Problematising ‘Fused Principles’ in Discourses of Preventative Social Care: Interpreting the Implementation of National Social Services Legislation in Wales, UK

Prevention is a core principle in social care legislation across the UK. However, history shows great variability in how a preventative social care agenda is conceptualised and implemented. We report findings from an independent evaluation of the implementation of the ‘2014 Social Services and Well-being (Wales) Act’ incorporating a document analysis of reports and plans from Wales’ twenty-two local authorities (LAs) and eighty-eight qualitative interviews from social services strategic leaders and operational managers within four Welsh LAs. Analysis highlighted multiple interpretations of national policy, with notable overlapping agendas. In Gramscian terms, there is a constant process of negotiating prevention values and agendas, with consequences for whose interests are served. This was apparent through drives towards cost-saving, financial sustainability and reduced service demand operating alongside values-based principles rooted in well-being and mutualism. Following Kenny’s work in community development, we argue a ‘fusing’ of principles whilst espousing benefits for service users, potentially blurs the aims of the legislation, with implications for practice.

[1]  Emma Taylor-Collins,et al.  The local government response to austerity in a small devolved country: the case of Wales , 2021, Local Government Studies.

[2]  F. Verity,et al.  Towards a contemporary social care 'prevention narrative' of principled complexity: An integrative literature review. , 2021, Health & social care in the community.

[3]  G. Wistow,et al.  Evaluating Social Care Prevention in England: Challenges and Opportunities , 2019 .

[4]  Vaia Doudaki Analysing discourse , 2019, Discourses of Legitimation in the News.

[5]  Merlinda Weinberg,et al.  Practising Ethically in Unethical Times: Everyday Resistance in Social Work , 2019, Ethics and Social Welfare.

[6]  B. Williams Austerity Britain – A Brief History , 2019, Political Insight.

[7]  P. Garrett What are we talking about when we talk about ‘Neoliberalism’? , 2018, Social Work and Neoliberalism.

[8]  Valeria Guarneros-Meza,et al.  Local governance under austerity: hybrid organisations and hybrid officers , 2017, Policy & Politics.

[9]  I. Gough The Political Economy of Prevention , 2015 .

[10]  Betty J. Ruth,et al.  Shaping the future of prevention in social work: an analysis of the professional literature from 2000 through 2010. , 2015, Social work.

[11]  L. Engelbrecht,et al.  The implications of neoliberalism for social work: Reflections from a six-country international research collaboration , 2014 .

[12]  K. West,et al.  The grip of personalization in adult social care: Between managerial domination and fantasy , 2013 .

[13]  J. Forester On the theory and practice of critical pragmatism: Deliberative practice and creative negotiations , 2013 .

[14]  J. Newman,et al.  The alchemy of austerity , 2012 .

[15]  Carrie W. Rishel,et al.  Prevention as an Explicit Part of the Social Work Profession: A Systematic Investigation , 2010 .

[16]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[17]  Susan Kenny,et al.  Tensions and dilemmas in community development: new discourses, new Trojans? , 2002 .

[18]  F. Williams Good-enough Principles for Welfare , 1999, Journal of Social Policy.

[19]  L. Rapoport The Concept of Prevention in Social Work , 1961 .