A Comparative Analysis on the Protection of Property Rights and the Intellectual Property Rights: a Pak-Chinese Legal Perspective

Intellectual property rights (IPRs) always drive invention and creativeness. It also creates new employment and makes you more competitive. Intellectual property rights protect and benefit the work of writers, artists, designers, discoverers, and other IPR users while they are being used by others. Intellectual property rights (IPRs) help protect ideas and creative works developed by inventors, designers, developers, and writers. After all, protecting intellectual property is one of the major challenges for both developed and developing nations. There are numerous international laws that protect intellectual property. International law employs several guidelines and recommendations to confirm the protection of intellectual property. In addition, most countries have intellectual property laws. Maximum countries have their own legislative powers to protect their intellectual property rights. But if not done properly, all these international and domestic intellectual property laws will be valueless. The legal system that China and Pakistan follow to protect their intellectual property is very similar to the legal system of developed countries but also has some main variances. This research paper attempts to examine the assessment of IPR protection in China and Pakistan. This research paper also describes IPR protection procedures in China and Pakistan. In addition, this article initiates a comparison of international IPR indexes to demonstrate and describe the variances in IPR protection assessments. This article also lists and describes the various factors that influence the lack of proper protection of property and intellectual property rights in both countries.

[1]  M. Asif,et al.  Analyzing the Trademark Protection Index of China and Pakistan: A Comparative Study , 2022, International Journal of Law and Politics Studies.

[2]  M. Billah,et al.  An Analysis on the Protection of Property Rights and the Intellectual Property Rights: Comparison between Bangladesh and China , 2021 .

[3]  S. Reexamining Trademark Dilution , 2020 .

[4]  D. Bochańczyk-Kupka A Comparative Analysis of Intellectual Property Rights Protection in China and India in the XXI Century , 2016 .

[5]  William W. Fisher,et al.  Strategic Management of Intellectual Property: An Integrated Approach , 2013 .

[6]  C. Smee,et al.  United Kingdom , 2000, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Medicine.

[7]  Philipp G. Sandner,et al.  Trademarks and Venture Capital Valuation , 2012 .

[8]  Antony Taubman,et al.  A handbook on the WTO TRIPS agreement , 2012 .

[9]  Gordon C. K. Cheung Intellectual Property Rights in China: Politics of Piracy, Trade and Protection , 2011 .

[10]  Barton Beebe,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Multifactor Tests for Trademark Infringement , 2006 .

[11]  C. Farley Why We Are Confused About the Trademark Dilution Law , 2006 .

[12]  M. Olarreaga,et al.  Trademark Protection or Protectionism? , 2004 .

[13]  B. Jacobs Trademark Dilution on the Constitutional Edge , 2004 .

[14]  Debora Halbert,et al.  Intellectual Property in the Information Age: The Politics of Expanding Ownership Rights , 1999 .

[15]  Daniel J. Gervais,et al.  The TRIPS agreement: Drafting history and analysis , 1998 .

[16]  David A. Burge,et al.  Patent and trademark tactics and practice , 1980 .