Landscape and anthropogenic features influence the use of auditory vigilance by mule deer

While visual forms of vigilance behavior and their relationship with predation risk have been broadly examined, animals also employ other vigilance modalities such as auditory vigilance by listening for the acoustic cues of predators. Similar to the tradeoffs associated with visual vigilance, auditory behavior potentially structures the energy budgets and behavior of animals. The cryptic nature of auditory vigilance makes it difficult to study, but on-animal acoustical monitoring has rapidly advanced our ability to investigate behaviors and conditions related to sound. We utilized this technique to investigate the ways external stimuli in an active natural gas development field affect periodic pausing by mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) within bouts of rumination-based mastication. To better understand the ecological properties that structure this behavior, we investigate spatial and temporal factors related to these pauses to determine if results are consistent with our hypothesis that pausing is used for auditory vigilance. We found that deer paused more when in forested cover and at night, where visual vigilance was likely to be less effective. Additionally, deer paused more in areas of moderate background sound levels, though responses to anthropogenic features were less clear. Our results suggest that pauses during rumination represent a form of auditory vigilance that is responsive to landscape variables. Further exploration of this behavior can facilitate a more holistic understanding of risk perception and the costs associated with vigilance behavior.

[1]  P. Lendrum,et al.  Migrating Mule Deer: Effects of Anthropogenically Altered Landscapes , 2013, PloS one.

[2]  Johan Lind,et al.  Determining the fitness consequences of antipredation behavior , 2005 .

[3]  Kevin R Crooks,et al.  The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  John D. Pettigrew,et al.  Frequency dependence of directional amplification at the cat's pinna , 1984, Hearing Research.

[5]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  ASSESSING EFFECTS OF PREDATION RISK ON FORAGING BEHAVIOR OF MULE DEER , 2001 .

[6]  S. Pellis,et al.  Altruism and recognition in the antipredator defence of deer: 2. Why mule deer help nonoffspring fawns , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  H. Fritz,et al.  Induced or routine vigilance while foraging , 2007 .

[8]  Martyn Plummer,et al.  JAGS Version 3.3.0 user manual , 2012 .

[9]  M. Hebblewhite,et al.  Human Activity Differentially Redistributes Large Mammals in the Canadian Rockies National Parks , 2011 .

[10]  A. Frid,et al.  Synthesis Human-caused Disturbance Stimuli as a Form of Predation Risk , 2002 .

[11]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[12]  L. Leaver,et al.  Grazing and vigilance by Soay sheep on Lundy island: Influence of group size, terrain and the distribution of vegetation , 2005, Behavioural Processes.

[13]  J. Berger Fear, human shields and the redistribution of prey and predators in protected areas , 2007, Biology Letters.

[14]  J. Kie,et al.  Habitat selection by mule deer during migration: effects of landscape structure and natural-gas development , 2012 .

[15]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus , 1990 .

[16]  O. C. Wallmo Mule and black-tailed deer of North America. , 1982 .

[17]  T. Riede,et al.  Fundamental frequency is key to response of female deer to juvenile distress calls , 2013, Behavioural Processes.

[18]  Abby Nance Landscape of Fear , 2014 .

[19]  Daniel J. Mennitt,et al.  Obtaining calibrated sound pressure levels from consumer digital audio recorders , 2012 .

[20]  A. Frid Vigilance by female Dall's sheep: interactions between predation risk factors , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .

[22]  L. Ebensperger,et al.  On the Relationship between Herbaceous Cover and Vigilance Activity of Degus (Octodon degus) , 2005 .

[23]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Vigilance, patch use and habitat selection: Foraging under predation risk , 1999 .

[24]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  The Ecology of Fear: Optimal Foraging, Game Theory, and Trophic Interactions , 1999 .

[25]  G. Wittemyer,et al.  Characterising the impacts of emerging energy development on wildlife, with an eye towards mitigation. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[26]  Kurt C. VerCauteren,et al.  A review of color vision in white-tailed deer , 2003 .

[27]  Marc Bekoff,et al.  Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior , 2004 .

[28]  J. Kie,et al.  Foraging behavior by mule deer : the influence of cattle grazing , 1991 .

[29]  W. Ripple,et al.  The Landscape of Fear: Ecological Implications of Being Afraid~!2009-09-09~!2009-11-16~!2010-02-02~! , 2010 .

[30]  RYAN M. NIELSON,et al.  Winter Habitat Selection of Mule Deer Before and During Development of a Natural Gas Field , 2006 .

[31]  Clinton D. Francis,et al.  Noise Pollution Changes Avian Communities and Species Interactions , 2009, Current Biology.

[32]  Alessandro Massolo,et al.  Human Activity Helps Prey Win the Predator-Prey Space Race , 2011, PloS one.

[33]  D. Blumstein,et al.  Quantifying human disturbance on antipredator behavior and flush initiation distance in yellow-bellied marmots , 2011 .

[34]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Life cycle period and activity of prey influence their susceptibility to predators , 2004 .

[35]  X. Pang,et al.  Effects of stapedius-muscle contractions on the masking of auditory-nerve responses. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  J. Randall,et al.  Variation in and Meaning of Alarm Calls in a Social Desert Rodent Rhombomys opimus , 2002 .

[37]  J. Hare,et al.  The song remains the same: Juvenile Richardson’s ground squirrels do not respond differentially to mother’s or colony member’s alarm calls , 2012 .

[38]  J. Laundré,et al.  Wolves, elk, and bison: reestablishing the "landscape of fear" in Yellowstone National Park, U.S.A. , 2001 .

[39]  G. Beauchamp How does food density influence vigilance in birds and mammals? , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[40]  D. Rubin,et al.  Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .

[41]  T. Stankowich Ungulate flight responses to human disturbance: a review and meta-analysis. , 2008 .

[42]  J. Lazarus,et al.  The problem of vigilance in animal life. , 1974, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[43]  J. Hare,et al.  Neighbourhood watch: multiple alarm callers communicate directional predator movement in Richardson’s ground squirrels, Spermophilus richardsonii , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[44]  M. Boyce,et al.  Foraging costs of vigilance in large mammalian herbivores , 2004 .

[45]  Gary C. White,et al.  Compensatory mortality in a Colorado mule deer population , 1992 .

[46]  R. Bartmann,et al.  Evaluation of Winter Food Choices by Tame Mule Deer , 1982 .

[47]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Vigilance while feeding and its relation to the risk of predation , 1987 .

[48]  S. Pellis,et al.  Altruism and recognition in the antipredator defence of deer: 1. Species and individual variation in fawn distress calls , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[49]  George Wittemyer,et al.  The use of on-animal acoustical recording devices for studying animal behavior , 2013, Ecology and evolution.