An ultrafast insulin formulation enabled by high-throughput screening of engineered polymeric excipients

Monomeric insulin stabilized with polymeric excipient exhibits increased stability and faster pharmacokinetics than current rapid-acting insulins. Faster formulations People with type 1 diabetes require exogenous insulin to regulate blood glucose, but controlling glycemic excursions at mealtimes is difficult using current insulin formulations. Mann et al. developed polymeric excipients to reduce insulin aggregation and improve pharmacokinetics. When formulated with insulin lispro, the top-performing acrylamide carrier/dopant copolymer excipient enabled fast insulin absorption upon subcutaneous delivery in diabetic pigs and improved stability in response to stressed aging conditions as compared to commercial fast-acting insulin lispro. This rapidly absorbed insulin formulation could improve glucose control for diabetes. Insulin has been used to treat diabetes for almost 100 years; yet, current rapid-acting insulin formulations do not have sufficiently fast pharmacokinetics to maintain tight glycemic control at mealtimes. Dissociation of the insulin hexamer, the primary association state of insulin in rapid-acting formulations, is the rate-limiting step that leads to delayed onset and extended duration of action. A formulation of insulin monomers would more closely mimic endogenous postprandial insulin secretion, but monomeric insulin is unstable in solution using present formulation strategies and rapidly aggregates into amyloid fibrils. Here, we implement high-throughput–controlled radical polymerization techniques to generate a large library of acrylamide carrier/dopant copolymer (AC/DC) excipients designed to reduce insulin aggregation. Our top-performing AC/DC excipient candidate enabled the development of an ultrafast-absorbing insulin lispro (UFAL) formulation, which remains stable under stressed aging conditions for 25 ± 1 hours compared to 5 ± 2 hours for commercial fast-acting insulin lispro formulations (Humalog). In a porcine model of insulin-deficient diabetes, UFAL exhibited peak action at 9 ± 4 min, whereas commercial Humalog exhibited peak action at 25 ± 10 min. These ultrafast kinetics make UFAL a promising candidate for improving glucose control and reducing burden for patients with diabetes.

[1]  M. Webber,et al.  Stable Monomeric Insulin Formulations Enabled by Supramolecular PEGylation of Insulin Analogues , 2020, Advanced therapeutics.

[2]  I. Hramiak,et al.  Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart and the Need for New Mealtime Insulin Analogues in Adults With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: A Canadian Perspective. , 2019, Canadian journal of diabetes.

[3]  J. Sturis,et al.  Elucidating the Mechanism of Absorption of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart: The Role of Niacinamide , 2019, Pharmaceutical Research.

[4]  G. Meiffren,et al.  BioChaperone Lispro versus faster aspart and insulin aspart in patients with type 1 diabetes using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: A randomized euglycemic clamp study , 2019, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[5]  T. Pieber,et al.  Clinical Pharmacology of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart Versus Insulin Aspart Measured as Free or Total Insulin Aspart and the Relation to Anti-Insulin Aspart Antibody Levels in Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus , 2018, Clinical Pharmacokinetics.

[6]  G. Meiffren,et al.  Ultra‐rapid BioChaperone Lispro improves postprandial blood glucose excursions vs insulin lispro in a 14‐day crossover treatment study in people with type 1 diabetes , 2018, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[7]  C. Fidler,et al.  The value of fast-acting insulin aspart compared with insulin aspart for patients with diabetes mellitus treated with bolus insulin from a UK health care system perspective , 2018, Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism.

[8]  R. Rabasa-Lhoret,et al.  The challenges of achieving postprandial glucose control using closed‐loop systems in patients with type 1 diabetes , 2018, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[9]  A. Kavitha,et al.  Polyacrylamide and related polymers , 2018 .

[10]  A. Matsuda Insulin lispro , 2018, Reactions Weekly.

[11]  O. Kordonouri,et al.  Faster‐acting insulin aspart provides faster onset and greater early exposure vs insulin aspart in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus , 2017, Pediatric diabetes.

[12]  Kang Chen,et al.  Comparison of NMR and Dynamic Light Scattering for Measuring Diffusion Coefficients of Formulated Insulin: Implications for Particle Size Distribution Measurements in Drug Products , 2017, The AAPS Journal.

[13]  R. Seckler,et al.  Rapid-Acting and Human Insulins: Hexamer Dissociation Kinetics upon Dilution of the Pharmaceutical Formulation , 2017, Pharmaceutical Research.

[14]  Pieter Gillard,et al.  Insulin analogues in type 1 diabetes mellitus: getting better all the time , 2017, Nature Reviews Endocrinology.

[15]  S. Heller,et al.  Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart Improves Glycemic Control in Basal-Bolus Treatment for Type 1 Diabetes: Results of a 26-Week Multicenter, Active-Controlled, Treat-to-Target, Randomized, Parallel-Group Trial (onset 1) , 2017, Diabetes Care.

[16]  H. Maynard,et al.  Trehalose Glycopolymer Enhances Both Solution Stability and Pharmacokinetics of a Therapeutic Protein. , 2017, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[17]  L. Heinemann,et al.  Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties of a Novel Inhaled Insulin , 2017, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[18]  S. Armes,et al.  H2O2 Enables Convenient Removal of RAFT End-Groups from Block Copolymer Nano-Objects Prepared via Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly in Water , 2016, Macromolecules.

