Epidemiological Trends in the Timing of In-Hospital Death in Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock in the United States

Background: There are limited data on the epidemiology and timing of in-hospital death (IHD) in patients with acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS). Methods: Adult admissions with AMI-CS with IHDs were identified using the National Inpatient Sample (2000–2016) and were classified as early (≤2 days), mid-term (3–7 days), and late (>7 days). Inter-hospital transfers and those with do-not-resuscitate statuses were excluded. The outcomes of interest included the epidemiology, temporal trends and predictors for IHD timing. Results: IHD was noted in 113,349 AMI-CS admissions (median time to IHD 3 (interquartile range 1–7) days), with early, mid-term and late IHD in 44%, 32% and 24%, respectively. Compared to the mid-term and late groups, the early IHD group had higher rates of ST-segment-elevation AMI-CS (74%, 63%, 60%) and cardiac arrest (37%, 33%, 29%), but lower rates of acute organ failure (68%, 79%, 89%), use of coronary angiography (45%, 56%, 67%), percutaneous coronary intervention (33%, 36%, 42%), and mechanical circulatory support (31%, 39%, 50%) (all p < 0.001). There was a temporal increase in the early (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for 2016 vs. 2000 2.50 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.22–2.78)) and a decrease in mid-term (aOR 0.75 (95% CI 0.71–0.79)) and late (aOR 0.34 (95% CI 0.31–0.37)) IHD. ST-segment-elevation AMI-CS and cardiac arrest were associated with the increased risk of early IHD, whereas advanced comorbidity and acute organ failure were associated with late IHD. Conclusions: Early IHD after AMI-CS has increased between 2000 and 2016. The populations with early vs. late IHD were systematically different.

[1]  S. Vallabhajosyula,et al.  Cardiac Arrest Definition Using Administrative Codes and Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction. , 2020, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[2]  Roger D. White,et al.  Epidemiology of in-hospital cardiac arrest complicating non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction receiving early coronary angiography. , 2020, American heart journal.

[3]  B. Gersh,et al.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use in Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States, 2000 to 2014. , 2019, Circulation. Heart failure.

[4]  Roger D. White,et al.  Early vs. delayed in-hospital cardiac arrest complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2019, Resuscitation.

[5]  B. Gersh,et al.  Mechanical Circulatory Support-Assisted Early Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock: 10-Year National Temporal Trends, Predictors and Outcomes. , 2019, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[6]  A. Law,et al.  National Trends in Timing of Death Among Patients With Septic Shock, 1994-2014. , 2019, Critical care medicine.

[7]  B. Gersh,et al.  Temporal trends, predictors, and outcomes of acute kidney injury and hemodialysis use in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock , 2019, PloS one.

[8]  B. Gersh,et al.  Acute respiratory failure and mechanical ventilation in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction in the USA, 2000–2014 , 2019, Annals of Intensive Care.

[9]  D. Holmes,et al.  Hospital-Level Disparities in the Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock. , 2019, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  Dennis H. Murphree,et al.  Utilization of Palliative Care for Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: A 15‐Year National Perspective on Trends, Disparities, Predictors, and Outcomes , 2019, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[11]  G. Barsness,et al.  Multidisciplinary teams for cardiogenic shock , 2019, Aging.

[12]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Temporal trends and outcomes of prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation and tracheostomy use in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock in the United States. , 2019, International journal of cardiology.

[13]  B. Gersh,et al.  Acute Noncardiac Organ Failure in Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  C. O'connor,et al.  Standardized Team-Based Care for Cardiogenic Shock. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  D. Morrow,et al.  Epidemiology of Shock in Contemporary Cardiac Intensive Care Units: Data From the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Registry , 2019, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[16]  B. Gersh,et al.  Trends, Predictors, and Outcomes of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Postcardiac Surgery Cardiogenic Shock. , 2019, The American journal of cardiology.

[17]  K. Kashani,et al.  Tako‐Tsubo Cardiomyopathy in Severe Sepsis: Nationwide Trends, Predictors, and Outcomes , 2018, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[18]  B. Gersh,et al.  Concomitant Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Use in Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2018, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[19]  H. Krumholz,et al.  With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility: Big Data Research From the National Inpatient Sample. , 2017, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[20]  H. Thiele,et al.  Risk Stratification for Patients in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.