The knowledge used in vision and where it comes from.

Knowledge is often thought to be something brought from outside to act upon the visual messages received from the eye in a 'top-down' fashion, but this is a misleadingly narrow view. First, the visual system is a multilevel heterarchy with connections acting in all directions so it has no 'top'; and second, knowledge is provided through innately determined structure and by analysis of the redundancy in sensory messages themselves, as well as from outside. This paper gives evidence about mechanisms analysing sensory redundancy in biological vision. Automatic gain controls for luminance and contrast depend upon feedback from the input, and there are strong indications that the autocorrelation function, and other associations between input variables, affect the contrast sensitivity function and our subjective experience of the world. The associative structure of sensory message can provide much knowledge about the world we live in, and neural mechanisms that discount established associative structure in the input messages by recoding them can improve survival by making new structure more easily detectable. These mechanisms may be responsible for illusions, such as those produced by a concave face-mask, that are classically attributed to top-down influences.

[1]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Generative models for discovering sparse distributed representations. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[2]  R. Gregory,et al.  Knowledge in perception and illusion. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[3]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Contrast gain control in the cat's visual system. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  C. McCollough Color Adaptation of Edge-Detectors in the Human Visual System , 1965, Science.

[5]  H B Barlow,et al.  PATTERN RECOGNITION AND THE RESPONSES OF SENSORY NEURONS * , 1969, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[6]  M. Carandini,et al.  A tonic hyperpolarization underlying contrast adaptation in cat visual cortex. , 1997, Science.

[7]  J. A. Anderson,et al.  Representing geometrical knowledge. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[8]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Amplitude spectra of natural images , 1992 .

[9]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  H. Barlow,et al.  Change of organization in the receptive fields of the cat's retina during dark adaptation , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  M. A. Bouman,et al.  Spatial Modulation Transfer in the Human Eye , 1967 .

[12]  H. Barlow Vision: A theory about the functional role and synaptic mechanism of visual after-effects , 1991 .

[13]  F. Attneave Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.

[14]  L. P. O'Keefe,et al.  Adaptation to contingencies in macaque primary visual cortex. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[15]  A. Lanitis,et al.  Model-based interpretation of complex and variable images. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[16]  D. Mackay The Epistemological Problem for Automata , 1956 .

[17]  S Edelman,et al.  A model of visual recognition and categorization. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[18]  A Pentland Content-based indexing of images and video. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[19]  D Kersten,et al.  Perceptual categories for spatial layout. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[20]  Michael Satosi Watanabe,et al.  Information-Theoretical Aspects of Inductive and Deductive Inference , 1960, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[21]  R. Gregory The intelligent eye , 1970 .

[22]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Bayesian analysis of identification performance in monkey visual cortex: Nonlinear mechanisms and stimulus certainty , 1995, Vision Research.

[23]  A F Bobick,et al.  Movement, activity and action: the role of knowledge in the perception of motion. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[24]  J. Movshon,et al.  Visual neural development. , 1981, Annual review of psychology.

[25]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Adaptation of retinal processing to image contrast and spatial scale , 1997, Nature.