Support surface interface pressure, microenvironment, and the prevalence of pressure ulcers: an analysis of the literature.

External pressure is the most frequently considered stress factor in the formation of ulcers. A review and analysis of existing literature addressing the relationship between pressure ulcer prevalence and interface pressures at various anatomic sites was conducted. Results suggest a nearly non-existent or slightly negative correlation between interface pressure and ulcer prevalence in general and spinal cord injured populations, respectively. Despite limitations of the analysis methods used, the observed lack of a direct relationship confirms the results of other studies and suggests that ulcer formation also may involve factors secondary to pressure and mechanical factors (eg, temperature, moisture, duration of the applied load, atrophy, and posture). Based on currently available information, clinicians should include these considerations when selecting a support surface. Studies directly relating primary stress factors and tissue viability with prevalence and incidence of pressure ulcers are needed to better understand the benefits of pressure-relieving support surfaces and to improve the effectiveness of prevention and treatment.

[1]  Steven I. Reger,et al.  Biomechanics of Tissue Distortion and Stiffness by Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1990 .

[2]  L. Russell,et al.  Overview of research to investigate pressure-relieving surfaces. , 2001, British journal of nursing.

[3]  V Allen,et al.  Repeatability of subject/bed interface pressure measurements. , 1993, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[4]  Keith J. Leland,et al.  Temperature-modulated pressure ulcers: a porcine model. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  P. Goodwin,et al.  Skin pressure measurements on various mattress surfaces in cancer patients. , 1983, American journal of physical medicine.

[6]  R Jay Pressure and shear: their effects on support surface choice. , 1995, Ostomy/wound management.

[7]  E Trefler,et al.  The relationship between pressure ulcer incidence and buttock-seat cushion interface pressure in at-risk elderly wheelchair users. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  S M REICHEL,et al.  Shearing force as a factor in decubitus ulcers in paraplegics. , 1958, Journal of the American Medical Association.

[9]  김명욱 Pathophysiology , 1990, Definitions.

[10]  Vistnes Lm,et al.  Flotation mattresses for preventing and treating tissue breakdown. , 1975, Geriatrics.

[11]  Koji Kito,et al.  Pressure ulcers in America: prevalence, incidence, and implications for the future. An executive summary of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel monograph. , 2001, Advances in skin & wound care.

[12]  R. Allman,et al.  Pressure ulcers among the elderly. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  V Allen,et al.  MEASUREMENTS OF INTERFACE PRESSURE BETWEEN BODY SITES AND THE SURFACES OF FOUR SPECIALISED AIR MATTRESSES , 1994, The British journal of clinical practice.

[14]  C. Lyder Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management , 2002, Annual Review of Nursing Research.

[15]  S. Carr,et al.  A clinical evaluation of the air-fluidised bed in a general plastic surgery unit. , 1981, British journal of plastic surgery.

[16]  C. F. Langworthy,et al.  BODY TEMPERATURE. , 1904, Science.

[17]  Hospitalizations Related to Pressure Sores, 2003 , 2006 .

[18]  L. Bennett,et al.  Shear vs pressure as causative factors in skin blood flow occlusion. , 1979, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  L. Parish,et al.  The Decubitus Ulcer in Clinical Practice , 1997, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[20]  C Hershler,et al.  Pressure ulcer prophylaxis in elderly patients using polyurethane foam or Jay wheelchair cushions. , 1994, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[21]  S. Cronin,et al.  Comparison of the effectiveness of two pressure-relieving surfaces: low-air-loss versus static fluid. , 2000, Ostomy/Wound Management.

[22]  B. Kuhn,et al.  Balancing the pressure ulcer cost and quality equation. , 1992, Nursing economic$.

[23]  R. Castellino,et al.  A Quantitative Analysis of Pressure and Shear in the Effectiveness of Support Surfaces , 1998, Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.

[24]  S. Wilking,et al.  Pressure ulcers. , 1998, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[25]  E. Landis,et al.  Micro-injection studies of capillary blood pressure in human skin , 1930 .

[26]  B. Klitzman,et al.  Multimodality Evaluation of Pressure Relief Surfaces , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[27]  I. El-Toraei,et al.  The management of pressure sores. , 1977, The Journal of dermatologic surgery and oncology.

[28]  M. Mcsweeney,et al.  Pressure‐reduction products: Making appropriate choices , 1993, Journal of ET nursing : official publication, International Association for Enterostomal Therapy.

[29]  M. Collier Pressure-reducing mattresses. , 1996, Journal of Wound Care.

[30]  V. Sahgal,et al.  Validation test for climate control on air-loss supports. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[31]  Susan L Garber,et al.  Pressure ulcers in veterans with spinal cord injury: a retrospective study. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[32]  C A Bar,et al.  Evaluation of cushions using dynamic pressure measurement , 1991, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[33]  R. Briones,et al.  National Prevalence and Incidence Study: 6‐Year Sequential Acute Care Data , 2004, Advances in skin & wound care.