The Digital Health Divide

Objective. Innovations in health information technology (HIT) provide opportunities to reduce health care spending, improve quality of care, and improve health outcomes for older adults. However, concerns relating to older adults’ limited access and use of HIT, including use of the Internet for health information, fuel the digital health divide debate. This study evaluated the potential digital health divide in relation to characteristic and belief differences between older adult users and nonusers of online health information sources. Methods. A cross-sectional survey design was conducted using a random sample of older adults. A total of 225 older adults (age range = 50-92 years, M = 68.9 years, SD = 10.4) participated in the study. Results. Seventy-six percent of all respondents had Internet access. Users and nonusers of online health information differed significantly on age (M = 66.29 vs. M = 71.13), education, and previous experience with the health care system. Users and nonusers of online health information also differed significantly on Internet and technology access, however, a large percentage of nonusers had Internet access (56.3%), desktop computers (55.9%), and laptop computers or netbooks (43.2%). Users of online health information had higher mean scores on the Computer Self-Efficacy Measure than nonusers, t(159) = −7.29, p < .0001. Conclusion. This study found significant differences between older adult users and nonusers of online health information. Findings suggest strategies for reducing this divide and implications for health education programs to promote HIT use among older adults.

[1]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[2]  Ben-Tzion Karsh,et al.  Review Paper: A Systematic Review of Patient Acceptance of Consumer Health Information Technology , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[3]  J. Bernhardt,et al.  Health education and the digital divide: building bridges and filling chasms. , 2000, Health education research.

[4]  K. Schwartz,et al.  Family medicine patients' use of the Internet for health information: a MetroNet study. , 2006, Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM.

[5]  Bonnie J Wakefield,et al.  Internet use by primary care patients: where is the digital divide? , 2012, Family medicine.

[6]  Charles C. Hinnant,et al.  Exploring digital divides: An examination of eHealth technology use in health information seeking, communication and personal health information management in the USA , 2011, Health Informatics J..

[7]  Michele L. Ybarra,et al.  Help seeking behavior and the Internet: A national survey , 2006, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[8]  D. Bates,et al.  The future of health information technology in the patient-centered medical home. , 2010, Health affairs.

[9]  Karen A Monsen,et al.  Developing a personal health record for community-dwelling older adults and clinicians: technology and content. , 2012, Journal of gerontological nursing.

[10]  S. Cotten,et al.  Characteristics of online and offline health information seekers and factors that discriminate between them. , 2004, Social science & medicine.

[11]  Carolyn M. Shrewsbury Information Technology Issues in an Era of Greater State Responsibilities , 2002, Journal of aging & social policy.

[12]  Angela Fagerlin,et al.  Use of the Internet and Ratings of Information Sources for Medical Decisions: Results from the DECISIONS Survey , 2010, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[13]  Marita A. O'Brien,et al.  Diffusion of Technology: Frequency of use for Younger and Older Adults , 2011, Ageing international.

[14]  Amanda K. Hall,et al.  Healthy Aging 2.0: The Potential of New Media and Technology , 2012, Preventing chronic disease.

[15]  L. Balluz,et al.  The Impact of a Mixed-mode Data Collection Design on Response and Non-response Bias on a RDD Landline Telephone Survey , 2011 .

[16]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy. I: V. S. Ramachandran (red.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (vol. s. ). New York: Academic Press. , 1994 .

[17]  William R. Hersh,et al.  BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making , 2009 .

[18]  R. Campbell,et al.  Older Women and the Internet , 2004, Journal of women & aging.

[19]  Terri Gullickson,et al.  Encyclopedia of human behavior , 1995 .

[20]  A. Chu,et al.  "Partnering with Seniors for Better Health": computer use and Internet health information retrieval among older adults in a low socioeconomic community. , 2009, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[21]  Linda Little,et al.  E-health , 2008, BCS HCI.

[22]  Joseph Sharit,et al.  Factors influencing use of an e-health website in a community sample of older adults , 2013, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[23]  Kate Lorig,et al.  Patient Education: A Practical Approach , 1992 .

[24]  D. Blumenthal,et al.  Health information technology: laying the infrastructure for national health reform. , 2010, Health affairs.

[25]  Joseph Sharit,et al.  Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[26]  D. Schunk,et al.  Self-Efficacy and Academic Motivation , 2002 .

[27]  Susan L. Gatto,et al.  Computer, Internet, and E-mail Use Among Older Adults: Benefits and Barriers , 2008 .

[28]  Susan S. Woods,et al.  Barriers and drivers of health information technology use for the elderly, chronically ill, and underserved. , 2008, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[29]  Joel Carter,et al.  Meaningful Use. , 2016, Journal of palliative medicine.

[30]  Thomas Martin,et al.  Assessing mHealth: Opportunities and Barriers to Patient Engagement , 2012, Journal of health care for the poor and underserved.

[31]  Peter Tugwell,et al.  Development and pilot testing of a decision aid for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. , 2002, Patient education and counseling.