Complexity Theory in the Study of Space and Place

Researchers across disciplines apply complexity theory to issues ranging from economic development to earthquake prediction. The breadth of applications speaks to the promise of complexity theory, but there remain a number of challenges to be met, particularly those related to its ontological and epistemological dimensions. We identify a number of key issues by asking three questions. Does complexity theory operate at too general a level to enhance understanding? What are the ontological and epistemological implications of complexity? What are the challenges in modeling complexity? In answering these questions, we argue that, although complexity offers much to the study of place and space, research in these areas has a number of strengths that enhance complexity research.

[1]  Tony Hoare,et al.  Contemporary fiddling in human geography while Rome burns: has quantitative analysis been largely abandoned - and should it be? , 2003 .

[2]  David J. Hayward,et al.  The Capitalist Space Economy: Geographical Analysis after Ricardo, Marx and Sraffa , 1996 .

[3]  Stephanie Forrest,et al.  Emergent computation: self-organizing, collective, and cooperative phenomena in natural and artificial computing networks , 1990 .

[4]  John H. Miller,et al.  Active Nonlinear Tests (Ants) of Complex Simulation Models , 1998 .

[5]  G. Cowan,et al.  Complexity Metaphors, Models, and Reality , 1994 .

[6]  Geraldine Pratt,et al.  Gender, Class, and Space , 1988 .

[7]  J. Pickles.  Tool or Science? GIS, Technoscience, and the Theoretical Turn , 1997 .

[8]  M. Roberts,et al.  The future of geography , 2006 .

[9]  F. Taylor.  Cybernetics (or control and communication in the animal and the machine). , 1949 .

[10]  Timothy Evans,et al.  A Review and Assessment of Land-Use Change Models Dynamics of Space, Time, and Human Choice , 2002 .

[11]  David M. Raup,et al.  How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality , 1997 .

[12]  Nigel Gilbert,et al.  Computer simulation for social theory , 1995 .

[13]  P. Sabatier.  Theories of the Policy Process , 1999 .

[14]  Andrew Sayer,et al.  Radical Political Economy: A Critique , 1996 .

[15]  P. Krugman.  Confronting the Mystery of Urban Hierarchy , 1996 .

[16]  Michael Batty,et al.  Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function , 1996 .

[17]  Alberto Lo Presti,et al.  Futures research and complexity , 1996 .

[18]  S. Manson.  Simplifying complexity: a review of complexity theory , 2001 .

[19]  Norbert Wiener,et al.  Cybernetics, or control and communication in the animal and the machine, 2nd ed. , 1961 .

[20]  Tim Appenzeller,et al.  Beyond Reductionism , 1999, Science.

[21]  P. Cilliers,et al.  Complexity and post-modernism: understanding complex systems , 1999 .

[22]  Peter M. Allen,et al.  Self-organization and dissipative structures : applications in the physical and social sciences , 1982 .

[23]  Trevor J. Barnes,et al.  Retheorizing Economic Geography: From the Quantitative Revolution to the “Cultural Turn” , 2001 .

[24]  James Gleick.  Chaos: Making a New Science , 1987 .

[25]  John H. Miller,et al.  Auctions with Artificial Adaptive Agents , 1995 .

[26]  Nigel Thrift,et al.  The Place of Complexity , 1999 .

[27]  Leigh Tesfatsion,et al.  Introduction to the CE Special Issue on Agent-Based Computational Economics , 2001 .

[28]  John Law,et al.  Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity , 1992 .

[29]  John B Rundle,et al.  Self-organized complexity in the physical, biological, and social sciences , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  I. Benenson.  MULTI-AGENT SIMULATIONS OF RESIDENTIAL DYNAMICS IN THE CITY , 1998 .

[31]  Nigel Gilbert,et al.  Emergence in social simulation , 1995 .

[32]  Christophe Le Page,et al.  Cormas: Common-Pool Resources and Multi-agent Systems , 1998, IEA/AIE.

[33]  C. West Churchman,et al.  Science and Decision Making , 1956, Philosophy of Science.

[34]  Carlos E. Puente.  Lessons From Complexity , 2001 .

[35]  J. Hudson.  A DIAMOND ANNIVERSARY , 1979 .

[36]  Steven E. Phelan,et al.  A Note on the Correspondence Between Complexity and Systems Theory , 1999 .

[37]  Søren Damkjær,et al.  Theory, culture and society , 2006 .

[38]  K. Clayton,et al.  Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers , 1959 .

[39]  A. Whitehead.  Science and the Modern World , 1926 .

[40]  Steven M. Manson,et al.  Epistemological possibilities and imperatives of complexity research: a reply to Reitsma , 2003 .

[41]  N Oreskes,et al.  Evaluation (not validation) of quantitative models. , 1998, Environmental health perspectives.

[42]  A Wilson,et al.  The Use of Analogies in Geography , 2010 .

[43]  J. Crutchfield.  Is anything ever new?: considering emergence , 1999 .

[44]  Chris Philo,et al.  Foucault's Geography , 1992 .

[45]  David O'Sullivan.  Complexity science and human geography , 2004 .

