Multitarget Error Estimation and Adaptivity in Aerodynamic Flow Simulations

Important quantities in aerodynamic flow simulations are the aerodynamic force coefficients including the pressure induced and the viscous stress induced drag, lift, and moment coefficients. In addition to the exact approximation of these quantities it is of increasing importance, in particular in the field of uncertainty quantification, to estimate the error in the computed quantities. In recent years a posteriori error estimation and goal-oriented refinement approaches have been developed for the accurate and efficient computation of single target quantities. The current approaches are based on computing an adjoint solution related to each of the specific target quantities under consideration. In this paper we extend this approach to the accurate and efficient computation of multiple target quantities. Instead of computing multiple adjoint solutions, one for each target functional, the new approach is based on the solution to one discrete adjoint problem and one discrete error problem. This way only two auxiliary problems are required irrespective of the number of target functionals. The practical performance of this approach is demonstrated for a laminar compressible flow. In particular, the proposed approach is compared to the standard approach of error estimation and goal-oriented refinement as well as to residual-based refinement. The performance of the algorithms is measured in terms of computing resources required for meeting industrial as well as academic accuracy requirements on the computed force coefficients.

[1]  Ralf Hartmann Adaptive Finite Element Methods for the Compressible Euler Equations , 2002 .

[2]  Ralf Hartmann,et al.  Adjoint Consistency Analysis of Discontinuous Galerkin Discretizations , 2007, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[3]  D. Venditti,et al.  Anisotropic grid adaptation for functional outputs: application to two-dimensional viscous flows , 2003 .

[4]  Rolf Rannacher,et al.  A Feed-Back Approach to Error Control in Finite Element Methods: Basic Analysis and Examples , 1996 .

[5]  R. Rannacher,et al.  A posteriori error analysis for stabilised finite element approximations of transport problems , 2000 .

[6]  R. Hartmann,et al.  Adaptive discontinuous Galerkin finite element methods for the compressible Euler equations , 2002 .

[7]  Rolf Rannacher,et al.  An optimal control approach to a posteriori error estimation in finite element methods , 2001, Acta Numerica.

[8]  M. Giles,et al.  Adjoint methods for PDEs: a posteriori error analysis and postprocessing by duality , 2002, Acta Numerica.

[9]  Ralf Hartmann,et al.  Goal-Oriented A Posteriori Error Estimation for Multiple Target Functionals , 2003 .

[10]  Mats G. Larson,et al.  A posteriori eror estimation for higher order Godunov finite volume methods on unstructured meshes , 2002 .

[11]  Endre Süli,et al.  hp-Adaptive Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Element Methods for First-Order Hyperbolic Problems , 2001, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[12]  W. Bangerth,et al.  deal.II—A general-purpose object-oriented finite element library , 2007, TOMS.

[13]  Endre Süli,et al.  The importance of adjoint consistency in the approximation of linear functionals using the discontinuous Galerkin finite element method , 2004 .

[14]  Ralf Hartmann,et al.  Symmetric Interior Penalty DG Methods for the Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations II: Goal--Oriented A Posteriori Error Estimation , 2005 .

[15]  R. Hartmann,et al.  Symmetric Interior Penalty DG Methods for the CompressibleNavier-Stokes Equations I: Method Formulation , 2005 .

[16]  Endre Süli,et al.  Stabilised hp-Finite Element Approximation of Partial Differential Equations with Nonnegative Characteristic Form , 2001, Computing.

[17]  James Lu,et al.  An a posteriori Error Control Framework for Adaptive Precision Optimization using Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Element Method , 2005 .

[18]  Ralf Hartmann,et al.  An optimal order interior penalty discontinuous Galerkin discretization of the compressible Navier-Stokes equations , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[19]  Ralf Hartmann,et al.  Adaptive discontinuous Galerkin methods with shock‐capturing for the compressible Navier–Stokes equations , 2006 .

[20]  Ralf Hartmann,et al.  Adaptive Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Element Methods for Nonlinear Hyperbolic Conservation Laws , 2002, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[21]  Douglas N. Arnold,et al.  Unified Analysis of Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Elliptic Problems , 2001, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..