Tobin's q, Unionization, and the Concentration-Profits Relationship

This article uses Tobin's q, the ratio of the market value of a firm to the replacement value of its physical assets, to measure monopoly power and to examine the relationship between market structure and profitability. Tobin's q is a better measure of monopoly profits than indices of single-period profitability because it measures long-run monopoly power. In addition, it is subject to less measurement error and it contains an adjustment for risk. The relationship between q and long-run monopoly power is established. Provided that all inputs are supplied competitively, q should be highly sensitive to even small amounts of monopoly power. Since the level of q is generally not high in the American economy, the result suggests either that monopoly power is absent or that unions manage to capture monopoly rents. Empirical tests of the relationship between Tobin's q and measures of market structure and unionization provide evidence that unions do capture most monopoly rents.

[1]  M. B. Zimmerman,et al.  Unionization and Profitability: Evidence from the Capital Market , 1984, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  R. Freeman Unionism, Price-Cost Margins, and the Return to Capital , 1983 .

[3]  G. William Schwert,et al.  Size and stock returns, and other empirical regularities , 1983 .

[4]  John J. McGowan,et al.  On the Misuse of Accounting Rates of Return to Infer Monopoly Profits , 1983 .

[5]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  Economies of Scale and Barriers to Entry , 1981, Journal of Political Economy.

[6]  L. Summers,et al.  Tax Reform and Corporate Investment: A Microeconometric Simulation Study , 1981 .

[7]  L. Summers Taxation and Corporate Investment: A q-Theory Approach , 1981 .

[8]  E. Lindenberg,et al.  Tobin's q Ratio and Industrial Organization , 1981 .

[9]  J. Shoven,et al.  The Financial Valuation of the Return to Capital , 1980 .

[10]  John T. Scott,et al.  Competition in an Open Economy: A Model Applied to Canada , 1980 .

[11]  A. Auerbach Share Valuation and Corporate Equity Policy , 1979 .

[12]  James L. Medoff,et al.  New Estimates of Private Sector Unionism in the United States , 1979 .

[13]  Stephen Martin Advertising, Concentration, and Profitability: The Simultaneity Problem , 1979 .

[14]  Dennis C. Mueller,et al.  Industrial Research and Development, Intangible Capital Stocks, and Firm Profit Rates , 1978 .

[15]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  Using the H-Index of Concentration with Published Data , 1977 .

[16]  Stavros B. Thomadakis A Value-Based Test of Profitability and Market Structure , 1977 .

[17]  L. Weiss,et al.  Advertising, Concentration, and Price-Cost Margins , 1976, Journal of Political Economy.

[18]  Jeremy I. Bulow,et al.  Inflation Accounting and Nonfinancial Corporate Profits: Physical Assets , 1975 .

[19]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Consumer Behavior, Retailer Power and Market Performance in Consumer Goods Industries , 1974 .

[20]  William S. Comanor,et al.  Advertising and Market Power , 1974 .

[21]  H. Demsetz Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy , 1973, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[22]  L. Weiss The Geographic Size of Markets in Manufacturing , 1972 .

[23]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  The Economics Of Advertising , 1972 .

[24]  G. Stigler A Theory of Oligopoly , 1964, Journal of Political Economy.

[25]  Joe S. Bain,et al.  Relation of Profit Rate to Industry Concentration: American Manufacturing, 1936–1940 , 1951 .