Spatial microsimulation as a method for estimating different poverty rates in Australia

This paper uses spatial microsimulation to calculate small area poverty severity and headcount poverty in Australia using the Foster-Greer-Thorbeck method. The estimates of poverty severity across Australia, and for certain subgroups of the population, are then compared with headcount poverty rates. Areas of difference are highlighted, and the reasons for some of these differences are investigated further. Because the spatial microsimulation gives unit record data on incomes in each small area, we can compare the microsimulated income distributions for the small areas to see what drives the difference between headcount poverty and poverty severity. We find that the headcount poverty rate is in the same quintile as poverty severity for 63% of people in Australia. The headcount poverty rate tends to be lower than poverty severity in areas where there is extreme poverty, and this is confirmed by looking at the microsimulated income distribution of areas where the differences were greater. This may be because poverty severity is giving greater weight to the extreme poor compared with headcount poverty. There were very few areas where the headcount poverty was higher than poverty severity. Looking at older single people, the picture was very different. Only 36% of aged single people were in the same quintile. In many areas, the headcount poverty was much higher than poverty severity. Areas where the headcount poverty rate was higher than the poverty severity tended to be areas where there were a number of people very close to the poverty line, which is common for aged single people on a pension. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  A. Sen,et al.  Poverty: An Ordinal Approach to Measurement , 1976 .

[2]  N. Kakwani On a Class of Poverty Measures , 1980 .

[3]  Ann Harding,et al.  Worlds Apart: postcodes with the highest and lowest poverty rates in today's Australia , 2002 .

[4]  Robert Tanton,et al.  Poverty at the Local Level: National and Small Area Poverty Estimates by Family Type for Australia in 2006 , 2011 .

[5]  P. Saunders,et al.  Monitoring Trends in Poverty and Income Distribution: Data, Methodology and Measurement , 2006 .

[6]  A. Harding,et al.  Housing Stress Today: Estimates for Statistical Local Areas in 2005 , 2007 .

[7]  G. Marks Income Poverty, Subjective Poverty and Financial Stress , 2007 .

[8]  J. Lanjouw,et al.  Micro-Level Estimation of Poverty and Inequality , 2003 .

[9]  B. Hunter Three nations, not one: Indigenous and other Australian poverty , 2004 .

[10]  D. Pfeffermann Small Area Estimation‐New Developments and Directions , 2002 .

[11]  P. Siminski,et al.  Assessing the quality and inter-temporal comparability of ABS household income distribution survey data , 2003 .

[12]  B. Anderson Creating small area income deprivation estimates for northern Ireland: spatial microsimulation modelling , 2009 .

[13]  A. Harding,et al.  Model 22 SpatialMSM — NATSEM’s Small Area Household Model for Australia , 2007 .

[14]  E. Thorbecke,et al.  A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures , 1984 .

[15]  G. Beer,et al.  Creating a Basefile for Stinmod , 2002 .

[16]  Timothy M. Smeeding,et al.  EQUIVALENCE SCALES, WELL‐BEING, INEQUALITY, AND POVERTY: SENSITIVITY ESTIMATES ACROSS TEN COUNTRIES USING THE LUXEMBOURG INCOME STUDY (LIS) DATABASE , 1988 .

[17]  Malay Ghosh,et al.  Small Area Estimation: An Appraisal , 1994 .

[18]  B. Bradbury Are the Low Income Self-employed Poor? , 1996 .

[19]  Graham Clarke,et al.  A Spatial Microsimulation Model for Social Policy Evaluation , 2003 .

[20]  Graham Clarke,et al.  Building a Dynamic Spatial Microsimulation Model for Ireland , 2005 .

[21]  D. Ballas,et al.  Using SimBritain to Model the Geographical Impact of National Government Policies , 2007 .

[22]  Robert Tanton,et al.  Comparing Two Methods of Reweighting a Survey File to Small Area Data - Generalised Regression and Combinatorial Optimisation , 2007 .

[23]  T. Fujii Commune-Level Estimation of Poverty Measures and its Application in Cambodia , 2004 .

[24]  P. Saunders Poverty in Australia Sensitivity Analysis and Recent Trends , 2008 .

[25]  J. Yates,et al.  Conceptualising and measuring the housing affordability problem , 2005 .

[26]  Paul Williamson,et al.  An evaluation of the combinatorial optimisation approach to the creation of synthetic microdata , 2000 .

[27]  Graham Clarke,et al.  A spatial micro-simulation analysis of methane emissions from Irish agriculture , 2009 .

[28]  Y. Vidyattama,et al.  Old, Single and Poor: Using Microsimulation and Microdata to Analyse Poverty and the Impact of Policy Change among Older Australians , 2009 .

[29]  Y. Vidyattama,et al.  Improving work incentives for mothers: the national and geographic impact of liberalising the Family Tax Benefit income test , 2008 .

[30]  M. Brewer,et al.  Micro-simulating child poverty in 2010 and 2020 , 2009 .

[31]  R. Scutella,et al.  Understanding and Improving Data Quality Relating to Low-Income Households , 2005 .

[32]  Y. Vidyattama,et al.  Improving Work Incentives and Incomes for Parents: The National and Geographic Impact of Liberalising the Family Tax Benefit Income Test , 2009 .