SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS UPDATES

There are numerous indirect ways in which socioeconomic status (SES) can advantage or disadvantage people in developing social capital. Specifically, SES affects the access individuals have to beneficial resources that indirectly affects the social capital benefits individuals receive from personal and group social networks. With the advent of social network sites like Facebook, the ability to quantify and measure the effects of SES on social capital benefits is possible to a much greater degree than ever before. This study of undergraduate students focuses on the relationship between SES and social capital. We examine the relationship between SES and three structural measures of students' social capital using online social network data: general social capital (network size), bridging social capital (number of clusters), and bonding social capital (average degree). According to our results, higher SES relates to larger and denser networks, but not to networks with more clusters. These findings suggest that SES is not related to greater opportunities for networking, but better capitalization of existing network contexts. In addition to the novel substantive contribution, this paper offers a methodological advance in the structural study of social capital, which has previously been limited in size or complexity due to recall.

[1]  David R. Williams,et al.  Us socioeconomic and racial differences in health: patterns and explanations , 1995 .

[2]  W. Dutton,et al.  Oxford Internet Survey 2007 Report: The Internet in Britain , 2007 .

[3]  S. Dika,et al.  Applications of Social Capital in Educational Literature: A Critical Synthesis , 2002 .

[4]  A. Portes.  Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[5]  T. E. Smith,et al.  Socioeconomic Stratification in Family Research. , 1995 .

[6]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  Ken Wakita,et al.  Finding community structure in mega-scale social networks: [extended abstract] , 2007, WWW '07.

[8]  J. Richardson.  Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education , 1986 .

[9]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World , 2010 .

[10]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Whose Space? Differences Among Users and Non-Users of Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[11]  C. Nam,et al.  Variations in Socioeconomic Structure by Race, Residence, and the Life Cycle , 1965 .

[12]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[13]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[14]  N. Ellison,et al.  Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis , 2008 .

[15]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices , 2011, New Media Soc..

[16]  Kerk F. Kee,et al.  Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?: Facebook Use and College Students’ Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation 1 , 2009 .

[17]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[18]  Bernie Hogan,et al.  A Comparison of On and Offline Networks through the Facebook API , 2008 .

[19]  William Carbonaro,et al.  After the Bell , 2010 .

[20]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  K. Karahalios,et al.  The Network in the Garden: Designing Social Media for Rural Life , 2010 .

[22]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[23]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications , 1993 .

[24]  Bernie Hogan.  Chapter 11 – Visualizing and Interpreting Facebook Networks , 2011 .

[25]  Marco Gonzalez,et al.  Author's Personal Copy Social Networks Tastes, Ties, and Time: a New Social Network Dataset Using Facebook.com , 2022 .

[26]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Internet adoption and usage patterns are different: Implications for the digital divide , 2008, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[27]  Charles W. Mueller,et al.  Measures of socioeconomic status: Alternatives and recommendations. , 1981 .

[28]  Alain Degenne.  Social capital: a theory of social structure and action , 2004 .

[29]  J. R. Warren,et al.  4. Socioeconomic Indexes for Occupations: A Review, Update, and Critique , 1997 .

[30]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in very large networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[31]  N. Lin.  Social Capital: Frontmatter , 2001 .

[32]  P. Bourdieu.  Forms of Capital , 2002 .

[33]  Matthew E. Brashears,et al.  Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades , 2006 .

[34]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[35]  Tore Opsahl,et al.  Growth mechanisms in continuously-observed networks: Communication in a Facebook-like community , 2010, ArXiv.

[36]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  A face(book) in the crowd: social Searching vs. social browsing , 2006, CSCW '06.

[37]  O. D. Duncan,et al.  Socioeconomic Background and Achievement. , 1974 .

[38]  L. Hawkley,et al.  Social isolation , 2011, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[39]  I. Kawachi,et al.  Social capital, income inequality, and mortality. , 1997, American journal of public health.

[40]  Michael J. Stern,et al.  Digital Inequality and Place: The Effects of Technological Diffusion on Internet Proficiency and Usage across Rural, Suburban, and Urban Counties , 2009 .

[41]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Visualizing Personal Networks: Working with Participant-aided Sociograms , 2007 .

[42]  Gina Lai,et al.  Network resources, contact resources, and status attainment , 1998 .

[43]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  Social network activity and social well-being , 2010, CHI.

[44]  R. Burt.  Structural Holes and Good Ideas1 , 2004, American Journal of Sociology.

[45]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Network items and the general social survey , 1984 .