Development and the Ageing Process.

[13]  E. Jodo,et al.  Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[15]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[16]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. , 1998, Science.

[17]  B. J. Casey,et al.  Regional brain activity when selecting a response despite interference: An H2 15O PET study of the stroop and an emotional stroop , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[18]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Working memory and executive control. , 1996, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[19]  J. Thayer,et al.  The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: a multivariate solution. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[20]  A. A. Wijers,et al.  Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: a comparative event-related potential study , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[21]  T. Shallice,et al.  A Multidisciplinary Approach to Anterior Attentional Functions a , 1995, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[22]  A. Kok Effects of degradation of visual stimuli on components of the event-related potential (ERP) in go/nogo reaction tasks , 1986, Biological Psychology.

[23]  A. Nambu,et al.  No-go activity in the frontal association cortex of human subjects , 1993, Neuroscience Research.

[24]  E. Donchin,et al.  Event-related brain potentials and error-related processing: an analysis of incorrect responses to go and no-go stimuli. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[25]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action , 1986 .

[26]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. , 2002, Psychological review.

[27]  F. Vidal,et al.  Is the ‘error negativity’ specific to errors? , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[28]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  A computational model of anterior cingulate function in speeded response tasks: Effects of frequency, sequence, and conflict , 2002, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[29]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Donders's assumption of pure insertion: an evaluation on the basis of response dynamics , 1999 .

[30]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex , 1999, Nature.

[31]  T. Braver,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of frequency, inhibition and errors. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  M. W. Molen,et al.  A psychophysiological analysis of inhibitory motor control in the stop-signal paradigm , 2001, Biological Psychology.

[33]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency , 2003, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[34]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[35]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  Structure and Functions of the Human Prefrontal Cortex , 1996 .

[36]  T. Carr,et al.  Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language , 1994 .

[37]  G. Schwartz,et al.  Consciousness and Self-Regulation , 1976 .

[38]  K. Sasaki,et al.  Suppression of visually initiated hand movement by stimulation of the prefrontal cortex in the monkey , 1989, Brain Research.

[39]  C. Carter,et al.  The Timing of Action-Monitoring Processes in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[41]  T. Braver,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of response modality and processing domain. , 2001, Cerebral Cortex.

[42]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[43]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Error-related scalp potentials elicited by hand and foot movements: evidence for an output-independent error-processing system in humans , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[44]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[46]  W. Gehring,et al.  Functions of the Medial Frontal Cortex in the Processing of Conflict and Errors , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.