Dynamic evaluation of the influence of drafting units in China’s air quality standards network

Abstract The setting of air quality standards is highly significant in controlling widespread pollutants and mitigating environmental risks. The selection of influential drafting units is a major step for the improvement of the systematicness, harmony, and compatibility of standard systems, which further leads to high air quality. To this end, this paper presents a novel social network-based methodology to assess the influence of drafting units based on a dynamic two-layer standard network model with the publicized data of the national air quality standards of China. Firstly, network theory metrics are aggregated with the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to evaluate their importance dynamically; Secondly, three measurements of participation degree, cooperation degree, and contribution degree are deliberately designed to assess the influence of drafting units. The results show that most of the key standards vary over time driven by policy reform, while the volatility of critical drafting units is relatively stable. It is also interesting to find that most of the influential drafting units are research institutes rather than enterprises. In view of the results, we assert that government agencies should strategically support influential drafting units and encourage them to make great efforts in drafting important standards.

[1]  Thomas W. Pike.  Collaboration networks and scientific impact among behavioral ecologists , 2010 .

[2]  Nathan L. Vanderford,et al.  Assessing Research Collaboration through Co-authorship Network Analysis. , 2018, The journal of research administration.

[3]  F. Harary,et al.  Eccentricity and centrality in networks , 1995 .

[4]  Sujin Choi,et al.  The triple helix and international collaboration in science , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  E. Garfield.  Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. 1955. , 1955, International journal of epidemiology.

[6]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks in Scientometrics , 2008, Scientometrics.

[7]  Hongtao Yi,et al.  Network Structure and Governance Performance: What Makes a Difference? , 2018 .

[8]  Kadia Georges Aka.  Actor-network theory to understand, track and succeed in a sustainable innovation development process , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[9]  Franco Malerba,et al.  The structure and dynamics of networks of scientific collaborations in Northern Africa , 2015, Scientometrics.

[10]  Hong-Li Zhou,et al.  Dynamic robustness of knowledge collaboration network of open source product development community , 2018 .

[11]  Yang Li,et al.  Important institutions of interinstitutional scientific collaboration networks in materials science , 2018, Scientometrics.

[12]  Shiu-Wan Hung,et al.  Examining the small world phenomenon in the patent citation network: a case study of the radio frequency identification (RFID) network , 2009, Scientometrics.

[13]  Po-Hsuan Tseng.  Cluster-based networks for cooperative localisation , 2017 .

[14]  M. Gittelman,et al.  Applicant and Examiner Citations in US Patents: An Overview and Analysis , 2008 .

[15]  Zhaohui Chong,et al.  Environmental Regulation and Industrial Structure Change in China: Integrating Spatial and Social Network Analysis , 2017 .

[16]  Yong Deng,et al.  A modified weighted TOPSIS to identify influential nodes in complex networks , 2016 .

[17]  Alina Kadyrova,et al.  How the analysis of transitionary references in knowledge networks and their centrality characteristics helps in understanding the genesis of growing technology areas , 2017, Scientometrics.

[18]  Zhifeng Yang,et al.  Wetland system network analysis for environmental flow allocations in the Baiyangdian Basin, China , 2011 .

[19]  Riyaz Sikora,et al.  Assessing the relative influence of journals in a citation network , 2005, CACM.

[20]  Hongtao Yi,et al.  Policy Networks in Complex Governance Subsystems: Observing and Comparing Hyperlink, Media, and Partnership Networks , 2016 .

[21]  Kash Barker,et al.  A multi-criteria decision analysis approach for importance identification and ranking of network components , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[22]  Jiang Li,et al.  Patterns and evolution of coauthorship in China’s humanities and social sciences , 2015, Scientometrics.

[23]  Yong Deng,et al.  Identifying influential nodes in complex networks based on AHP , 2017 .

[24]  D. Price.  Is Technology Historically Independent of Science? A Study in Statistical Historiography , 1965 .

[25]  Patrick Doreian,et al.  A measure of standing of journals in stratified networks , 1985, Scientometrics.

[26]  S. Mahadevan,et al.  A new method of identifying influential nodes in complex networks based on TOPSIS , 2014 .

[27]  Ichiro Sakata,et al.  Link prediction in citation networks , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[28]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[29]  Schumpeter Tamada,et al.  Analysis of cooperative research and development networks on Japanese patents , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[30]  M. Marchetti,et al.  Network analysis to support environmental resources management. A case study in the Cerrado, Brazil , 2016 .

[31]  Peng Liu,et al.  Structure and evolution of co-authorship network in an interdisciplinary research field , 2014, Scientometrics.

[32]  Maurizio Bevilacqua,et al.  An approach based on association rules and social network analysis for managing environmental risk: A case study from a process industry , 2019 .

[33]  Liguo Fei,et al.  A new method to identify influential nodes based on relative entropy , 2017 .

[34]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[35]  Hsin-Yu Shih,et al.  International diffusion of embodied and disembodied technology: A network analysis approach , 2009 .

[36]  K. Blind,et al.  Motives to patent: Empirical evidence from Germany , 2006 .

[37]  Ove Granstrand,et al.  Patenting motives, technology strategies, and open innovation , 2017 .

[38]  Ed C. M. Noyons,et al.  Combining mapping and citation network analysis for a better understanding of the scientific development: The case of the absorptive capacity field , 2008, J. Informetrics.

[39]  Hongtao Yi,et al.  Performance Ranking and Environmental Governance: An Empirical Study of the Mandatory Target System , 2018 .

[40]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  Author productivity and geodesic distance in bibliographic co-authorship networks, and visibility on the Web , 2004, Scientometrics.

[41]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[42]  Kunlun Wang,et al.  The effect of environmental regulation on air quality: A study of new ambient air quality standards in China , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[43]  M. Kegler,et al.  Using network analysis to assess the evolution of organizational collaboration in response to a major environmental health threat. , 2010, Health education research.

[44]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[45]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Dynamic evaluation of low-carbon competitiveness(LCC) based on improved Technique for Order Preference by similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method: A case study of Chinese steelworks , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[46]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations , 2001, cond-mat/0104162.

[47]  Michael Scott,et al.  Re-theorizing social network analysis and environmental governance , 2015 .

[48]  Bala Iyer,et al.  Knowledge Sharing and Value Flow in the Software Industry: Searching the Patent Citation Network , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[49]  J. Moody.  The Structure of a Social Science Collaboration Network: Disciplinary Cohesion from 1963 to 1999 , 2004 .

[50]  Duk Hee Lee,et al.  Structural properties and inter-organizational knowledge flows of patent citation network: The case of organic solar cells , 2016 .

[51]  Daniel W. Franks,et al.  Using social network analysis of mixed-species groups in African savannah herbivores to assess how community structure responds to environmental change , 2019, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[52]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Betweenness and diversity in journal citation networks as measures of interdisciplinarity—A tribute to Eugene Garfield , 2017, Scientometrics.

[53]  Marco Scotti,et al.  Network Analysis as a tool for assessing environmental sustainability: applying the ecosystem perspective to a Danish Water Management System. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.