Abstract This paper presents three quasi on-line scheduling procedures for FMSs consisting of work stations, transport devices, and operators. In the scheduling, different types of decisions are taken to perform a particular operation, i.e. the selection of (a) a work station, (b) a transport device and (c) an operator. Further, (d) the scheduling sequence of the operations has to be determined. The three developed procedures differ in the way these four decision problems are solved hierarchically. Several dispatching rules (SPT, SPT.TOT, SPT/ TOT and EFTA) are available to solve the last mentioned decision problem. Limited buffer capacities in an FMS may cause deadlock in the procedures as well as in practice. The scheduling procedures involve a buffer handling method to avoid deadlock. A case study is presented to demonstrate the three procedures and to show some of its properties. Based on simulation tests, some conclusions are drawn about the performance of the scheduling procedures and the various di...
[1]
James J. Solberg,et al.
Capacity Planning with a Stochastic Workflow Model
,
1981
.
[2]
Kathryn E. Stecke,et al.
Loading and control policies for a flexible manufacturing system
,
1981
.
[3]
Kazuaki Iwata,et al.
Production Scheduling of Flexible Manufacturing Systems
,
1982
.
[4]
E. Adhami,et al.
Introducing a flexible manufacturing system
,
1984
.
[5]
Kazuaki Iwata,et al.
Solution of Large-Scale Scheduling Problems for Job-Shop Type Machining Systems with Alternative Machine Tools
,
1980
.
[6]
Kathryn E. Stecke,et al.
Design, planning, scheduling, and control problems of flexible manufacturing systems
,
1985
.