Decodable Texts for Beginning Reading Instruction: The Year 2000 Basals

This study focuses on the features of the first grade texts included in basal readers used for beginning reading instruction in Texas during the year 2000 adoption period. The authors investigated the general features of student texts with respect to the instructional design of the text, the accessibility of the text for beginning readers, and the engaging qualities of the texts. The features of these basal readers were then compared to the programs previously adopted in Texas (1987 and 1993 adoption periods). Using a variety of analyses, findings suggest that the mandate by the state of Texas to include more “decodable” texts did in fact, heavily influence the materials presented to beginning readers. In addition, there was an apparent lock of attention to other features that support beginning readers, specifically, predictability and the engaging qualities of the texts. The findings suggest that policy mandates have a direct influence on the content and nature of reading programs placed in the hands of teachers and students.

[1]  Elizabeth Franklin,et al.  New Perspectives on Comprehension. , 1987 .

[2]  R. Farr,et al.  The Evaluation and Selection of Basal Readers , 1987, The Elementary School Journal.

[3]  Nila Banton Smith,et al.  American Reading Instruction , 1934 .

[4]  Ina V. S. Mullis,et al.  Executive Summary of the NAEP 1992 Reading Report Card for the Nation and the States. Data from the National and Trial State Assessments. , 1993 .

[5]  Mary C. Austin,et al.  The torch lighters : tomorrow's teachers of reading , 1961 .

[6]  Jeanne Sternlicht Chall,et al.  Learning to Read: The Great Debate , 1967 .

[7]  Sarah J. McCarthey,et al.  The Literature-Based Basals in First-Grade Classrooms: Savior, Satan, or Same-Old, Same-Old?. , 1998 .

[8]  P. David Pearson.  Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[9]  D. Schallert,et al.  53rd Yearbook of the National Reading Conference. , 2004 .

[10]  Lea M. McGee.  Exploring the Literature-Based Reading Revolution (Focus on Research). , 1992 .

[11]  Elfrieda H. Hiebert,et al.  Early literacy instruction , 1998 .

[12]  J. Hoffman,et al.  Engaging the new basal readers , 1994 .

[13]  Catherine Curry,et al.  So What's New in the New Basals? a Focus on First Grade , 1994 .

[14]  L. S. Schulman.  Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching , 1986 .

[15]  Kenneth S. Goodman,et al.  Report card on basal readers , 1988 .

[16]  G. E. MacKinnon,et al.  Reading Research Advances in Theory and Practice , 1985 .

[17]  조석주,et al.  교과서 문장의 Readability , 1985 .

[18]  Rudolf Franz Flesch,et al.  Why Johnny can't read, and what you can do about it , 1955 .

[19]  R. Flesch.  Why Johnny Still Can't Read: A New Look at the Scandal of Our Schools , 1983 .

[20]  Elfrieda H. Hiebert,et al.  Literature Anthologies: The Task for First-Grade Readers. , 1999 .

[21]  Gerald G. Duffy,et al.  In Pursuit of an Illusion: The Flawed Search for a Perfect Method. , 1999 .

[22]  James V. Hoffman,et al.  Text Leveling and “Little Books” in First-Grade Reading , 2001 .

[23]  Patrick Shannon,et al.  Commercial Reading Materials, a Technological Ideology, and the Deskilling of Teachers , 1987, The Elementary School Journal.