Mapping the connectivity with structural equation modeling in an fMRI study of shape-from-motion task

In this fMRI study, we explore the connectivity among brain regions in a shape-from-motion task using the causal mapping analysis of structural equation modeling (SEM). An important distinction of our approach is that we have adapted SEM from its traditional role in confirmatory analysis to provide utility as an exploratory mapping technique. Our current approaches include (I) detecting brain regions that fit well in a hypothesized neural network model, and (II) identifying the best connectivity model at each brain region. We demonstrate that SEM effectively detects the dorsal and ventral visual pathways from the covariance structure in fMRI data, confirming previous neuroscience results. Further, our SEM mapping methodology found that the two pathways interact through specific cortical areas such as the superior lateral occipital cortex in the perception of shape from motion.

[1]  T. Albright,et al.  Contribution of area MT to perception of three-dimensional shape: a computational study , 1996, Vision Research.

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  H. Wallach,et al.  The kinetic depth effect. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  R. Leahy,et al.  Mapping human brain function with MEG and EEG: methods and validation , 2004, NeuroImage.

[5]  Mina Kim,et al.  Combining Functional and Diffusion Tensor MRI , 2005, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Network analysis of motor system connectivity in Parkinson's disease: Modulation of thalamocortical interactions after pallidotomy , 1994 .

[7]  B. Byrne Book Review: Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming , 1994 .

[8]  S. Zeki Functional specialisation in the visual cortex of the rhesus monkey , 1978, Nature.

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG , 2006, NeuroImage.

[10]  Deborah A. Hall,et al.  Connectivity analysis with structural equation modelling: an example of the effects of voxel selection , 2003, NeuroImage.

[11]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Human perception of structure from motion , 1991, Vision Research.

[12]  C. Büchel,et al.  Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modelling and fMRI. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  Michael Erb,et al.  Object-selective responses in the human motion area MT/MST , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  Josh H. McDermott,et al.  Functional imaging of human visual recognition. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[15]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Integration of Local Features into Global Shapes Monkey and Human fMRI Studies , 2003, Neuron.

[16]  C. Gross,et al.  Visuotopic organization and extent of V3 and V4 of the macaque , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  Bettina Sorger,et al.  Human Cortical Object Recognition from a Visual Motion Flowfield , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Human Cortical Regions Involved in Extracting Depth from Motion , 1999, Neuron.

[19]  R. M. Siegel,et al.  Perception of three-dimensional structure from motion in monkey and man , 1988, Nature.

[20]  S. Mulaik,et al.  EVALUATION OF GOODNESS-OF-FIT INDICES FOR STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS , 1989 .

[21]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[22]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  Lowell D. Jacobson,et al.  Reponse suppression by extending sine-wave gratings within the receptive fields of neurons in visual cortical area V3A of the macaque monkey , 1987, Vision Research.

[24]  D. C. Essen,et al.  The topographic organization of rhesus monkey prestriate cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  Scott Peltier,et al.  Connectivity exploration with structural equation modeling: an fMRI study of bimanual motor coordination , 2005, NeuroImage.

[26]  S. Edelman,et al.  Cue-Invariant Activation in Object-Related Areas of the Human Occipital Lobe , 1998, Neuron.

[27]  P. Rossini,et al.  Frontoparietal cortical networks revealed by Structural Equation modeling and high resolution EEG during a short term memory task , 2003, First International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, 2003. Conference Proceedings..

[28]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge , 1996, Nature.

[29]  Scott O. Murray,et al.  Processing Shape, Motion and Three-dimensional Shape-from-motion in the Human Cortex , 2003 .

[30]  A. Dale,et al.  From retinotopy to recognition: fMRI in human visual cortex , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  G. R. Mangun,et al.  Form-From-Motion: MEG Evidence for Time Course and Processing Sequence , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  A Berthoz,et al.  Visual perception of motion and 3-D structure from motion: an fMRI study. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  M. Mishkin,et al.  The effects of bilateral hippocampal damage on fMRI regional activations and interactions during memory retrieval. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[34]  F. Gonzalez-Lima,et al.  Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging , 1994 .

[35]  Z Kourtzi,et al.  Representation of Perceived Object Shape by the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 2001, Science.

[36]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[37]  G. Orban,et al.  Motion-responsive regions of the human brain , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modelling functional integration: a comparison of structural equation and dynamic causal models , 2004, NeuroImage.

[39]  A. Dale,et al.  Functional Analysis of V3A and Related Areas in Human Visual Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Cortical Regions Involved in Perceiving Object Shape , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[42]  S. Wright,et al.  The Relative Importance of Heredity and Environment in Determining the Piebald Pattern of Guinea-Pigs. , 1920, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  Gene E. Alexander,et al.  Network analysis of single-subject fMRI during a finger opposition task , 2006, NeuroImage.

[45]  James C. Anderson,et al.  Monte Carlo Evaluations of Goodness of Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models , 1992 .

[46]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Depth and shape from differential perspective in the presence of bending deformations. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[47]  R. Andersen,et al.  Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[48]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[49]  Laura Astolfi,et al.  Estimation of the cortical connectivity by high-resolution EEG and structural equation modeling: Simulations and application to finger tapping data , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[50]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  At what stage of neural processing do perspective depth cues make a difference? , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.