Changing relationship: Who is the learner and who is the teacher in the online educational landscape?

This article focuses on the special role of students as discussion leaders and their engagement in the facilitation of online discussion in relation to the teacher's role. The methodology combined quantitative data of students' frequency behaviour with qualitative analysis of students' individual online contributions. Each contribution was analysed in relation to one of the six facilitation roles plus the direct instruction category. In the seven that were used to compare the discussion leader's role with the teacher's role, the discussion leaders performed higher than the teacher in the following: summing up and confirming, moving the discussion forward, focusing the discussion and debriefing. The teacher demonstrated more frequent behaviours in the following: direct instruction and encouraging and giving feedback. Scaffolding had a similar frequency for the discussion leader and the teacher with a slightly higher rate. The task given to each member to be a discussion leader enabled new relationships between the teacher and the learners and new relationships among the learners, with everyone being empowered, changing their learning experiences and promoting the learning of others in the community.

[1]  Dorit Maor,et al.  Quality of Students’ Communicative Strategies Delivered Through Computer-Mediated Communications , 2004 .

[2]  Nathan Bond,et al.  Collaborative Reflection and Professional Community Building: An Analysis of Preservice Teachers’ Use of an Electronic Discussion Board , 2003 .

[3]  Christine B. Johnson,et al.  Supporting distributed communities of practice with interactive television , 2000 .

[4]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Role Adjustment for Learners in an Online Community of Inquiry: Identifying the Challenges of Incoming Online Learners , 2007, Int. J. Web Based Learn. Teach. Technol..

[5]  K. Lai,et al.  Synchronous Communication and Higher-Order Thinking in a Tertiary Course in Occupational Therapy , 2003 .

[6]  Ann Peterson Bishop,et al.  Reflections in Cyberspace: Web Conferencing for Language Teacher Education. , 2001 .

[7]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Design research: A socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education , 2005, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[8]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition , 2003 .

[9]  Dianne Conrad,et al.  Building and Maintaining Community in Cohort-Based Online Learning , 2005 .

[10]  Alfred P. Rovai,et al.  On-Line Course Effectiveness: An Analysis of Student Interactions and Perceptions of Learning , 2007 .

[11]  Karen Ivers,et al.  Facilitating the Development of a Learning Community in an Online Graduate Program. , 2006 .

[12]  Clare D. Klunk.  Collaborating Online: Learning Together in Community , 2005 .

[13]  Robert Heckman,et al.  A Content Analytic Comparison of Learning Processes in Online and Face-to-Face Case Study Discussions , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[14]  Raven Wallace,et al.  Online Learning in Higher Education: a review of research on interactions among teachers and students , 2003 .

[15]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[16]  Reem Al-Mahmood,et al.  Relearning through e-learning :changing conceptions of teaching through online experience , 2004 .

[17]  Robert Heckman,et al.  How the Teacher's Role Changes in On-line Case Study Discussions , 2006, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[18]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  DOES SENSE OF COMMUNITY MATTER? an Examination of Participants' Perceptions of Building Learning Communities in Online Courses , 2007 .

[19]  A. P. Rovai.  Building Sense of Community at a Distance , 2002, Distances et médiations des savoirs.

[20]  C. A. Twigg,et al.  Innovations in online learning: Moving beyond no significant difference , 2001 .

[21]  Hien Nguyen,et al.  Get Your Degree from an Educational ATM: An Empirical Study in Online Education , 2007 .

[22]  Charlotte N. Gunawardena,et al.  Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing , 1997 .

[23]  Chinwe H. Ikpeze.  Small Group Collaboration in Peer-Led Electronic Discourse: An Analysis of Group Dynamics and Interactions Involving Preservice and Inservice Teachers , 2007 .

[24]  Rose M. Marra.  A Review of Research Methods for Assessing Content of Computer-Mediated Discussion Forums , 2006 .

[25]  Dorit Maor,et al.  Teacher's and students' perspectives on on-line learning in a social constructivist learning environment , 2003 .

[26]  Anthony Kaye,et al.  Collaborative Learning Through Computer Conferencing , 1992, NATO ASI Series.