[46]  Michael Dear,et al.  Postmodernism and Planning , 1986 .

[47]  J. Ravetz,et al.  Complexity: Fad or future? , 1994 .

[48]  Helen Couclelis,et al.  The Notion of Prior Structure in Urban Modelling , 1984 .

[49]  D. Gregory,et al.  The Dictionary of Human Geography , 1983 .

[50]  David J. Rapport,et al.  Myths in the foundations of economics and ecology , 1991 .

[51]  R. Keith Sawyer,et al.  Nonreductive Individualism , 2002 .

[52]  S V Buldyrev,et al.  Self-organized complexity in economics and finance , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  Mike Mannion,et al.  Complex systems , 1997, Proceedings International Conference and Workshop on Engineering of Computer-Based Systems.

[54]  Femke Reitsma,et al.  A Response to Simplifying Complexity , 2003 .

[55]  Steve Bankes,et al.  Exploratory Modeling for Policy Analysis , 1993, Oper. Res..

[56]  E. Bonabeau.  How nature works: The science of self-organized criticality (copernicus) , 1997 .

[57]  M. Batty,et al.  Spatial Analysis: Modelling in a GIS Environment , 1998 .

[58]  Paul A. Longley,et al.  Geocomputation: a primer , 1998 .

[59]  R. Axtell.  Zipf Distribution of U.S. Firm Sizes , 2001, Science.

[60]  R. Sawyer,et al.  Emergence in Sociology: Contemporary Philosophy of Mind and Some Implications for Sociological Theory1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[61]  Witold Kwaśnicki.  Evolutionary Economics and Simulation , 1999 .

[62]  Roger White,et al.  Cellular Automata and Fractal Urban Form: A Cellular Modelling Approach to the Evolution of Urban Land-Use Patterns , 1993 .

[63]  Z. Vekerdy.  Spatial analysis: modelling in a GIS environment , 1998 .

[64]  Prostitution In Nevada,et al.  ANNALS of the Association of American Geographers , 1974 .

[65]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Demystifying the Persistent Ambiguity of GIS as ‘Tool’ versus ‘Science’ , 1997 .

[66]  O P Judson,et al.  The rise of the individual-based model in ecology. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[67]  Bill McKelvey,et al.  Foundations of “new” social science: Institutional legitimacy from philosophy, complexity science, postmodernism, and agent-based modeling , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[68]  Jonathan D. Phillips,et al.  Earth Surface Systems: Complexity, Order and Scale , 1999 .

[69]  Helen Couclelis,et al.  Cellular Worlds: A Framework for Modeling Micro—Macro Dynamics , 1985 .

[70]  George Kingsley Zipf,et al.  Human behavior and the principle of least effort , 1949 .

[71]  Chris Hamnett,et al.  Contemporary human geography: fiddling while Rome burns? , 2003 .

[72]  Armano Srbljinovic,et al.  An Agent-Based Model of Ethnic Mobilisation , 2003, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[73]  T. Schelling.  Micromotives and Macrobehavior , 1978 .

[74]  N Oreskes,et al.  Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences , 1994, Science.

[75]  F. H. Adler.  Cybernetics, or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. , 1949 .

[76]  W. Torbert,et al.  The Action Turn: toward a transformational social science , 2001 .

[77]  Per Bak,et al.  How Nature Works , 1996 .

[78]  Goldenfeld,et al.  Simple lessons from complexity , 1999, Science.

[79]  John Horgan,et al.  From Complexity to Perplexity , 1995 .

[80]  Robin Flowerdew,et al.  Reacting to Ground Truth , 1998 .

[81]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[82]  M. Janssen,et al.  Multi-Agent Systems for the Simulation of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: A Review , 2003 .

[83]  S. Kauffman.  At Home in the Universe: The Search for the Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity , 1995 .

[84]  David Harvey.  Explanation in Geography , 1969 .

[85]  J. Casti.  Would-Be Worlds: How Simulation Is Changing the Frontiers of Science , 1996 .

[86]  Gary P. Kofinas,et al.  Ten Heuristics for Interdisciplinary Modeling Projects , 2002, Ecosystems.

[87]  E. Ostrom.  Institutional Rational Choice , 2019, Theories of the Policy Process.

[88]  P. Stewart.  Complexity Theories, Social Theory, and the Question of Social Complexity , 2001 .

[89]  P. M. Shearer,et al.  Zipf Distribution of U . S . Firm Sizes , 2022 .

[90]  Gunther J. Eble,et al.  The evolution of complexity , 2001, Complex..

[91]  Alberto RibesAbstract,et al.  Multi agent systems , 2019, Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Active Media Technology, 2005. (AMT 2005)..

[92]  S. Schneider,et al.  Imaginable surprise in global change science , 1998 .

[93]  N. Gilbert,et al.  Artificial Societies: The Computer Simulation of Social Life , 1995 .

[94]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  The Nature of Markets in the World Wide Web , 1999 .

[95]  Donald C. Mikulecky,et al.  The Emergence of Complexity: Science Coming of Age Or Science Growing Old? , 2001, Comput. Chem..