How Managers Protect Intellectual Property Rights in China Using De Facto Strategies

Foreign firms trying to protect their intellectual property rights (IPRs) in emerging economies are suffering real pressures because these economies usually offer little or no enforcement of IPR. Foreign firms therefore have to resort to approaches unlike those they use in developed countries. This paper explores what managers of foreign firms in China have already tried in their efforts to achieve effective IPR protection - specifically, they have crafted de facto strategies that can protect IPR without using China's legal system or engaging in lawsuits against imitators. These strategies work, and this paper explains how and why, thus offering a potential template for IPR protection in other economies with weak appropriability systems.

[1]  R. Reed,et al.  Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 1990 .

[2]  N. Harabi,et al.  Appropriability of technical innovations an empirical analysis , 1995 .

[3]  S. Katayama,et al.  Intellectual Property Rights Protection and Imitation---An empirical examination of Japanese FDI in China , 2005 .

[4]  R. Peerenboom.  To Steal a Book Is an Elegant Offense: Intellectual Property Law in Chinese Civilization (review) , 2011 .

[5]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[6]  Wilfried R. Vanhonacker,et al.  Operating a foreign-invested enterprise in China: challenges for managers and management researchers , 1999 .

[7]  Laura N. Gasaway,et al.  Protecting Intellectual Property. , 1993 .

[8]  K. Blind,et al.  Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany , 2006 .

[9]  Clarence K. Kwan,et al.  The seven disciplines for venturing in China , 2006 .

[10]  L. Melin,et al.  Micro Strategy and Strategizing: Towards an Activity‐Based View , 2003 .

[11]  Alexander Galetovic,et al.  How market smarts can protect property rights. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[12]  Peter W. Liesch,et al.  An unconventional approach to intellectual property protection: the case of an Australian firm transferring shipbuilding technologies to China , 2000 .

[13]  P. Feng.  Intellectual property in China , 1997 .

[14]  S. Katayama,et al.  Intellectual Property Rights Protection and Imitation: An Empirical Examination of Japanese F.D.I. in China , 2005 .

[15]  Deli Yang,et al.  Intellectual property law, technology flow and licensing opportunities in the People's Republic of China , 2000 .

[16]  Guido Möllering,et al.  Special Issue: Trust in an Organizational Context: Contextual Confidence and Active Trust Development in the Chinese Business Environment , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[17]  K. Idris.  WIPO intellectual property handbook: policy, law and use , 2001 .

[18]  R. Nelson,et al.  Economic Theories about the Benefits and Costs of Patents , 1998 .

[19]  Clifford J. Shultz,et al.  Protecting intellectual property: Strategies and recommendations to deter counterfeiting and brand piracy in global markets , 1996 .

[20]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States , 2002 .

[21]  Amy Jocelyn Glass,et al.  Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment , 2002 .

[22]  Anne S. Tsui,et al.  Guanxi and Business , 2001 .

[23]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[24]  Deli Yang,et al.  Intellectual Property Abuses: How should Multinationals Respond? , 2004 .

[25]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[26]  U. Zander.  Exploiting a technical edge : voluntary and involuntary dissemination of technology , 1991 .