Scene layout priming relies primarily on low-level features rather than scene layout.

The ability to perceive and remember the spatial layout of a scene is critical to understanding the visual world, both for navigation and for other complex tasks that depend upon the structure of the current environment. However, surprisingly little work has investigated how and when scene layout information is maintained in memory. One prominent line of work investigating this issue is a scene-priming paradigm (e.g., Sanocki & Epstein, 1997), in which different types of previews are presented to participants shortly before they judge which of two regions of a scene is closer in depth to the viewer. Experiments using this paradigm have been widely cited as evidence that scene layout information is stored across brief delays and have been used to investigate the structure of the representations underlying memory for scene layout. In the present experiments, we better characterize these scene-priming effects. We find that a large amount of visual detail rather than the presence of depth information is necessary for the priming effect; that participants show a preview benefit for a judgment completely unrelated to the scene itself; and that preview benefits are susceptible to masking and quickly decay. Together, these results suggest that "scene priming" effects do not isolate scene layout information in memory, and that they may arise from low-level visual information held in sensory memory. This broadens the range of interpretations of scene priming effects and suggests that other paradigms may need to be developed to selectively investigate how we represent scene layout information in memory.

[1]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Visual Sensory Memory , 2008 .

[2]  David E. Irwin Information integration across saccadic eye movements , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  F Germeys,et al.  Revisiting Scene Primes for Object Locations , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[5]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas , 2009, Nature.

[6]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  The relationship between online visual representation of a scene and long-term scene memory. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  J. Wallis,et al.  The Role of Prefrontal Cortex in Working Memory: A Mini Review , 2015, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[8]  W. Epstein,et al.  Priming Spatial Layout of Scenes , 1997 .

[9]  Christopher B. Currie,et al.  Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex pictures. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[11]  R. Desimone,et al.  Activity of neurons in anterior inferior temporal cortex during a short- term memory task , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  S. Magnussen Low-level memory processes in vision , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[13]  C. Curtis,et al.  Persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex during working memory , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Working memory is not fixed-capacity: More active storage capacity for real-world objects than for simple stimuli , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  B. Postle,et al.  The cognitive neuroscience of working memory. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[16]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  Hierarchical Encoding in Visual Working Memory , 2010, Psychological science.

[17]  Anna Shafer-Skelton,et al.  Global Ensemble Texture Representations are Critical to Rapid Scene Perception , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  D. Simons,et al.  Moving and looming stimuli capture attention , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  V. Lollo Temporal integration in visual memory. , 1980 .

[20]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  A new neural framework for visuospatial processing , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  Timothy F. Brady,et al.  A probabilistic model of visual working memory: Incorporating higher order regularities into working memory capacity estimates. , 2013, Psychological review.

[22]  J. Theeuwes Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  David E. Irwin,et al.  MEMORY FOR STRUCTURAL INFORMATION ACROSS EYE MOVEMENTS , 1995 .

[24]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Modeling the Shape of the Scene: A Holistic Representation of the Spatial Envelope , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[25]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. , 2006, Psychological review.

[27]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[28]  John T Serences,et al.  Neural mechanisms of information storage in visual short-term memory , 2016, Vision Research.

[29]  A. Oliva,et al.  From Blobs to Boundary Edges: Evidence for Time- and Spatial-Scale-Dependent Scene Recognition , 1994 .

[30]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  From cognitive to neural models of working memory , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  Thomas Sanocki Facilitatory priming of scene layout depends on experience with the scene , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  John M Henderson,et al.  The time course of initial scene processing for eye movement guidance in natural scene search. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[33]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Evidence against visual integration across saccadic eye movements , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  Daniel D. Dilks,et al.  The Occipital Place Area Is Causally and Selectively Involved in Scene Perception , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Some temporal characteristics of visual pattern perception. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  Michelle R. Greene,et al.  Visual search in scenes involves selective and nonselective pathways , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  S. Luck,et al.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory , 2008, Nature.

[38]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Stimulus-Specific Delay Activity in Human Primary Visual Cortex , 2022 .

[39]  W. A. Phillips On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory , 1974 .

[40]  Adam J. Berinsky,et al.  Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk , 2012, Political Analysis.

[41]  A. Hollingworth Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: the roles of short- and long-term visual memory. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Building the gist of a scene: the role of global image features in recognition. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[43]  Russell A. Epstein,et al.  The Occipital Place Area Is Causally Involved in Representing Environmental Boundaries during Navigation , 2016, Current Biology.

[44]  Soojin Park,et al.  Disentangling Scene Content from Spatial Boundary: Complementary Roles for the Parahippocampal Place Area and Lateral Occipital Complex in Representing Real-World Scenes , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  Jianxiong Xiao,et al.  SUN RGB-D: A RGB-D scene understanding benchmark suite , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[46]  A. Noë,et al.  A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[47]  Russell A. Epstein The cortical basis of visual scene processing , 2005 .

[48]  John M. Henderson,et al.  Transsaccadic Memory and Integration During Real-World Object Perception , 1997 .

[49]  Michelle R. Greene,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article The Briefest of Glances The Time Course of Natural Scene Understanding , 2022 .

[50]  T. Pasternak,et al.  Working memory in primate sensory systems , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[51]  J. Henderson,et al.  Initial scene representations facilitate eye movement guidance in visual search. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[53]  C. Gottesman,et al.  Mental layout extrapolations prime spatial processing of scenes. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  E. Vogel,et al.  Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[55]  Thomas Sanocki,et al.  Representations of scene layout can consist of independent, functional pieces , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[56]  J. Jonides,et al.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[57]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[58]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[59]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  The role of visual short-term memory in empty cell localization , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[60]  E. Maguire The retrosplenial contribution to human navigation: a review of lesion and neuroimaging findings. , 2001, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[61]  Li Fei-Fei,et al.  Simple line drawings suffice for functional MRI decoding of natural scene categories , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Extrapolating spatial layout in scene representations , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[63]  Abel G. Oliva,et al.  Gist of a scene , 2005 .

[64]  W. Ma,et al.  Changing concepts of working memory , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[65]  Thomas Sanocki,et al.  Representation and perception of scenic layout , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[66]  Dirk B Walther,et al.  Nonaccidental Properties Underlie Human Categorization of Complex Natural Scenes , 2014, Psychological science.

[67]  Kartik K. Sreenivasan,et al.  Revisiting the role of persistent neural activity during working memory , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[68]  D. Simons In Sight, Out of Mind: When Object Representations Fail , 1996 .

[69]  John Duncan,et al.  A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex , 1993, Nature.