论文信息 - Motor Response Matters: Optimizing Lead Placement Improves Sacral Neuromodulation Outcomes - 字舞流文

Motor Response Matters: Optimizing Lead Placement Improves Sacral Neuromodulation Outcomes

H. Goldman | B. Gill | S. Vasavada | M. Clifton | J. Pizarro-Berdichevsky | Anna Faris | Henry Okafor

[1] D. Liberman,et al. Sacral Neuromodulation in Urological Practice. , 2017, Urology.

[2] C. Comiter,et al. Three-year Follow-up Results of a Prospective, Multicenter Study in Overactive Bladder Subjects Treated With Sacral Neuromodulation. , 2016, Urology.

[3] C. Comiter,et al. Results of a prospective, multicenter study evaluating quality of life, safety, and efficacy of sacral neuromodulation at twelve months in subjects with symptoms of overactive bladder , 2016, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[4] A. Lenis,et al. Patterns of hardware related electrode failures in sacral nerve stimulation devices. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[5] Claire C. Yang,et al. Reoperation After Sacral Neuromodulation Therapy: A Single-Institution Experience , 2013, Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery.

[6] K. Peters,et al. Is sensory testing during lead placement crucial for achieving positive outcomes after sacral neuromodulation? , 2011, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[7] Elizabeth R. Williams,et al. Procedural techniques in sacral nerve modulation , 2010, International Urogynecology Journal.

[8] Jennifer M Wu,et al. Efficacy and adverse events of sacral nerve stimulation for overactive bladder: A systematic review , 2010, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[9] F. Klein,et al. Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of refractory urinary retention: long-term efficacy and durability. , 2007, Urology.