Broker's Communication for Service Oriented Network Architecture

The diversity, heterogeneity and innovation in network application domain prompted a new era of Internet. Many technologies such as ATM, Frame Relay, X.25, etc., were developed to provide alternative for communication in networked systems, but could not succeed to get evolved as one of the alternate / replacement technology for the Internet. The Internet adopted a method of patchwork approach to cope with the needs of evolution and revolution of technology growth with acceptable cost and speed. The Internet is not designed for any specific application purposes; rather it is for generic and evolves purposes. The Future Network is expected to hosts much more than today's applications in an efficient manner, but researcher predicted rigidity as one of the failure factors for Current Internet (CI). In this paper the authors’ emphasis on the development of the improved Future Network using with broker's communication which works based on SOA while accounting and addressing the issues of CI failure factors.

[1]  Mark Handley,et al.  From protocol stack to protocol heap: role-based architecture , 2003, CCRV.

[2]  George N. Rouskas,et al.  The SILO Architecture for Services Integration, controL, and Optimization for the Future Internet , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[3]  David D. Clark,et al.  The design philosophy of the DARPA internet protocols , 1988, SIGCOMM '88.

[4]  Bogdan M. Wilamowski,et al.  The Transmission Control Protocol , 2005, The Industrial Information Technology Handbook.

[5]  Larry L. Peterson,et al.  A dynamic network architecture , 1992, TOCS.

[6]  Raj Jain,et al.  Architectures for the future networks and the next generation Internet: A survey , 2011, Comput. Commun..

[7]  D. Saunders.  The brave new world , 1999 .

[8]  Guy Leduc,et al.  Basic Abstractions for an Autonomic Network Architecture , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks.

[9]  S. M. Bellovin,et al.  Security problems in the TCP/IP protocol suite , 1989, CCRV.

[10]  Jerome H. Saltzer,et al.  End-to-end arguments in system design , 1984, TOCS.

[11]  Vern Paxson,et al.  Computing TCP's Retransmission Timer , 2000, RFC.

[12]  Bernd Reuther,et al.  A Model for Service-Oriented Communication Systems , 2006, 32nd EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (EUROMICRO'06).

[14]  Zabih Ghassemlooy,et al.  A MIMO-ANN system for increasing data rates in organic visible light communications systems , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[15]  Tim Moors.  A critical review of "End-to-end arguments in system design" , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Proceedings. ICC 2002 (Cat. No.02CH37333).

[16]  Van Jacobson,et al.  BufferBloat: What’s Wrong with the Internet? , 2011, ACM Queue.

[17]  Paolo Traverso,et al.  Service-Oriented Computing: State of the Art and Research Challenges , 2007, Computer.

[18]  Martina Zitterbart,et al.  Selecting Concurrent Network Architectures at Runtime , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[19]  Randy Bush,et al.  Some Internet Architectural Guidelines and Philosophy , 2002, RFC.

[20]  Philippe Oechslin,et al.  On parallelizing and optimizing the implementation of communication protocols , 1996, TNET.

[21]  Bernd Reuther,et al.  Design and Implementation Issues of Flexible Network Architecture , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks.

[22]  David D. Clark,et al.  Tussle in cyberspace: defining tomorrow's Internet , 2002, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[23]  David D. Clark,et al.  Rethinking the design of the Internet , 2001, ACM Trans. Internet Techn..

[24]  J. Crowcroft,et al.  Is layering, harmful? (remote procedure call) , 1992, IEEE Network.

[25]  Dirk Trossen,et al.  Should specific values be embedded in the internet architecture? , 2010, ReARCH '10.