Statistics of Reconnection-driven Turbulence

Magnetic reconnection is a process that changes magnetic field topology in highly conducting fluids. Within the standard Sweet–Parker model, this process would be too slow to explain observations (e.g., solar flares). In reality, the process must be ubiquitous as astrophysical fluids are magnetized and motions of fluid elements necessarily entail crossing of magnetic frozen-in field lines and magnetic reconnection. In the presence of turbulence, the reconnection is independent of microscopic plasma properties and may be much faster than previously thought, as proposed in Lazarian & Vishniac and tested in Kowal et al. However, the considered turbulence in the Lazarian–Vishniac model was imposed externally. In this work, we consider reconnection-driven magnetized turbulence in realistic three-dimensional geometry initiated by stochastic noise. We demonstrate through numerical simulations that the stochastic reconnection is able to self-generate turbulence through interactions between the reconnection outflows. We analyze the statistical properties of velocity fluctuations using power spectra and anisotropy scaling in the local reference frame, which demonstrates that the reconnection produces Kolmogorov-like turbulence, compatible with the Goldreich & Sridhar model. Anisotropy statistics are, however, strongly affected by the dynamics of flows generated by the reconnection process. Once the broad turbulent region is formed, the typical anisotropy scaling is formed, especially for high resolution models, where the broader range of scales is available. The decay of reconnection outflows to turbulent-like fluctuations, characterized by different anisotropy scalings, strongly depends on the β plasma parameter. Moreover, the estimated reconnection rates are weakly dependent on the model resolution, suggesting that no external processes are required to make reconnection fast.

[1]  G. Kowal,et al.  Theory and Applications of Non-Relativistic and Relativistic Turbulent Reconnection , 2015, 1512.03066.

[2]  Ashis Bhattacharjee,et al.  TURBULENT MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMIC RECONNECTION MEDIATED BY THE PLASMOID INSTABILITY , 2015, 1512.01520.

[3]  A. Lazarian,et al.  TURBULENT RECONNECTION IN RELATIVISTIC PLASMAS AND EFFECTS OF COMPRESSIBILITY , 2015, 1509.07703.

[4]  A. Lazarian,et al.  THE TURBULENCE VELOCITY POWER SPECTRUM OF NEUTRAL HYDROGEN IN THE SMALL MAGELLANIC CLOUD , 2015, 1506.03448.

[5]  J. Oishi,et al.  SELF-GENERATED TURBULENCE IN MAGNETIC RECONNECTION , 2015, 1505.04653.

[6]  G. Eyink,et al.  Turbulent reconnection and its implications , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[7]  Kalin Kanov,et al.  Flux-freezing breakdown in high-conductivity magnetohydrodynamic turbulence , 2013, Nature.

[8]  A. Beresnyak THREE-DIMENSIONAL SPONTANEOUS MAGNETIC RECONNECTION , 2013, 1301.7424.

[9]  A. Lazarian,et al.  MAGNETIZATION OF CLOUD CORES AND ENVELOPES AND OTHER OBSERVATIONAL CONSEQUENCES OF RECONNECTION DIFFUSION , 2012, 1206.4698.

[10]  G. Kowal,et al.  Reconnection studies under different types of turbulence driving , 2012, 1203.2971.

[11]  G. Kowal,et al.  MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMIC SIMULATIONS OF RECONNECTION AND PARTICLE ACCELERATION: THREE-DIMENSIONAL EFFECTS , 2011, 1103.2984.

[12]  G. Eyink,et al.  FAST MAGNETIC RECONNECTION AND SPONTANEOUS STOCHASTICITY , 2011, 1103.1882.

[13]  G. Eyink Stochastic flux freezing and magnetic dynamo. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  J. Drake,et al.  A MAGNETIC RECONNECTION MECHANISM FOR THE GENERATION OF ANOMALOUS COSMIC RAYS , 2010 .

[15]  M. Juvela,et al.  THE POWER SPECTRUM OF TURBULENCE IN NGC 1333: OUTFLOWS OR LARGE-SCALE DRIVING? , 2009, 0910.1384.

[16]  A. Lazarian,et al.  DIFFUSION OF MAGNETIC FIELD AND REMOVAL OF MAGNETIC FLUX FROM CLOUDS VIA TURBULENT RECONNECTION , 2009, 0910.1117.

[17]  A. Lazarian,et al.  EXTENDING THE BIG POWER LAW IN THE SKY WITH TURBULENCE SPECTRA FROM WISCONSIN Hα MAPPER DATA , 2009, 0905.4413.

[18]  G. Kowal,et al.  NUMERICAL TESTS OF FAST RECONNECTION IN WEAKLY STOCHASTIC MAGNETIC FIELDS , 2009, 0903.2052.

[19]  G. Lapenta Self-feeding turbulent magnetic reconnection on macroscopic scales. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[20]  L. Hau,et al.  On MHD waves, fire-hose and mirror instabilities in anisotropic plasmas , 2007 .

[21]  A. Mignone A simple and accurate Riemann solver for isothermal MHD , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[22]  Steven J. Ruuth Global optimization of explicit strong-stability-preserving Runge-Kutta methods , 2005, Math. Comput..

[23]  J. F. Kirby,et al.  Which wavelet best reproduces the Fourier power spectrum? , 2005, Comput. Geosci..

[24]  C. Munz,et al.  Hyperbolic divergence cleaning for the MHD equations , 2002 .

[25]  A. Lazarian,et al.  Reconnection in the Interstellar Medium , 1999 .

[26]  A. Lazarian,et al.  Reconnection in a Weakly Stochastic Field , 1998, astro-ph/9811037.

[27]  John W. Armstrong,et al.  Electron Density Power Spectrum in the Local Interstellar Medium , 1995 .

[28]  S. Sridhar,et al.  Toward a theory of interstellar turbulence. 2. Strong Alfvenic turbulence , 1994 .

[29]  W. Matthaeus,et al.  Turbulent magnetic reconnection , 1986 .

[30]  A. Jacobson,et al.  Nonlocal dc electrical conductivity of a Lorentz plasma in a stochastic magnetic field , 1984 .

[31]  P. Sweet The topology of force-free magnetic fields , 1958 .

[32]  Eugene N. Parker,et al.  Sweet's mechanism for merging magnetic fields in conducting fluids , 1957 .

[33]  F. Low,et al.  The Boltzmann equation an d the one-fluid hydromagnetic equations in the absence of particle collisions , 1956, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[34]  H. Alfvén,et al.  Existence of Electromagnetic-Hydrodynamic Waves , 1942, Nature.

[35]  S. Roca-F brega,et al.  Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series , 2011 .

[36]  W. Matthaeus,et al.  Rapid magnetic reconnection caused by finite amplitude fluctuations , 1985 .