Situation Awareness in Dynamic Decision Making: Effects of Practice and Working Memory

The goal of this research is (a) to investigate the effects of task practice on situation awareness (SA); (b) to investigate how cognitive ability – in particular, working memory – moderates this practice effect on SA; and (c) to investigate effects of the SA measurement procedure (covering or uncovering the display while queries are answered). Task practice and working memory influence SA. However, the dynamics of the relationship between working memory and SA over time are not well understood, particularly with regard to using different SA measures. This research reports an experiment in which different SA measurement methods were used while participants played a computer simulation over several days. SA was measured using two query methods: a covered method in which questions were asked while the display was blanked out, and an uncovered method in which questions were asked while the display was shown. A working memory measure was collected from participants. Results indicate that the relationship between working memory and SA diminishes with task practice and differs between a covered and uncovered method. We also found that SA improvement with practice depends on the way in which SA is measured. We discuss the implications of these findings for understanding SA development, SA measurement, and the relationship of working memory in this process. The results from this study have clear implications for systems design, for the design of learning aids, and for SA measurement.

[1]  Andrew R. Dattel,et al.  Does Situation Awareness Add to the Validity of Cognitive Tests? , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[2]  M R Endsley,et al.  Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation. , 1996, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[3]  A. Miyake,et al.  The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: an individual differences approach. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[4]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Skilled memory and expertise: Mechanisms of exceptional performance. , 1988 .

[5]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  Pilot Interaction With Cockpit Automation: Operational Experiences With the Flight Management System , 1992 .

[6]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Experimental Analysis and Measurement of Situation Awareness , 1995 .

[7]  P. Ackerman Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. , 1988 .

[8]  Kenneth Kotovsky,et al.  Complex Information Processing: The Impact of Herbert A. Simon , 1989 .

[9]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  The use of microworlds to study dynamic decision making , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Measurement of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[11]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Theoretical Underpinnings of Situation Awareness, A Critical Review , 2000 .

[12]  A. Baddeley Working Memory: The Interface between Memory and Cognition , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Design and Evaluation for Situation Awareness Enhancement , 1988 .

[14]  Z. Dienes,et al.  The role of specific instances in controlling a dynamic system , 1995 .

[15]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[16]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  The Relationships between Cognitive Ability and Dynamic Decision Making. , 2005 .

[17]  Cleotilde Gonzalez Verbal Protocols in Real-Time Dynamic Decision-Making , 2003 .

[18]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  Task Workload and Cognitive Abilities in Dynamic Decision Making , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[19]  L. Gugerty Situation Awareness During Driving: Explicit and Implicit Knowledge in Dynamic Spatial Memory , 1997 .

[20]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Direct Measurement of Situation Awareness: Validity and Use of SAGAT , 2000 .

[21]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  Instance-based learning in dynamic decision making , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[22]  Danko Nikolić,et al.  Expertise and chess: A pilot study comparing situation awareness methodologies , 1995 .

[23]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[24]  Dianne C. Berry,et al.  The combination of explicit and implicit learning processes in task control , 1987 .

[25]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[26]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  Instance-based learning in dynamic decision making , 2003 .

[27]  Stephanie M. Doane,et al.  Memory Processes of Flight Situation Awareness: Interactive Roles of Working Memory Capacity, Long-Term Working Memory, and Expertise , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[28]  P. Ackerman Predicting individual differences in complex skill acquisition: dynamics of ability determinants. , 1992, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Designing for Situation Awareness in Complex System , 2001 .

[30]  Daniel J. Garland,et al.  Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement , 2009 .

[31]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  Learning to Make Decisions in Dynamic Environments: Effects of Time Constraints and Cognitive Abilities , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[32]  Danko Nikolić,et al.  SITUATION AWARENESS AS A PREDICTOR OF PERFORMANCE IN EN ROUTE AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS , 1998 .