Subsection-controlling strategy for improving sorption-enhanced reaction process

The subsection-controlling strategy was applied to the design of the adsorptive reactor to improve the sorption-enhanced steam–methane reforming (SMR), by using subsection-packing ratio of adsorbent and catalyst, and subsection-controlling wall temperature. In the case of the subsection-controlling wall temperature, there is a lower operating temperature zone at the outlet of the adsorptive reactor, where the remaining CO and CO2 concentrations in gas stream can be decreased further by the principle of temperature-induced equilibrium shift. The feasibility and effectiveness of the subsection-controlling strategy for improving the sorption-enhanced steam–methane reforming process is analysed by numerical simulation based on literature data. At low operating pressure, in the range 222–445.7 kPa, combined with subsection-controlling strategy [higher temperature, 450–490°C, for subsections I (inlet zone of the adsorptive reactor) and II (middle zone of the adsorptive reactor) and lower temperature, 400–450°C, for subsection III (outlet zone of the adsorptive reactor); lower packing ratio of adsorbent and catalyst for subsections I and III and higher ratio for subsection II] a product gas with hydrogen purity above 85% and traces of CO2 (less than 300 ppm) and CO (less than 30 ppm) can be continuously produced with higher hydrogen productivity by a four-step one-bed (a 6 m long adsorptive reactor) pressure swing sorption-enhanced steam–methane reforming cyclic process, and may be directly used in fuel cell applications.

[1]  Yulong Ding,et al.  Equilibria and kinetics of CO2 adsorption on hydrotalcite adsorbent , 2000 .

[2]  Shamsuzzaman Farooq,et al.  Study of a six-bed pressure swing adsorption process , 1997 .

[3]  J. Armor,et al.  Overcoming equilibrium limitations in chemical processes , 2001 .

[4]  Gilbert F. Froment,et al.  Heat transfer in packed beds , 1972 .

[5]  D. Kunii,et al.  Studies on effective thermal conductivities in packed beds , 1957 .

[6]  R. Reid,et al.  The Properties of Gases and Liquids , 1977 .

[7]  M. F. Edwards,et al.  Gas dispersion in packed beds , 1968 .

[8]  E. Alpay,et al.  Design of periodic adsorptive reactors for the optimal integration of reaction, separation and heat exchange , 1999 .

[9]  Bruce A. Finlayson,et al.  Heat transfer in packed beds—a reevaluation , 1977 .

[10]  D. Agar,et al.  Adsorptive reactors for enhancing equilibrium gas-phase reactions—two case studies , 2002 .

[11]  Rajamani Krishna,et al.  Reactive Separations: More Ways to Skin a Cat , 2001 .

[12]  A. Rodrigues,et al.  Pressure swing adsorption reactors: Simulation of three‐step one‐bed process , 1994 .

[13]  Jeffrey Raymond Hufton,et al.  Sorption‐enhanced reaction process for hydrogen production , 1999 .

[14]  Yulong Ding,et al.  Adsorption-enhanced steam–methane reforming , 2000 .

[15]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  Sorption-enhanced reaction process with reactive regeneration , 2002 .

[16]  David W. Agar Multifunctional reactors: Old preconceptions and new dimensions , 1999 .

[17]  Jeffrey Raymond Hufton,et al.  Production of hydrogen by cyclic sorption enhanced reaction process , 2001 .

[18]  Alírio E. Rodrigues,et al.  Simulation of five-step one-bed sorption-enhanced reaction process , 2002 .

[19]  S. Ergun Fluid flow through packed columns , 1952 .