Classifying real and imaginary finger press tasks on a P300-based brain-computer interface

Brain computer interfaces based on P300 and sensory-motor rhythms are widely studied and recent advances show some interest in the combination of the two. In this paper, typical P300 paradigm is modified by adding animation guide of the finger press as a stimulus and by using different response strategies (silent counting and actual/imaginary left or right index finger press following the animation). Both P300 potentials and sensory-motor rhythms are directly exploited and discussed. Classification results showed that even under very demanding conditions, which was, 200ms inter-stimulus interval of the P300 stimuli and actual/imaginary finger press once per 1.6s, the paradigm can evoke both P300 potentials and sensory-motor rhythms simultaneously. Actual finger press increased single trial P300 selection accuracy of different subjects by 5–29.5% compared with silent counting; imaginary finger press did not increase the P300 selection accuracy apparently for most subjects except the two who were very poor at counting task. This showed by using different interface design and adopting certain mental response strategies, the ‘BCI illiteracy’ may be cured. Also imaginary task had good performance of left versus right classification (with the best subject reached 81.1% of accuracy), which is an additional information that can be used to improve system performance.

[1]  Yi Li,et al.  A P300 based online brain-computer interface system for virtual hand control , 2010, Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE C.

[2]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Imagery of motor actions: differential effects of kinesthetic and visual-motor mode of imagery in single-trial EEG. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[3]  E Donchin,et al.  The mental prosthesis: assessing the speed of a P300-based brain-computer interface. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  Francisco Sepulveda,et al.  Classification effects of real and imaginary movement selective attention tasks on a P300-based brain–computer interface , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[5]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Classifying Single Trial EEG: Towards Brain Computer Interfacing , 2001, NIPS.

[6]  Yuanqing Li,et al.  An EEG-Based BCI System for 2-D Cursor Control by Combining Mu/Beta Rhythm and P300 Potential , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Mu and Beta Rhythm Topographies During Motor Imagery and Actual Movements , 2004, Brain Topography.

[8]  Dean J Krusienski,et al.  A comparison of classification techniques for the P300 Speller , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.

[9]  H. Flor,et al.  A spelling device for the paralysed , 1999, Nature.

[10]  E. Donchin,et al.  Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  EEG-based discrimination between imagination of right and left hand movement. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  E. Donchin,et al.  P300 and tracking difficulty: evidence for multiple resources in dual-task performance. , 1980, Psychophysiology.

[13]  Weidong Chen,et al.  Time-frequency optimized spatial patterns for movement-related EEG decoding , 2011, 2011 5th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering.

[14]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[15]  R. McCarley,et al.  Button-pressing affects P300 amplitude and scalp topography , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.