[19]  T. Heise,et al.  Pharmacological properties of faster‐acting insulin aspart vs insulin aspart in patients with type 1 diabetes receiving continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: A randomized, double‐blind, crossover trial , 2016, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[20]  Daniel G. Anderson,et al.  Supramolecular PEGylation of biopharmaceuticals , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Seamus D. Jones,et al.  High-Throughput Excipient Discovery Enables Oral Delivery of Poorly Soluble Pharmaceuticals , 2016, ACS central science.

[22]  T. Heise,et al.  Faster‐acting insulin aspart: earlier onset of appearance and greater early pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects than insulin aspart , 2015, Diabetes, obesity & metabolism.

[23]  M. Riehle,et al.  Poly(N-acryloylmorpholine): a simple hydrogel system for temporal and spatial control over cell adhesion. , 2014, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[24]  Y. Bréchet,et al.  Human insulin adsorption kinetics, conformational changes and amyloidal aggregate formation on hydrophobic surfaces. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[25]  C. Cobelli,et al.  Diurnal Pattern to Insulin Secretion and Insulin Action in Healthy Individuals , 2012, Diabetes.

[26]  Nicolas Bertrand,et al.  The journey of a drug-carrier in the body: an anatomo-physiological perspective. , 2012, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[27]  E. Cengiz Undeniable Need for Ultrafast-Acting Insulin: The Pediatric Perspective , 2012, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[28]  R. Pettis,et al.  Intrinsic Fibrillation of Fast-Acting Insulin Analogs , 2012, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[29]  Lianhong Sun,et al.  Multimerization and aggregation of native-state insulin: effect of zinc. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[30]  R.E. Lee Handbook of Metal-ligand Interactions in Biological fluids , 2012 .

[31]  Atta Ahmad,et al.  The Mechanism of Enhanced Insulin Amyloid Fibril Formation by NaCl Is Better Explained by a Conformational Change Model , 2011, PloS one.

[32]  Lutz Heinemann,et al.  Microneedle-based intradermal versus subcutaneous administration of regular human insulin or insulin lispro: pharmacokinetics and postprandial glycemic excursions in patients with type 1 diabetes. , 2011, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[33]  Diannan Lu,et al.  How PEGylation enhances the stability and potency of insulin: a molecular dynamics simulation. , 2011, Biochemistry.

[34]  G. Moad,et al.  Thiocarbonylthio end group removal from RAFT‐synthesized polymers by a radical‐induced process , 2009 .

[35]  M. Weiss Chapter 2 The Structure and Function of Insulin , 2009 .

[36]  M. Weiss The structure and function of insulin: decoding the TR transition. , 2009, Vitamins and hormones.

[37]  Christopher E Hann,et al.  A Subcutaneous Insulin Pharmacokinetic Model for Computer Simulation in a Diabetes Decision Support Role: Model Structure and Parameter Identification , 2008, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[38]  Kenneth K. Wu,et al.  Streptozotocin‐Induced Diabetic Models in Mice and Rats , 2008, Current protocols in pharmacology.

[39]  R. Becker,et al.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Insulin Glulisine , 2008, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[40]  J. Reichrath,et al.  Vitamins as hormones. , 2007, Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme.

[41]  M. Haymond,et al.  The role of amylin and glucagon in the dampening of glycemic excursions in children with type 1 diabetes. , 2005, Diabetes.

[42]  F. A. Andersen Amended Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Polyacrylamide and Acrylamide Residues in Cosmetics1 , 2005, International journal of toxicology.

[43]  M. Weiss,et al.  Mechanism of Insulin Fibrillation , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[44]  M. Larsen,et al.  Use of the Göttingen minipig as a model of diabetes, with special focus on type 1 diabetes research. , 2004, ILAR journal.

[45]  Gernot Brunner,et al.  A direct comparison of insulin aspart and insulin lispro in patients with type 1 diabetes. , 2002, Diabetes care.

[46]  A. Lindholm,et al.  Improved postprandial glycemic control with insulin aspart. A randomized double-blind cross-over trial in type 1 diabetes. , 1999, Diabetes care.

[47]  R. DiMarchi,et al.  Bioavailability and Bioeffectiveness of Subcutaneous Human Insulin and Two of its Analogs—LysB28ProB29-Human Insulin and AspB10LysB28ProB29-Human Insulin—Assessed in a Conscious Pig Model , 1997, Diabetes.

[48]  A. Klibanov,et al.  Mechanism of insulin aggregation and stabilization in agitated aqueous solutions , 1992, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[49]  J. Tamada,et al.  Kinetics of insulin aggregation in aqueous solutions upon agitation in the presence of hydrophobic surfaces. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  E. Dodson,et al.  Phenol stabilizes more helix in a new symmetrical zinc insulin hexamer , 1989, Nature.

[51]  B H Frank,et al.  Dose-dependent effects of oral and intravenous glucose on insulin secretion and clearance in normal humans. , 1988, The American journal of physiology.

[52]  K. Polonsky,et al.  Twenty-four-hour profiles and pulsatile patterns of insulin secretion in normal and obese subjects. , 1988, The Journal of clinical investigation.