Assessment of Surrogate Safety Benefits of an Adaptive Traffic Control System

When Adaptive Traffic Control Systems are evaluated their safety benefits are rarely investigated. This ‘lack of interest’ in safety performance may be attributed to two major factors: (1) field assessments of safety improvements are impractical (i.e. time consuming and costly), and (2) methods for obtaining safety metrics from microscopic simulation models are uncommon. While collecting and analyzing field safety metrics (e.g. crash rates) remains operationally and analytically challenging, new tools are becoming available to provide surrogate safety measures based on microscopic simulation program outputs. The framework of this study uses a microsimulation model connected to Sydney Coordinated Adaptive Traffic System (SCATS) to generate vehicular trajectories which are fed into a Surrogate Safety Assessment Model. Realworld data from two Utah state routes are collected to reflect crashes before and after the adaptive system was deployed in 2006. The crash data are analyzed and compared to relevant surrogate safety measures to detect potential correlations between the two data sets. Results show that SCATS generates fewer rear-end and total conflicts than traditional traffic control while traditional control generates fewer crossing and lane-changing conflicts. Field crashes have increased in the last few years likely as a consequence of more numerous road construction activities. Correlation indicators between field crashes and simulated conflicts are not very strong but follow trends reported by other studies.

[1]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  SURROGATE MEASURES OF SAFETY , 2009 .

[2]  Marc Green,et al.  "How Long Does It Take to Stop?" Methodological Analysis of Driver Perception-Brake Times , 2000 .

[3]  P L Zador,et al.  Influence of the time duration of yellow traffic signals on driver response , 1980 .

[4]  Aleksandar Stevanovic,et al.  Adaptive Traffic Control Systems: Domestic and Foreign State of Practice , 2010 .

[5]  Peter T. Martin,et al.  Comparison of Before–After versus Off–On Adaptive Traffic Control Evaluations , 2009 .

[6]  Lester A Hoel,et al.  A SIMULATION-BASED APPROACH TO EVALUATE SAFETY IMPACTS OF INCREASED TRAFFIC SIGNAL DENSITY , 2002 .

[7]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Surrogate Safety Assessment Model and Validation: Final Report , 2008 .

[8]  Iisakki Kosonen,et al.  THE POTENTIAL OF MICROSCOPIC SIMULATION IN TRAFFIC SAFETY AND CONFLICT STUDIES , 2001 .

[9]  A J Bastable.  The economic and social impact of dynamic signal coordination in Sydney , 1980 .

[10]  Young-Jun Kweon,et al.  Development of crash prediction models using real time safety surrogate measures , 2008 .

[11]  David A Noyce,et al.  EVALUATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL DISPLAYS FOR PROTECTED/PERMISSIVE LEFT-TURN CONTROL , 2005 .

[12]  Gareth Millar,et al.  Microsimulation Evaluation of Benefits of SCATS-Coordinated Traffic Control Signals , 2006 .

[13]  Peter T. Martin,et al.  Comparative Evaluation of Adaptive Traffic Control System Assessments Through Field and Microsimulation , 2010, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[14]  G. Klunder,et al.  Development of a micro-simulation model to predict road traffic safety on intersections with surrogate safety measures , 2006 .

[15]  Judson S Matthias,et al.  EVALUATION OF DRIVER BEHAVIOR AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS (DISCUSSION) , 1983 .

[16]  Zvonko Kavran,et al.  Adaptive Traffic Control as Function of Safety , 2005 .

[17]  P R Lowrie,et al.  The Sydney coordinated adaptive traffic system - principles, methodology, algorithms , 1982 .

[18]  K Zimmerman,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF GUIDELINES FOR IDENTIFYING AND TREATING LOCATIONS WITH A RED-LIGHT-RUNNING PROBLEM , 2004 .

[19]  André-Gilles Dumont,et al.  Indicator for microsimulation-based safety evaluation , 2003 .

[20]  James A Bonneson,et al.  In-Service Evaluation of a Detection-Control System for High-Speed Signalized Intersections , 2005 .

[21]  Douglas Gettman,et al.  Balancing Safety and Capacity in an Adaptive Signal Control System—Phase 1 , 2010 .

[22]  Larry Head,et al.  Surrogate Safety Measures from Traffic Simulation Models , 2003 .

[23]  V. Sisiopiku,et al.  Relationship Between Volume-to-Capacity Ratios and Accident Rates , 1997 .

[24]  Nagui M. Rouphail,et al.  CONFLICT SIMULATION IN INTRAS: APPLICATION TO WEAVING AREA CAPACITY ANALYSIS , 1990 .

[25]  S. Emerson,et al.  AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). 2001. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Fourth Edition. Washington, D.C. , 2007 .

[26]  Nicolas Saunier,et al.  Exposure to lateral collision in signalized intersections with protected left turn under different traffic control strategies. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  R S Jenkins.  A STUDY OF SELECTION OF YELLOW CLEARANCE INTERVALS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS , 1969 .

[28]  Josep Perarnau,et al.  A SIMULATION STUDY TO EVALUATE THE PERFORMANCE OF ADAPTIVE CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR TRAFFIC SAFETY CONDITIONS IN THE VIELHA TUNNEL , 2003 .

[29]  A G Sims,et al.  Scats - application and field comparison with a transyt optimised fixed time system , 1982 .

[30]  P R Lowrie,et al.  FURTHER ON THE EFFECTS OF CO-ORDINATED TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEMS ON TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS , 1976 .

[31]  Robert C. Deen,et al.  TRAFFIC CONFLICTS AS A DIAGNOSTIC TOOL IN HIGHWAY SAFETY , 1977 .

[32]  H S Stein,et al.  TRAFFIC SIGNAL CHANGE INTERVALS: POLICIES, PRACTICES, AND SAFETY , 1986 .

[33]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  ROAD SAFETY PERFORMANCE ASSOCIATED WITH IMPROVED TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN AND INCREASED SIGNAL CONSPICUITY , 2002 .

[34]  W D Glauz,et al.  Relationships between traffic conflicts and accidents, volume 1: executive summary , 1985 .

[35]  Maurice Masliah,et al.  Desktop Reference for Crash Reduction Factors , 2007 .

[36]  Kaan Ozbay,et al.  Derivation and Validation of New Simulation-Based Surrogate Safety Measure , 2008 .